Who would win if it were up to us?

[Less Than jake]

Yes it is now officially Bush's second term. Being a Democrat yesterday was sort of a day to mourn. BUt who would've won here?

[Robot Jesus]

I think nadir would have been the best choice. He could help the US catch up with the rest of the world socaly.

I voted W, I was no way in hell gonna vote for kerry, he would run our economy into the ground just as bush has started to fix all the problems with it. Plus Kerry voted against the law that banned partial birth abortions. And even though Kerry was just a puppet of the democratic party to try and get bush out of the office, puppets still have power

[Dynamite220]

I voted Bush. I'm not realy into the whole social conservative thing, but I know when a man is serious. He is doing what he thinks is best for his country. Others may not agree with him, but his motivations are pure. Also, while I may not be anti-gay or anti-abortion, I am a political conservative who is all for small government, lower taxes, and trickle-down economics, all of which are Bush positions.

[Sock_Munkey]

Originally Posted by Lucerin Red

he would run our economy into the ground just as bush has started to fix all the problems with it.

Hvae you noticed the 37 trillion dollar deficit bush has created? Hes a total dumbass.

War = expensive, but I was talking more along the lines of our economic polices and the recession we hit and the rise of unemployement.

Also yeah, I am definitely for smaller government, I hate loosing literally close to half my pay to taxes

[Vicious]

Not Bush. He refuses to admit when he's wrong. For some reason, I know a few people that somehow see this as a positive quality.

Anybody but Bush '05, baby.

[Dynamite220]

Originally Posted by Vicious

Not Bush. He refuses to admit when he's wrong. For some reason, I know a few people that somehow see this as a positive quality.

Anybody but Bush '05, baby.

He doesn't admit that he's wrong because he doesn't believe that he's wrong. If you stated an oppinion of yours and someone said that you were obviously wrong and demanded you apologise, would you, even though your oppinion is just as lagitamate as his?

[Vicious]

Originally Posted by Dynamite220

He doesn't admit that he's wrong because he doesn't believe that he's wrong. If you stated an oppinion of yours and someone said that you were obviously wrong and demanded you apologise, would you, even though your oppinion is just as lagitamate as his?

If my obviously wrong opinion directly led to the invasion of a country and over one thousand lost American lives, not to mention several thousand Iraqi civilian deaths, then, yes, I would apologize.

[Dynamite220]

1. No oppinion is wrong. It goes against the meaning of the word and the nature of the consept for an oppinion to be wrong. That doesn't mean that all oppinions must be the same. It just means that from different points of view, something different applies.

2. When you are a leader, sometimes you must decide who dies so that others might live. Playing god in this way is not fun, nobody likes doing it, and nobody likes the people who do it. It must be done by someone, however, as is the nature of man and government and that he was willing to make those choices promptly, based on his own principles, and despite the impopularity of his decision shows a depth of character which you or I have not lived long enough to be able to show.

In shorter terms, if you would not repeat the invasion, it means that you have a different oppinion; not that your oppinion is inherently better because less and/or different people die from it. (It is my personal oppinion that, based on evidence found in Iraq, there would be two Iraq citizens dead just from Husain's special treatment for every war death so far. There is no way to proove it, that is just what I choose to believe.)