05-11-2012, 04:22 PM | #131 | ||
War Incarnate
|
Loki himself is not very threatening (he's essentially a bratty teenager with abandonment issues trying to steal his older brothers toys), but the things he plans are threatening. Mainly because his plans all involve manipluating people who actually are dangerous into causing random chaos so he can take advantage of it. He is a trickster god after all.
Of course, if his threat level seems lower in this movie, it's only because he wasn't really the one in charge of the invasion plan, it was Thanos who wanted to unleash the Chitauri on earth, and he didn't seem all that put out when they failed, probably because to Thanos, both Loki and the Chitauri are simply expendable mooks and this invasion is merely a test of earths defenses.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-11-2012, 06:09 PM | #132 | ||
Speed-Suit
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bronies are the new Steampunk
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
05-11-2012, 06:51 PM | #133 | ||
War Incarnate
|
Ultimately yes, he wants the
Thanos literally loses nothing with this plan, except an army, but his army is meaningless, since he's way more dangerous than every single thing the Avengers faced in that whole film. The Avengers think they've won a great victory, but they know nothing, they don't even suspect that there IS a big bad coming to kill them all.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-11-2012, 07:15 PM | #134 |
Archer and Armstrong vs. the World
|
Loki's machiavellian scheming would probably have made him a better leader than Thor but Thor is all like, honorable, or whatever, so he wins because good is dumb but also has a super hammer. This inadequacy of Loki's makes him seek power in whatever place he can find it, and also become an egotistical douchebag who wants people to worship him.
__________________
The Valiant Review |
05-11-2012, 09:11 PM | #135 |
Sent to the cornfield
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Myself
Posts: 212
|
No like Mjolnir is a totally legit reason to win pretty much anything. Its a wincon with a nifty leather thong.
Also that random girl in the Hiddleston dance gif needs to mover her ass so we can all get a better look at Mark-motherfucking-Hiddleston getting down. |
05-12-2012, 12:48 AM | #136 |
of Northwest Arizona
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 1,492
|
Tom. Tom Hiddleston.
|
05-12-2012, 02:19 AM | #137 |
Sent to the cornfield
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Myself
Posts: 212
|
Mark sounds better.
(Also no idea why I thought it was Mark.) |
05-12-2012, 02:23 AM | #138 |
of Northwest Arizona
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 1,492
|
No, my name isn't Mark. What on earth gave you that idea?
It's probably because Mark is the most attractive male name.
|
05-13-2012, 01:18 AM | #139 |
Please Be Well
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,715
|
Was dicking around on IMDb, and did you guys realize that Evans and Hiddleston were born in '81, Hemsworth in '83, and Johansson in '84? That blows my goddamn mind. When did our generation become age-appropriate for superheroes? When did I get old? >.<
__________________
|
05-13-2012, 01:28 AM | #140 |
of Northwest Arizona
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 1,492
|
What do you mean "our" generation, old man?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|