Soldiers of Light: Mafia

[The Wandering God]

Originally Posted by Silly Kitty

DarthMauler hasn't been around for very long. I think a miscount is just an honest mistake and has absolutely nothing to do with the game, other than it being a miscount about the game.

Indeed, which is why it wasn't a vote. But we are already talking about why MoM bit the dust, because of his role in a previous game. That's ultra-super-duper-metagaming right there.

And before things go any further, I just want to ask that no one ever defend me. EVER. Seriously. I'll stand up for myself. I don't want those complications. Or having it lead to the lynching of innocent people by mafiates manipulating how the posts went.

The Wandering God

[Mesden]

Alright, so there are no more complaints I am saying this right now.

IF YOU DID NOT GET A PM FOR A ROLE, YOU HAVE NO ROLE! YOU ARE A LITTLE TEMPLE ALLIGNED MONK! JUST LIKE A TOWNIE!

[Inbred Chocobo]

Originally Posted by The_Wandering_God

Well, here we are again.

I for one would be seriously suspect of anyone who roleclaimed this early in the game. At the very least, who'd want that sort of attention.

Unfortunately, the past has shown whoever points the first finger is considered suspect themselves. Ironic, huh?

So, that means a lot of people will just sit on their thumbs, waiting for someone else to make the first move.

I am going to FoS DarthMauler64 for that pretty important error. Seriously dude, miscounting the mafia? Do I even need to explain why that has a whiff of something about it?

Of course, this draws attention to me. So, uh yeah. *does a dance*

Yeah, I wil admit it is true what you said TWG, but it seems kind of strange to me you would go ahead and point that out. So I'll do the whole FoS TWG for now, because I'll admit that isn't much to go on.

[catlover20410]

Ugh. He miscounted the mafia as one less than they actually are, so it is possible we have a case of "Forgot to count himself" syndrome here, but maybe not.

Right now, here's the options.

Voting DarthMauler or anyone else acting funky
Pros
We may take out an enemy early.
It gets something done.
If we goof, it's only one person.
We show the Mafia that we mean business.

Cons
If the person who is acting funny isn't actually an enemy, we ARE killing one of our own
The person may be acting funny because they're the PO, Vig, or one of the Masons, in which case we are taking out a powerful ally.


Voting No Lynch
Pros
We don't end up accidentally killing off someone who is on our side.
We get a little longer to try and decide.

Cons
We miss a chance to take out a potential enemy.
At most, we're only buying ourselves an extra day.
Nothing is getting done, and we show the Mafia that we're too weak to make a decision without substantial proof.

____________________________

I, for one, feel like getting something done.


Vote: Darthmauler


Also, I would like to remind people that the people who had roles in one game may not have that role in another game. I mean, seriously, what is wrong with you people, thinking that roles in a previous game have anything to do with it?

[Silly Kitty]

Now now, we are not gonna lynch someone just to get something done.

What do we know about Darthmauler other than he miscounted the mafia? Let's just wait for better clues.

[Mesden]

*Sigh* Ok people, another mini rant.

ROLES ARE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED! IT DOESN'T MATTER! YOU MAY WANT TO BELIEVE OTHERWISE, BUT IT IS A RANDOM PICK!

I want any more of this stuff settled as fast as possible. If you have a complaint tell me RIGHT NOW.

All of this mafia from last game didn't like MoM should have no relivence here. I have already stated (Me, the GO, the person that does not want to get involved game wise) that last games mafia should have nothing to do with this ones.

It is a completely different game and I hope you can treat it as such.

------------------------------------------------
VOTE UPDATE!

No Lynch:
Sillykitty

DarthMauler64:
Catlover

NO DEADLINE YET! EXPECT ONE TO BE SET SOMTIME TUESDAY MORNING.

[MasterOfMagic]

Well, regardless of whether or not you want it to be completely seperate or not, people are going to look back at the last game and see how people acted back then. And if any grudges were created (as in this case, I guess...). Examining people's thought processes are a part of this game, so people have to take everything into account. Nothing to get upset over, really...

[The Wandering God]

Originally Posted by Inbred Chocobo

Yeah, I wil admit it is true what you said TWG, but it seems kind of strange to me you would go ahead and point that out. So I'll do the whole FoS TWG for now, because I'll admit that isn't much to go on.

If by "strange" you mean, pointing out the completely obvious, I was only doing so to justify my actions and illustrate that I knew exactly what I was getting myself into.

Originally Posted by catlover20410

Ugh. He miscounted the mafia as one less than they actually are, so it is possible we have a case of "Forgot to count himself" syndrome here, but maybe not.
*snip*
I, for one, feel like getting something done.


Vote: Darthmauler


Also, I would like to remind people that the people who had roles in one game may not have that role in another game.

Actually I put some more thought into it. Why would anyone bother to do the calculation and not double check the numbers? Especially when he managed to get the 29 left part right. It isn't a matter of a typo, it's a matter of, "Hm, what numbers are needed to prove my point?"

Even with that, I'm still saying holding off on voting. If nothing else, I have a suggestion. Anyone who doesn't post before the end of the day, we lynch. At worst, we'll lose an inactive player (I personally hate those), and at best, we'll hit a mafia trying to hide in the shadows.

Just a suggestion. What do you guys think?

The Wandering God

[The Wizard Who Did It]

Originally Posted by Mesden

All of this mafia from last game didn't like MoM should have no relivence here. I have already stated (Me, the GO, the person that does not want to get involved game wise) that last games mafia should have nothing to do with this ones.

I would like to mention that any Mafia has relevance to this one. We can't change the past. The fact that MoM is a threat and maybe will be a threat has lots of significance. However, since anybody could read the threads, there is no guarentee that only people that were in the other game want him dead. Therefore, that should have no weight on our decision.

Also, I want to hear Darthmauler's explanation before I vote. Miscounting at 4 is pretty... yeah.

For the record, 4/29= 13.79%, and 5/29= 17.24%.

[Mesden]

Originally Posted by The Wizard Who Did It

I would like to mention that any Mafia has relevance to this one. We can't change the past. The fact that MoM is a threat and maybe will be a threat has lots of significance. However, since anybody could read the threads, there is no guarentee that only people that were in the other game want him dead. Therefore, that should have no weight on our decision.

Alright Twid, I will give you leeway on this this time as I never said so, but if I do go out of my way to state something it is in your best interest game wise to read it, get it and leave it at that.

I do not like to interfere with the game, but I will when such a situation arises that says, "MoM was the PO last game so he was killed because he was likely to be the PO this game and the mafia were scared."

One, as you can see MoM was not the PO. This is random, it will ALWAYS be random.

Two, the way last game was played can be of relivence, but saying that how the roles were assigned in a completely different game should not. EVER.