Stargate SG1 Mafia

[Mesden]

Originally Posted by Bungalobill6

I have a few points for this.
I didn't consider twiddy's post when i said that was why not to attack you. The reason is that it spirals out of control too fast. Lok at all the pages that it took.
I was just complaining about the grammar i have the same problem. I was really frustrated with the position that I am in. It is going to be very tough to win as the town.
I only had one actual problem and it wasn't that you voted for greed or counted the votes wrong. It was just one really confusing sentence. A good expanation of that sentence and I wouldn't have done this.
Also, it made me reread the whole thread and still not get what you were saying.
All that I really said was I'm going to
UNVOTE: Mesden

What else do I need to explain?! Jeez, I've gone step by little step about what I did and what happened.

Greed, one of the voters of IC, actually had two votes on him when I said 1. I forgot one of the votes. That person, who I did indeed forget, was Ogianres.

So now, what is the name of this entire process? Examining people that voted for IC. What part of this process was the ONLY part I forgot? When Ogianres voted for Greed.

Let me tell you why that is relevant.

Greed, supposedly, voted for IC because he didn't want to get lynched. The more votes on IC, the less likely he is to have more votes.

Understand yet? Please, everyone else, tell me my entire reasoning isn't insane and impossible to understand. I'd really like to know if I was making sense at all.

[Roy_D_Mylote]

It's perfectly sane and very possible to understand.

[IHateMakingNames]

Vote: Roy

Because he posted last, and I don't want to read everything.

[The Wizard Who Did It]

Originally Posted by Cephrir

Right. But she's also usually scum. So, I think that maybe it is a tad suspicious. Just making a point, not an FoS.

BAD CEPHRIR! She hasn't been scum in a while.

Originally Posted by Mesden

Understand yet? Please, everyone else, tell me my entire reasoning isn't insane and impossible to understand. I'd really like to know if I was making sense at all.

See, it probably made sense at one time or another... but I have no clue what you're talking about anymore, as it's such a minor point. As such, no, you make no sense whatsoever

[Mesden]

Fine. For, what I hope, can be a finale to this silly thing.

Bill asked me of this , "I forgot Ogi's in the process of picking who of the IC voters"

Now, that might be confusing when you read it, but only because it's out of context.

I was running through the people that had bandwagon'd onto IC. One of these people were Greed.

With me so far? Hope so.

Now, greed's excuse to completely bandwagon was for 'self preservation'. Correct? Now then, I, in my accusation of Greed, said that there was no need to get up in arms about self preservation with only ONE vote on him.

This was my mistake. He had 2 votes on him. I had forgotten Ogianres' original, what I assume was, random vote.

Now then. There was this entire process. We will name it "Examining the people who voted for IC". Greed's self preservation ploy for bandwagoning was a smaller part of this. And as an even smaller part was my missing of Ogianres vote.

So, in the process of examining the voters for IC, I forgot about Ogianres's vote on Greed, which supposedly helped prompt Greed to vote for IC.

I'm not saying this anymore. That's it. If you don't understand, then I can't do any better than I already have.

[Skyshot]

Vote: Roy

Because he posted last, and I don't want to read everything.

Dude. I mean, seriously.

Originally Posted by The Wizard Who Did It

BAD CEPHRIR! She hasn't been scum in a while.

So, you're saying she's due? :shifty:

Originally Posted by Mesden

Fine. For, what I hope, can be a finale to this silly thing.

Yes, can we please move on to something else?

[Death by Stabbing]

Originally Posted by Roy_D_Mylote

Why does DbS seem so terribly suspicious to me? Is it because everything he says comes off as ill-thought-out attempts to lynch people that have done nothing wrong? Yes. That is it.

Explain.

No.

Roy you have accused just as many people as me and all I did was say that people were suspicious...I haven't even voted yet...So what's your excuse for all of your accusations?

[Fenris]

Originally Posted by Death by Stabbing

No.

Roy you have accused just as many people as me and all I did was say that people were suspicious...I haven't even voted yet...So what's your excuse for all of your accusations?

I'm sorry, when told to explain, "No" is not a proper answer.

Now, explain.

EDIT: Also, you completely ignored my post.

[Skyshot]

Honestly, it seems to me like he did explain it, sort of. He accused his accuser of the exact same thing. And the "no" could be in response to "Yes. That is it."

DBS, you better be a townie. If you're not, I'm so getting lynched.

[Death by Stabbing]

Originally Posted by FenrisWolf

I'm sorry, when told to explain, "No" is not a proper answer.

Now, explain.

EDIT: Also, you completely ignored my post.

My answer is still no.
I have expained in my other post I'm not expaining again


and also interms of your previous

And clearly because you feel like you have to defend your self from only a finger of suspison means that you have something to hide...

so is that ok or am I going to have to explain myself further?