Romantic quiz [Archive] - The Warring States of NPF

Technocrack

12-03-2004, 02:22 AM

http://www.damegames.com/quizzes/romance/ro.htm

Romanticism Assessment for Jimmy
Your Score is 55 Percent

You appear to have a well-balanced romantic self. While you may get flutters in your stomach when you meet someone you are very attracted to, you do not let your romantic-self entirely dictate how you proceed. You will ask yourself if there is a chance this relationship will work before allowing yourself to fall in love. Even if you feel a romantic connection is viable from a practical sense, you will not just allow yourself to be swept away.

You do not have many illusions about love. While you may feel a very deep attachment to someone, you know love rarely conquers all. You know successful relationships take work and compromise and a desire by those involved to make their relationship work. Candlelight dinners and words of endless love may be nice, but they don't pay the bills or get the dishes washed.

The middle ground on the romanticism scale is neither entirely safe nor entirely lackluster. However it does not carry the weight of a romantic failure based upon being swooped off your feet. Nor is the middle ground so devoid of romanticism that you feel like you are living with a sibling. Also, there is quite a bit of evidence that with your outlook on romanticism your relationship has a very good chance of succeeding.

BlackMageGirl!

12-03-2004, 02:30 AM

Results: 65%

Hmm...it appears that I'm well balanced when it comes to love.

Cloud Strife

12-03-2004, 02:31 AM

I took it and I got 75%. A romantic fool, it seems I am. ^_^;

Pixie

12-03-2004, 04:05 AM

I got a 55 too. Which is pretty true, I tend to keep my head on my shoulders in relationships. At least, most of the time. >..<

Funka Genocide

12-03-2004, 04:12 AM

60%?

thats total crap!

I'm the most romantic man alive! just ask all my ex-girlfriends...

wait a second!

stupid test which forces self introspection! 60%!

*shakes fists furiously at the cruel hand of romantic fate*

Dynamite220

12-03-2004, 04:40 AM

37%. I wish I could say that I was only mildly romantic, but I was just over the bar.

Thanatos

12-03-2004, 09:18 AM

I scored 54%, but I disagree of some of there ideas of romantic are.

Thaumaturge

12-03-2004, 09:47 AM

Hmm... my score was 43% - "You appear to have a well-balanced romantic self..." (continues as Technocrack's posted decription does).

Very interesting.

slightly aboveaverage man

12-03-2004, 10:04 AM

Romanticism Assessment for SAAM
Your Score is 84 Percent.

You appear to be quite romantic. It is possible someone you are attracted to easily sweeps you off your feet. You feel love really does conquer all and the problems couples face in everyday life will sort themselves out. You are not one to see any obstacles in the way of true love.

For you true love cannot be denied. True love must not only be acknowledged but served as well, and anything done in the name of love is a good thing. You may also feel that true love never dies--it has a will of its own.

Of course you may have, or will meet the perfect person and your relationship will verify all of your romantic feelings. On the other hand, your head over heels approach may result in disaster. You may find yourself involved with someone you are passionately attached to, but is so different from you that your true love seems almost alien in his or her behavior. Blind love may lead you to act impulsively and get you in a position from which it is difficult to escape. For instance, a woman may find herself pregnant with the child of a man who is no longer in her life at the time of the child's birth. While a high level of romanticism certainly carries some fabulous rewards, you may want to ask yourself if a relationship can really make you happy before you take any leaps from which it is not easy to return.

GatoFiero

12-03-2004, 10:54 AM

I got 23 Percent.

"Your score indicates you don't have much use for romanticism. You may well be very cynical towards the romantic. You may see any expression of romanticism as an overly effusive waste of time. If you do not have a disdain for relationships entirely, you certainly believe successful ones require hard work to build and maintain; they are not the product of some mystical pixie dust that mysteriously falls on two people when they happen to meet.

Your approach to love and relationships is very practical. You don't feel butterflies or loose your appetite when in the presence of someone you find attractive. You look at the bottom line: can this relationship work, and how well will it fulfill my needs. If the answer is yes, you might pursue the relationship in a very pragmatic way. Indeed, you will work to make the relationship successful. If the answer is no, then you will move on without looking back.

Of course there is the chance that sometime in the past you have been badly hurt by a relationship you thought perfect, and have become a cynic when it comes to romanticism. In this case you may want to consider getting back up on the horse that threw you, because it is likely you do feel a void with the lack of romanticism in your life. "

The Mirror Emperor

12-03-2004, 11:08 AM

I got 65 percent.

