View Full Version : The Internet has infected Politics like an outbreak of E. Coli
Squishy Cheeks
01-18-2007, 03:08 AM
This sounds more like an argument from the discussion board than something in congress (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pe4WA58rMu0)
The part about the "real Klingons" makes me laugh everytime.
Mirai Gen
01-18-2007, 03:52 AM
You know, I see his point, but I really think that he could have used actual goddamn history instead of Star Trek.
Squishy Cheeks
01-18-2007, 04:05 AM
but that wouldn't be as funny.
Dragonsbane
01-18-2007, 11:40 AM
Real Klingons would have won in Iraq...but instead of rebuilding it, they would conquer it in defiance of the Federation and claim it as part of their mighty empire.
Roy_D_Mylote
01-18-2007, 03:53 PM
I think this guy loses just because, using Star Trek to debate=lose.
Mirai Gen
01-18-2007, 08:09 PM
Generally, yes, but the internet praises him for being fucking hilarious.
POS Industries
01-20-2007, 01:55 PM
Also, it inspired this little nugget of joy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZND5TZHYzXA).
But I mean, seriously, Klingons? At least get your analogy straight before you walk out there and make a fool of yourself. Personally, I thought Cardassians would've been the better comparison...
Squishy Cheeks
01-20-2007, 02:08 PM
Finally someone posted that online.
adamark
01-20-2007, 03:22 PM
I don't see how a popular television series analogy is any more or less real or relevant than a historical analogy. Most people don't study history or have a firm grasp on it, while many people understand the ethical and moral implications of TV shows. The goal is to make a point and be understood. You can make a point using history but fail to convey your point to everyone.
Grandmaster_Skweeb
01-20-2007, 04:16 PM
I couldn't help myself.
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a48/GumboMcnasty/klingon.jpg
Mirai Gen
01-20-2007, 05:33 PM
I don't see how a popular television series analogy is any more or less real or relevant than a historical analogy. Most people don't study history or have a firm grasp on it, while many people understand the ethical and moral implications of TV shows. The goal is to make a point and be understood. You can make a point using history but fail to convey your point to everyone.
Like I said, I see his point, but did he ever stop and think about his words and how utterly hilarious they were? It just comes out as silly.
POS Industries
01-21-2007, 03:06 AM
Like I said, I see his point, but did he ever stop and think about his words and how utterly hilarious they were? It just comes out as silly.
I actually have to go with no, because it appeared to me that he was, in fact, winging it out there. I mean, to me, it's not even that he made a Star Trek analogy on the floor of the House of Representatives, but that he made a poor Star Trek analogy on the floor of the House of Representatives.
Dragonsbane
01-22-2007, 11:01 AM
I actually have to go with no, because it appeared to me that he was, in fact, winging it out there. I mean, to me, it's not even that he made a Star Trek analogy on the floor of the House of Representatives, but that he made a poor Star Trek analogy on the floor of the House of Representatives.
He should have stuck with Romulans.
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.