|
Click to unhide all tags.
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
09-28-2011, 12:02 AM | #1 |
Lakitu
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,648
|
Firefox needs to stop changing the default font
So I literally updated Firefox 5 minutes ago and now all of the text on the forums is in this new default setup (I have no clue what the original was, but it was different).
Anyone know what the default font was back during 6.X? This sudden change is really bugging me. |
09-28-2011, 12:05 AM | #2 |
Not a Taco
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,313
|
Times New Roman?
Edit: Though, the forum ought to have a stylesheet which tells it what fonts to use.
__________________
I did a lot of posting on here as a teenager, and I was pretty awful. Even after I learned, grew up, and came to be on the right side of a lot of important issues, I was still angry, abrasive, and generally increased the amount of hate in the world, in pretty unacceptable ways. On the off chance that someone is taking a trip down memory lane looking through those old threads, I wanted to devote my signature to say directly to you, I'm sorry. Thank you for letting me be better, NPF. Last edited by rpgdemon; 09-28-2011 at 12:09 AM. |
09-28-2011, 01:37 AM | #3 | |
synk-ism
|
lol @ FF versioning, btw
Quote:
Yup. So if the fonts look different for you, your copy of FF either is ignoring the CSS or pulling the wrong fonts (either overriding settings or just being dumb about it?). e: I just snagged v7 myself and so far it looks the same.
__________________
Find love.
Last edited by synkr0nized; 09-28-2011 at 01:44 AM. |
|
09-30-2011, 05:18 AM | #5 |
GHOST BOTTOMED DICK FACE
|
I just jumped from 4 to 7.
Why didn't I wait a week so my add-ons would've been up to date? Seriously, I hate not having all my extensions there to make my browsing experience that much less of a nightmare. |
09-30-2011, 07:33 AM | #6 |
Not a Taco
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,313
|
WHY DON'T THEIR NUMBERS MAKE SENSE?!
__________________
I did a lot of posting on here as a teenager, and I was pretty awful. Even after I learned, grew up, and came to be on the right side of a lot of important issues, I was still angry, abrasive, and generally increased the amount of hate in the world, in pretty unacceptable ways. On the off chance that someone is taking a trip down memory lane looking through those old threads, I wanted to devote my signature to say directly to you, I'm sorry. Thank you for letting me be better, NPF. |
09-30-2011, 10:50 AM | #7 |
synk-ism
|
Versioning: Totes arbitrary.
They didn't want to seem "behind" Opera, MSIE, and Chrome.
__________________
Find love.
|
09-30-2011, 03:19 PM | #8 |
Doesn't care anymore
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,429
|
Because the version progression of 4.X-> 5.X-> 6.X-> 7.X is obviously highly illogical and a conspiracy.
Anywho, jumping from 4 to 7 is always going to break something. Especially in the case of addons that don't sound like they've been keeping up with mozilla. Or cut down on the amount of addon being used. Less addons generally means less headaches. Majority of the addons just add more bloat to firefox' already hefty footprint. |
09-30-2011, 08:24 PM | #9 |
The Straightest Shota
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: It's a secret to everybody.
Posts: 17,789
|
Firefox actually has a pretty small footprint. The only reason it seems large is that it has ram caching on by default, but it's a simple boolean toggle in the options you can turn off. It makes it a bit slower and use a bit more HD space (as these are the reasons it is on by default, alongside making your HD work less/last longer, especially in the case of SSDs) but cuts the system footprint by a ton.
Not that it actually matters if you're using a computer under 10 years old, as even its large footprint from the RAM caching can be absorbed by most decent newer machines without incident, even while running games and what as well. Chrome, at least, owes a large portion of its small footprint to having RAM caching off by default. EDIT: On original topic, a system restart righted the fonts after updating for me, though I know what you are talking about, Aldie.
__________________
Last edited by Krylo; 09-30-2011 at 08:29 PM. |
10-01-2011, 05:13 AM | #10 | |
synk-ism
|
Yes, Mozilla. You totally need over agig of RAM to show one web page.
Quote:
It does have the reputation of being dumb about it, though. If you just leave FF running and check your machine later, you'll see that it's just continued sucking up RAM like it's going out of style. Or at least it did. I have not checked this in versions past 4 (or 5?), as I don't leave the browser running when I am not using it and haven't been curious in a while.
__________________
Find love.
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|