You appear to have a well-balanced romantic self. While you may get flutters in your stomach when you meet someone you are very attracted to, you do not let your romantic-self entirely dictate how you proceed. You will ask yourself if there is a chance this relationship will work before allowing yourself to fall in love. Even if you feel a romantic connection is viable from a practical sense, you will not just allow yourself to be swept away.

You do not have many illusions about love. While you may feel a very deep attachment to someone, you know love rarely conquers all. You know successful relationships take work and compromise and a desire by those involved to make their relationship work. Candlelight dinners and words of endless love may be nice, but they don't pay the bills or get the dishes washed.

The middle ground on the romanticism scale is neither entirely safe nor entirely lackluster. However it does not carry the weight of a romantic failure based upon being swooped off your feet. Nor is the middle ground so devoid of romanticism that you feel like you are living with a sibling. Also, there is quite a bit of evidence that with your outlook on romanticism your relationship has a very good chance of succeeding.

Meh...it's not like those other quizzes, where they definitely read your mind.

Aeria

12-03-2004, 01:01 PM

I got 76%, Quite romantic and all that... Which is true! It's the only way to live :D

Karrrrrrrrrrrresche

12-03-2004, 01:11 PM

Romanticism Assessment for gareth
Your Score is 41 Percent

You appear to have a well-balanced romantic self. While you may get flutters in your stomach when you meet someone you are very attracted to, you do not let your romantic-self entirely dictate how you proceed. You will ask yourself if there is a chance this relationship will work before allowing yourself to fall in love. Even if you feel a romantic connection is viable from a practical sense, you will not just allow yourself to be swept away.

You do not have many illusions about love. While you may feel a very deep attachment to someone, you know love rarely conquers all. You know successful relationships take work and compromise and a desire by those involved to make their relationship work. Candlelight dinners and words of endless love may be nice, but they don't pay the bills or get the dishes washed.

The middle ground on the romanticism scale is neither entirely safe nor entirely lackluster. However it does not carry the weight of a romantic failure based upon being swooped off your feet. Nor is the middle ground so devoid of romanticism that you feel like you are living with a sibling. Also, there is quite a bit of evidence that with your outlook on romanticism your relationship has a very good chance of succeeding.

i dunno i thought i weas gonna score more i feel lonely now :(

KaneInferno

12-03-2004, 01:12 PM

i got 78%

You appear to be quite romantic. It is possible someone you are attracted to easily sweeps you off your feet. You feel love really does conquer all and the problems couples face in everyday life will sort themselves out. You are not one to see any obstacles in the way of true love.

For you true love cannot be denied. True love must not only be acknowledged but served as well, and anything done in the name of love is a good thing. You may also feel that true love never dies--it has a will of its own.

Of course you may have, or will meet the perfect person and your relationship will verify all of your romantic feelings. On the other hand, your head over heels approach may result in disaster. You may find yourself involved with someone you are passionately attached to, but is so different from you that your true love seems almost alien in his or her behavior. Blind love may lead you to act impulsively and get you in a position from which it is difficult to escape. For instance, a woman may find herself pregnant with the child of a man who is no longer in her life at the time of the child's birth. While a high level of romanticism certainly carries some fabulous rewards, you may want to ask yourself if a relationship can really make you happy before you take any leaps from which it is not easy to return.

Elminster_Amaur

12-03-2004, 02:19 PM

Romanticism Assessment for Elminster
Your Score is 68 Percent

You appear to have a well-balanced romantic self. While you may get flutters in your stomach when you meet someone you are very attracted to, you do not let your romantic-self entirely dictate how you proceed. You will ask yourself if there is a chance this relationship will work before allowing yourself to fall in love. Even if you feel a romantic connection is viable from a practical sense, you will not just allow yourself to be swept away.

You do not have many illusions about love. While you may feel a very deep attachment to someone, you know love rarely conquers all. You know successful relationships take work and compromise and a desire by those involved to make their relationship work. Candlelight dinners and words of endless love may be nice, but they don't pay the bills or get the dishes washed.

The middle ground on the romanticism scale is neither entirely safe nor entirely lackluster. However it does not carry the weight of a romantic failure based upon being swooped off your feet. Nor is the middle ground so devoid of romanticism that you feel like you are living with a sibling. Also, there is quite a bit of evidence that with your outlook on romanticism your relationship has a very good chance of succeeding.

Bob The Mercenary

12-03-2004, 02:29 PM

I got 49%.

I'm part of this well-balanced breakfast. :cool:

Roland

12-03-2004, 02:32 PM

37%...

Well, it explains a few things...

Loneyes

12-03-2004, 07:21 PM

I got 80% It seems pretty accurate to me.

