Stargate SG1 Mafia - Page 29

***Fenris*** · 09-28-2006, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mesden

Oh and SCREW YOU TOO MAFIA. =P I was probably a horrible BG anyhow. *Shrug*

You forget, you saved my ass twice.

Sithdarth · 09-28-2006, 07:06 AM

Actually she didn't. There are several passive roles that I have told no one at all about. They do interesting things. However, I really wanted them to effect gameplay only by being activated by a certain set of circumstances. You know instead of causing people to radically change their play style. Now you know but I still don't want to tell anyone, even the people with them, about them.

Edit: Just to make it clear I was looking for a way to tell you this for a few days. This just seemed to be a good time for it.

Moogle0119 · 09-28-2006, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mesden

You fail to mention the largest advocater against the IC bandwagon.

ME. You know, the person who has just been revealed as a townie,

I did.... in post 274....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moogle0119

However it wasn't anything too bad and he was mostly just stating the obvious. It all started to fall in line though on the 3rd page with IC defending himself, then Silly Kitty, Newb, Twiddy, and Mesden following in the defense. Now obviously with IC dead as mafia and Newb dead as cult leader that leads us with Silly Kitty, Twiddy, and Mesden (who OBVIOUSLY isn't a threat unless the BG now has changed into a murderous townie who switched sides; aka not likely at all). So now we're down to Silly Kitty and Twiddy as for who got defensive of the bandwagoning.

I just didn't restate the fact that I thought that since you're obviously the BG there's no way you'd be in cahoots with scum. Likewise I didn't bother mentioning Newb either (because he's dead and his role has already been revealed).

There's 15 players left (assuming I counted correctly); 3 of them are mafia, 1 is the serial killer, and any number of secret roles.

Just going off of what we know though, Mesden IS the BG and FenrisWolf is NOT mafia. FenrisWolf can't be mafia since he was protected like the BG does so I'm assuming both attempted hits were FROM the mafia vote and there's no reason a mafia would kill off their own member with their night role (voting for them during the day is a COMPLETELY different story). Meaning FenrisWolf is either townie or serial killer (1/15 chance of him being scum). Mesden is the BG (0/15 chance of her being scum.....unless her role change was to something bad?) Everyone else in the game currently has about a 4/15 chance of being scum. Honestly it's probably closer to 4/14 since Mesden isn't scum so we can reduce the number of suspected players by 1.

......

I really don't know where I'm going with this anymore....just laying out all the facts I guess and seeing if anyone comes up with anything. Any ideas anyone?

***Fenris*** · 09-28-2006, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sithdarth

Actually she didn't. There are several passive roles that I have told no one at all about. They do interesting things. However, I really wanted them to effect gameplay only by being activated by a certain set of circumstances. You know instead of causing people to radically change their play style. Now you know but I still don't want to tell anyone, even the people with them, about them.

Edit: Just to make it clear I was looking for a way to tell you this for a few days. This just seemed to be a good time for it.

Ah, sweet. I thought that might be the case.

Sithdarth · 09-29-2006, 07:02 AM

So then all the active people died?

Moogle0119 · 09-29-2006, 10:17 AM

It's been well over a day since any relevant posts have been made to finding out who the remaining scum are OR discussion on it. I will be voting soon if Sithdarth puts up a deadline and it remains quiet in here.

Cephrir · 09-29-2006, 01:31 PM

OK, we need to get a conversation going. FoS: Everyone. Defend yourselves.

Moogle0119 · 09-29-2006, 02:36 PM

Consider myself defended.......huzzah!

In all seriousness though....I will be giving out two FoS because free will says I can along with the reasons below

1) FoS: Twiddy. My reasoning? 2 of the 3 people I originally pointed to (Cephrir and Silly Kitty) immediately put up a similar defense which not only made sense, but cut straight to the point. My FoS remains since Twiddy has still not brought up a defense yet. Whether it's due to apathy or desire to lay low, I'm calling Twiddy out.

2) FoS: IHateMakingNames. Main reason for this vote? Lurking like a mo-fo. I called him out earlier with a FoS due to his inactivity and his response was to vote for Newb and hasn't been heard from since. I have also noticed that while I am at the boards I have seen his name being active under the members list. I can only assume that he either a) lacks the interest to post here unless called out or b) he's scum, and he's trying to lie low

I am calling these two out for their defenses. If anyone has any other suggestions or names please feel free to contribute.

Roy_D_Mylote · 09-29-2006, 03:20 PM

I don't see anyone acting particularly bad. IHMN always lurks. Twiddy's lurkerizing is kinda suspicious, but I just don't know.

***Fenris*** · 09-29-2006, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy_D_Mylote

Twiddy's lurkerizing is kinda suspicious, but I just don't know.

Not really. Twid always lurks nowadays.

09-28-2006, 07:06 AM	#282
Sithdarth Friendly Neighborhood Quantum Hobo Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Outside the M-brane look'n in Posts: 5,403	Actually she didn't. There are several passive roles that I have told no one at all about. They do interesting things. However, I really wanted them to effect gameplay only by being activated by a certain set of circumstances. You know instead of causing people to radically change their play style. Now you know but I still don't want to tell anyone, even the people with them, about them. Edit: Just to make it clear I was looking for a way to tell you this for a few days. This just seemed to be a good time for it. Last edited by Sithdarth; 09-28-2006 at 08:04 AM.

09-29-2006, 01:31 PM	#287
Cephrir With no _s! Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: In the wild. Posts: 24	OK, we need to get a conversation going. FoS: Everyone. Defend yourselves. __________________ :rmage: See, anytime you do anything, the_e is a one in twenty chance that you will c_itically fail.

09-29-2006, 03:20 PM	#289
Roy_D_Mylote Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: The sky. Posts: 1,030	I don't see anyone acting particularly bad. IHMN always lurks. Twiddy's lurkerizing is kinda suspicious, but I just don't know. __________________ I hate roleclaims.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-29-2006, 07:02 AM	#285
Sithdarth Friendly Neighborhood Quantum Hobo Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Outside the M-brane look'n in Posts: 5,403	So then all the active people died?

09-29-2006, 10:17 AM	#286
Moogle0119 The REAL Lord of the Dance Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Narshe Caves Posts: 397	It's been well over a day since any relevant posts have been made to finding out who the remaining scum are OR discussion on it. I will be voting soon if Sithdarth puts up a deadline and it remains quiet in here.

09-29-2006, 02:36 PM	#288
Moogle0119 The REAL Lord of the Dance Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Narshe Caves Posts: 397	Consider myself defended.......huzzah! In all seriousness though....I will be giving out two FoS because free will says I can along with the reasons below 1) FoS: Twiddy. My reasoning? 2 of the 3 people I originally pointed to (Cephrir and Silly Kitty) immediately put up a similar defense which not only made sense, but cut straight to the point. My FoS remains since Twiddy has still not brought up a defense yet. Whether it's due to apathy or desire to lay low, I'm calling Twiddy out. 2) FoS: IHateMakingNames. Main reason for this vote? Lurking like a mo-fo. I called him out earlier with a FoS due to his inactivity and his response was to vote for Newb and hasn't been heard from since. I have also noticed that while I am at the boards I have seen his name being active under the members list. I can only assume that he either a) lacks the interest to post here unless called out or b) he's scum, and he's trying to lie low I am calling these two out for their defenses. If anyone has any other suggestions or names please feel free to contribute.