Luna Santin
06-14-2004, 11:12 AM
Today, the Supreme Court voted 8-0 to dismiss Newsom's case against the phrase "under God" (thereby overturning the prior decision to remove the phrase) on the grounds that, currently being in a custody dispute with his daughter's mother, he does not have legal standing to speak for her. This outcome had been predicted by some as an easy out for the court to take by dismissing the case on a technicality rather than deciding on the issue.
CNN: Court dismisses Pledge case (http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/06/14/scotus.pledge.case.ap/index.html)
FOX: Supreme Court dismisses 'Pledge' case (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,122614,00.html)
...
BBC: US considers 'under God' pledge (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3564101.stm) (old story)
EDIT - BBC posted a new story. BBC: US to keep 'under God' pledge (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3806181.stm)
CNN: Court dismisses Pledge case (http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/06/14/scotus.pledge.case.ap/index.html)
FOX: Supreme Court dismisses 'Pledge' case (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,122614,00.html)
...
BBC: US considers 'under God' pledge (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3564101.stm) (old story)
EDIT - BBC posted a new story. BBC: US to keep 'under God' pledge (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3806181.stm)