Zero

12-03-2004, 07:24 PM

56%, and the normal well-roundedness. I was expecting to get something low. Somewhat accurate, but there are more in-depth quizzes out there...

Skyshot

12-03-2004, 07:27 PM

"Your Score is 36 Percent

"You appear to have a well-balanced romantic self. While you may get flutters in your stomach when you meet someone you are very attracted to, you do not let your romantic-self entirely dictate how you proceed. You will ask yourself if there is a chance this relationship will work before allowing yourself to fall in love. Even if you feel a romantic connection is viable from a practical sense, you will not just allow yourself to be swept away.

"You do not have many illusions about love. While you may feel a very deep attachment to someone, you know love rarely conquers all. You know successful relationships take work and compromise and a desire by those involved to make their relationship work. Candlelight dinners and words of endless love may be nice, but they don't pay the bills or get the dishes washed.

"The middle ground on the romanticism scale is neither entirely safe nor entirely lackluster. However it does not carry the weight of a romantic failure based upon being swooped off your feet. Nor is the middle ground so devoid of romanticism that you feel like you are living with a sibling. Also, there is quite a bit of evidence that with your outlook on romanticism your relationship has a very good chance of succeeding."

Yeah, a very good chance of succeeding! How great is that, losers!

This sounds like a good assessment of my personality. I'm a cynic by logic, and would definitely analyze the female (no, not ogle her, you perverts) before making a move. "You do not have many illusions about love. While you may feel a very deep attachment to someone, you know love rarely conquers all " and "you do not let your romantic-self entirely dictate how you proceed. You will ask yourself if there is a chance this relationship will work before allowing yourself to fall in love. Even if you feel a romantic connection is viable from a practical sense, you will not just allow yourself to be swept away." is me all the way.

Dante

12-03-2004, 08:07 PM

Your Score is 45 Percent

You appear to have a well-balanced romantic self. While you may get flutters in your stomach when you meet someone you are very attracted to, you do not let your romantic-self entirely dictate how you proceed. You will ask yourself if there is a chance this relationship will work before allowing yourself to fall in love. Even if you feel a romantic connection is viable from a practical sense, you will not just allow yourself to be swept away.

You do not have many illusions about love. While you may feel a very deep attachment to someone, you know love rarely conquers all. You know successful relationships take work and compromise and a desire by those involved to make their relationship work. Candlelight dinners and words of endless love may be nice, but they don't pay the bills or get the dishes washed.

The middle ground on the romanticism scale is neither entirely safe nor entirely lackluster. However it does not carry the weight of a romantic failure based upon being swooped off your feet. Nor is the middle ground so devoid of romanticism that you feel like you are living with a sibling. Also, there is quite a bit of evidence that with your outlook on romanticism your relationship has a very good chance of succeeding

Bullshit.

Skyshot

12-03-2004, 08:18 PM

Ahem...Dante.

Not counting that quote, that post was one word. How, exactly, do you justify that word? Where do you get that a relationship at 45% (or 37%) romantic-ness from one party doesn't have a very good chance of succeeding? You should explain yourself a little further, so you don't look like a complete moron.

Lycanthrope

12-03-2004, 08:18 PM

60%. I half agree. In a sense, yes. I've seen things work. I've seen things not work. I've also seen enough to know that love means different things to different people, and being an abstract word in itself, its impossible to classify one's version of love as "right" or "wrong."

But what I do that this does not is make the distinction between "love" and "true love." True love happens when you meet someone who is completely and utterly compatable with your own version of love. But the proof for that is only in the outset. To someone who can't help himself but fool around with other women, true love may be finding someone that doesn't mind an open relationship. For most people, its just finding someone who is capable of completely forgiving their faults. Love is what you make of it. True love is when your loved one agrees.

I'm pragmatic about its classification, but a complete romantic when it comes to my own beliefs. Its just that my vision of what I want is a bit humbler than most.

Kitty Cannonade

12-03-2004, 08:34 PM

44%

I've got a D in romance. *cries*

Dante

12-03-2004, 09:16 PM

Not counting that quote, that post was one word. How, exactly, do you justify that word? Where do you get that a relationship at 45% (or 37%) romantic-ness from one party doesn't have a very good chance of succeeding? You should explain yourself a little further, so you don't look like a complete moron.

Yes, I should explain that one-word post.

However, I am not in the habit of vomiting the details of my personal life onto public messageboards. Suffice to say, if you don't know, you don't NEED to know. This is for the protection of all parties involved.

Skyshot

12-03-2004, 09:28 PM

Yes, I should explain that one-word post.

However, I am not in the habit of vomiting the details of my personal life onto public messageboards. Suffice to say, if you don't know, you don't NEED to know. This is for the protection of all parties involved.

