You should be thankful you're not named Sommer -- I had a huge crush on a girl with said name two years ago.
Also: I'm not stalking your posts history...I'm just, uhh...I'm doing research for the next chapter of my historical epic! Yes!!

That's exactly what I wanted to hear. :3

...Is that a challenge?
Because if that's a challenge, be prepared to read the greatest work of history in the history of all history.
...In fact, I might just skip ahead from November 2003 to April 10th, 2004. I hear that's an awfully important day for me to document.

Now I know what we're going to do. If I'm flatte, I mean impressed by your histories, then you've got a chance.

Precisely.
...And let's face it. You're all for this arrangement, because it means you have a mere chance with the sexiest historian since Herodotus.
Am I right or am I right?

Pfft, you just want me as a backup if you can't get into your barista-girl's knickers. *arching eyebrow*

Baaaaaahhh I can't even flirt effectively on the internet.
...Either that, or you're just playing hard to get.
...I choose to be naive enough to believe the latter!

Can't we be friends instead? :p

..Well, we'll just have to change that.

I suppose it's entirely possible I've been feeling guilty about our history and paid special attention to your posts, and that's why I spotted those mistakes. But I'm relatively certain whatever feelings I may have for you, they're not particularly romantic.

Do I come off as passive-aggressive? Better check that out. >_>

PS. I don't think the "loose" thing even qualifies as something wrong, it's just something an archery snob might point out which may had been useful if we had gone with an archerdwarf.