09-29-2011, 03:00 AM | #31 |
Pure joy
|
Anyway things seem to be going rather swimmingly well in this regard lately! I just put some updates into some rules threads that should reflect the current situation better, and I think we can very well carry on like this.
|
09-29-2011, 03:05 AM | #32 |
FRONT KICK OF DOOM!
|
So when did we get a news "sobforum?"
|
09-29-2011, 03:24 AM | #33 |
adorable
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,950
|
Aw, I liked it being a sobforum...
__________________
this post is about how to successfully H the Kimmy
|
09-29-2011, 06:20 AM | #34 |
Argus Agony
|
Awww, we lost the sobforum?
I quit.
__________________
Either you're dead or my watch has stopped. |
09-29-2011, 06:30 AM | #35 |
Pure joy
|
Remember when we had you sign that thing in your own blood? Yeah the specifics are a little technical and very complex but it basically boils down to "no you don't."
|
09-29-2011, 06:34 AM | #36 |
Pure joy
|
Oh also guys: I'm taking everything you said about the backseat modding rule into account; basically it was never intended to keep you from asking people to, I dunno, write better or include more sources but I can also see how you took it that way, at the same time I want to both keep that rule in place and not make it too vague by including lots of situational qualifiers and examples. Sooo I dunno I guess that's gonna stay as it is for the moment but it's noted that there's an issue.
|
09-29-2011, 09:19 PM | #37 |
synk-ism
|
I liked it better that way, too.
It occurs to me that "sobforum" may have been intentional and not just an error.
Regardless... *whistles nonchalantly*
__________________
Find love.
|
|
|