In other words, you've had many failed relationships. You're not very subtle, are you? However, if you post the rather personal results of an online quiz, that kinda counts as at least belching up the details of your personal life.
Not to mention, it's a bit rude to deliberately give a public emotional response to something like that and not explain why. Now, talk!

Dante

12-03-2004, 09:44 PM

In other words, you've had many failed relationships. You're not very subtle, are you? However, if you post the rather personal results of an online quiz, that kinda counts as at least belching up the details of your personal life.

I posted one word. ONE WORD. How amazingly intelligent of you, being able to extrapolate the details of my life from one word. I am confronted by the new Jung. All hail his greatness.

*snort*

And because I post the results of a quiz anyone could have taken and gotten the same results for, I automatically "belch up the details of my personal life"?

You imbecile,go back 50-60 steps, run forward, do a double somersault and disappear up your own ass. You are a prime candidate for a retroactive abortion.

Not to mention, it's a bit rude to deliberately give a public emotional response to something like that and not explain why. Now, talk!

It's also quite rude to probe for details when someone doesn't intend to share them. Use that rusted, abandoned hamster wheel you call a brain for once.

Nosferatu

12-03-2004, 10:53 PM

DragonDaimyo

12-03-2004, 11:18 PM

Your Score is 49 Percent

You appear to have a well-balanced romantic self. While you may get flutters in your stomach when you meet someone you are very attracted to, you do not let your romantic-self entirely dictate how you proceed. You will ask yourself if there is a chance this relationship will work before allowing yourself to fall in love. Even if you feel a romantic connection is viable from a practical sense, you will not just allow yourself to be swept away.

You do not have many illusions about love. While you may feel a very deep attachment to someone, you know love rarely conquers all. You know successful relationships take work and compromise and a desire by those involved to make their relationship work. Candlelight dinners and words of endless love may be nice, but they don't pay the bills or get the dishes washed.

The middle ground on the romanticism scale is neither entirely safe nor entirely lackluster. However it does not carry the weight of a romantic failure based upon being swooped off your feet. Nor is the middle ground so devoid of romanticism that you feel like you are living with a sibling. Also, there is quite a bit of evidence that with your outlook on romanticism your relationship has a very good chance of succeeding.

Surprisingly accurate about me.

Krylo

12-03-2004, 11:27 PM

Sarda, leave Dante alone.

Dante, ignore Sarda, and stop insulting him. You're treading close to the flaming rule.

In other words, both you two learn to respect each other. Especially Dante's privacy. We sure as HELL don't need to hear about all the angst he has bottled up inside. Seriously. So yah, shut it.

Bob The Mercenary

12-03-2004, 11:35 PM

150%

Although you are an expert at the arts of love and love-making, you will never be acknowledged among the opposite gender because you do not fall into the mainstream and like stuff such as sports and the latest hit by Clay Aiken. You spend most of your time with the same friends, honing your skills at Halo 2 and Half-Life 2 among other games, and have a generally entertaining time. But, you remember that you don't need the opposite gender to accept you because, in the end, a girlfriend will never help you defend the Earth from invading aliens.

gurusloth

12-04-2004, 01:51 AM

... you two learn to respect each other. Especially Dante's privacy. We sure as HELL don't need to hear about all the angst he has bottled up inside...
I would like to know why he prefers using female anime characters as avatars, though.

Oh, and to remain on topic, I got a 41%.

adamark

12-04-2004, 01:58 AM

53% for me.

I think there are some biased questions.
I wonder who wrote this quiz.

QueenQeeko

12-04-2004, 06:29 AM

Romanticism Assessment for Qeeko
Your Score is 50 Percent

You appear to have a well-balanced romantic self. While you may get flutters in your stomach when you meet someone you are very attracted to, you do not let your romantic-self entirely dictate how you proceed. You will ask yourself if there is a chance this relationship will work before allowing yourself to fall in love. Even if you feel a romantic connection is viable from a practical sense, you will not just allow yourself to be swept away.

You do not have many illusions about love. While you may feel a very deep attachment to someone, you know love rarely conquers all. You know successful relationships take work and compromise and a desire by those involved to make their relationship work. Candlelight dinners and words of endless love may be nice, but they don't pay the bills or get the dishes washed.

The middle ground on the romanticism scale is neither entirely safe nor entirely lackluster. However it does not carry the weight of a romantic failure based upon being swooped off your feet. Nor is the middle ground so devoid of romanticism that you feel like you are living with a sibling. Also, there is quite a bit of evidence that with your outlook on romanticism your relationship has a very good chance of succeeding.