PDA

View Full Version : What constitutes an anti-hero these days?


BitVyper
09-20-2006, 12:43 PM
I've been doing some reading on the subject lately, and it seems like the modern definition of "anti-hero" can be stretched to include anyone from Shinji Ikari to Superman. Of course, if the term can mean anything, it means nothing, so that doesn't work.

Most characters being written today have at least some human flaws, and tend to operate by their own moral compass. I actually had someone point out Son Goku as an anti-hero to me for this reason (to be fair, if one looks at his actions in a certain light, Goku can be taken as a very selfish individual).

Generally, it seems like the rebel-type characters are taken as anti-heroes today, but that takes away more traditional anti-heroes, like Shinji, Macbeth, and Hamlet. Besides that, those rebel characters are becoming so common that they're practically the norm, with Captain Americas and Supermen being less common. Should those characters with strong morals, great courage, and powerful conviction then be considered the anti-heroes? That doesn't really seem right either.

Anyway, my question is just this: What should constitute an anti-hero now? Is the term even useful anymore, now that we are exposed to a much greater variety of characters than when it was originally used? Am I just deconstructing language that doesn't need to be deconstructed?

Azisien
09-20-2006, 03:57 PM
These aren't terms I deal with so forgive me if I misunderstand the definition...

The anti-hero doesn't have the villain tag, otherwise they would be villains, right? But they seem to be popular because they're all badass and such, usually.

My favorite example of an anti-hero recently is Takeshi Kovacs in the Altered Carbon trilogy by Richard Morgan. Basically, he wasn't a complete sadist, and he did do heroic things ultimately for the greater good. But he was also selfish and often brutally immoral. It's what I consider an ideal anti-hero. They might mean well in some areas but their execution is often...not your iconic "hero."

I try to differentiate that from, say, an all out VILLAIN working on the side of the heroes due to circumstance.

Satan's Onion
09-20-2006, 07:31 PM
I've heard Commander Vimes (from Terry Pratchett's Discworld novels) referred to as an anti-hero; but I dunno. He's not exactly a rebel, 'cos he's in a position of authority; but he's not simply the right hand of traditional authority either, 'cos he does what he damn well sees fit, to anyone whom he thinks needs something done to them. At this point, Azisien's definition dounds pretty good to me.

Zalgon 26 McGee
09-20-2006, 08:15 PM
Commander Vimes delivers truth and justice with fist, club and, where necessary, stabbing implements.

Westerns (and, yes, historical tales from China and Japan) pretty much invented the anti-hero... the wandering bad-ass who improves the lives of some people around him usually as incidental to ending the lives of bad people around him. In this manner, even Jim Profit could be considered an anti-hero.

These days, it's usually someone who, for various reasons, performs actions and deeds that would be deemed heroic, but does it for unheroic, selfish, or entirely indifferent reasons. See: Riddick.

Also, a list! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_anti-heroes

Demetrius
09-20-2006, 11:36 PM
Hari Michaelson or Caine from Heroes Die, dunno if any of you NPFers are familiar with the book.

Aerozord
09-21-2006, 01:06 AM
to me anti-hero was more of an alternate type of protagonist.

A hero is a person who fights for justice and protects the innocent. Defeating the bad guy

anti-hero fights for reason X and doesn't really care about innocent as much as killing the bad guy.

You can also take it based on priority. Heros care more about protecting the good, while anti-heros care more about beating the bad guy

Mesden
09-21-2006, 01:10 AM
Wooo, fangirlism.

Take Scar from FMA. (Be prepared for biased results!) In the light of who he is, he's actively trying to attack the Protaganist for a larger cause. In reality he is really a vigilante, so to say, enacting what he thinks is right, something that generally conflicts with the main Protaganist's cause. He's a hero in his own right, but to the whole of the story he's a counter protaganist.

Counter Protaganist. I like that.

Edit: It applies to the manga too! So...I'm still on track >.>.

gurusloth
09-21-2006, 01:13 AM
Hari Michaelson or Caine from Heroes Die, dunno if any of you NPFers are familiar with the book.Yeah, I'd have to agree with that one. Great book, BTW. The sequel, Blade of Tyshalle, was good too.

Igbutton
09-25-2006, 06:10 AM
I agree with AeroZord, heroic deeds for selfish reasons make an anti-hero. I think Guts from Berserk is a good example.