Rymramoch
06-10-2009, 12:32 AM
There has been a lot of discussion lately about Universal Health Care, if it is best for the country, and what form it should take if implemented. Almost all of the discussion is focused on insurance and payment rates as a means of cutting costs, but there is more that could be done: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande
( I would quote but it is 8 pages long)
Dr. Gawande's has some very valid points, which have apparently come to the attention of congress, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/09/us/politics/09health.html?_r=1&em, but I think they are missing the point. I don't see how blanket-style cuts will actually change anything, this is an issue that needs to be addressed institutionally, during medical training and so forth.
I am currently working for Mayo Clinic and personally believe that all hospitals etc. should be non-profit, so I am obviously biased and was wondering if anyone else had any thoughts on the matter.
( I would quote but it is 8 pages long)
Dr. Gawande's has some very valid points, which have apparently come to the attention of congress, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/09/us/politics/09health.html?_r=1&em, but I think they are missing the point. I don't see how blanket-style cuts will actually change anything, this is an issue that needs to be addressed institutionally, during medical training and so forth.
I am currently working for Mayo Clinic and personally believe that all hospitals etc. should be non-profit, so I am obviously biased and was wondering if anyone else had any thoughts on the matter.