Military to Allow Benefits to Same Sex Domestic Partnerships

[Overcast]

Originally Posted by CNN

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced just days before leaving office that the Pentagon is extending some benefits to the same-sex partners of service members.

Same-sex partners who sign a military "Declaration of Domestic Partnership" form will be eligible for several benefits, including military identification cards as dependents.

This would allow them unescorted status on bases, access to commissaries, and the right to visit their partners in military hospitals.

They will also be able to receive many survivor benefits, including life insurance payments.

The Pentagon believes there may be 5,600 troops on active duty seeking such benefits, as well as 3,400 National Guard troops and 8,000 retirees.

Marine Corps to spouse clubs: Allow same-sex members or you don't operate on base

The changes are expected to go into affect no later than October 1, 2013.

The move had been expected for weeks and is widely seen as part of Panetta's effort to finish as much as he can in extending benefits to gays and lesbians before leaving the Pentagon.

Facing legal limitations around the Defense of Marriage Act, some benefits will not be extended. This includes health care coverage, Pentagon officials said.

"One of the legal limitations to providing all benefits at this time is the Defense of Marriage Act, which is still the law of the land. There are certain benefits that can only be provided to spouses as defined by that law, which is now being reviewed by the United States Supreme Court," Panetta said in a statement.

The Defense of Marriage Act defines marriage as that between a man and a woman. Federal courts have ruled it unconstitutional and the Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal.

Pentagon officials briefing reporters on the change also said the agency did not extend housing benefits to same sex-couples.

This was due in part to feedback from troops who felt they might have problems getting military housing, which is in short supply at times. But there may also be legal issues to be resolved before such housing can be granted.

A good thing, but still not enough in my heart. Reading into the memo as the person I am I still note that our benefits given while notable as no longer being NOTHING are still lacking by comparison to a 'proper' marriage thanks to the still existing dogma of the DOMA. While I am happy for the folks I know who are married and have gone as far as they have with nothing all this really does is remind me that things are still far from over.

[pochercoaster]

It's a step, which is good, but yeah DOMA really, really needs to be repealed.

I'm not terribly familiar with the history of DOMA but wiki says it's been in effect since 1996 and despite numerous challenges it still stands. Ugh. There's a supreme court case coming up next month though.