05-13-2012, 10:16 PM | #161 | |
Argus Agony
|
Quote:
I definitely second the call to have Timm, Dini and co. take over DC's live action projects. They got lucky when they put Nolan in charge of Batman because all he really did was make some gritty crime dramas and throw Batman into them, which is all you need to do to make some decent Batman, and even then it's still kinda shitty when compared to actually good Batman stories. But WB doesn't get that, so they're trying to do the same thing by making a gritty crime drama and throwing Superman into it, which is a fucking terrible idea.
__________________
Either you're dead or my watch has stopped. |
|
05-13-2012, 10:29 PM | #162 | ||
of Northwest Arizona
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 1,492
|
Quote:
Quote:
Warner Bros. doesn't really get what Superman is. He's just a property to them. A Superman movie should not be gritty in the slightest. It can be dark at times but it should always be optimistic. If they really wanted to make a good reboot of Superman then they would have set about adapting Birthright with a good director attached to it, not someone who can crank out a piece of shit in time for them to maintain certain rights and avoid paying more to the estate of the people that fucking created the whole thing. |
||
05-14-2012, 04:57 AM | #163 | ||
War Incarnate
|
I think what we all want really though, deep down inside, is a proper live action Squirrel Girl movie.
You know this to be true.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-14-2012, 07:08 AM | #164 | ||
Speed-Suit
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bronies are the new Steampunk
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
05-14-2012, 11:36 AM | #165 | |
Not a Taco
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,313
|
Quote:
In general though, I hate 3D, because of how it makes all the colors washed out, when you look through the glasses at them.
__________________
I did a lot of posting on here as a teenager, and I was pretty awful. Even after I learned, grew up, and came to be on the right side of a lot of important issues, I was still angry, abrasive, and generally increased the amount of hate in the world, in pretty unacceptable ways. On the off chance that someone is taking a trip down memory lane looking through those old threads, I wanted to devote my signature to say directly to you, I'm sorry. Thank you for letting me be better, NPF. |
|
05-14-2012, 12:01 PM | #166 |
wat
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,177
|
The 3D in Avengers is cheap post-production shit. Maybe half of the scenes are actually 3D and even then, weakly so. There's a few decent shots of it but overall, as per usual, 3D is a shitty gimmicky experience. Money that had been pumped into just making the screen higher resolution, more vibrant, better surround sound, comfier seats, would have been infinitely better.
|
05-14-2012, 12:18 PM | #167 | |
:3
|
Ironman's HUD looked pretty neat but... that's about the only thing I liked about 3D in that movie.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
05-14-2012, 12:34 PM | #168 |
That's so PC of you
|
the iron Mand HUD was in 3D? I Honestly didn't noticed! They only scenes i actually recall the 3D kicking in are Panoramic shots, Loki's appearance with captain america, and certain parts of the final battle.
|
05-14-2012, 02:04 PM | #169 | ||
War Incarnate
|
I've given 3d a chance several times, and I can honestly say it has never done anything for me on any level. In fact I barely even notice it most of the time, which is why I've made a pledge never to both seeing anyhting in 3d ever again.
It doesn't work, adds nothing to the experiance (and is sometimes even jarring and detrimental), it's often only tacked on later as a gimick anyway and it costs more to see everything in 3d to boot. Fuck 3d.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-14-2012, 02:47 PM | #170 |
That's so PC of you
|
to be honest, the 3D on Thor was cool looking. It was only used a very few times, but when it was done, it was done well. It seems 3D works better on Native CGI effects then when applied to real footage.
|
|
|