| |
|
05-14-2012, 02:56 PM
|
#171 | ||
|
War Incarnate
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Nexus
Posts: 5,379
|
I saw Thor in 3d actually. I can't recall a single scene that stood out because of it, so it mustn't have been that good.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 03:54 PM
|
#172 |
|
Fight Me, Nerds
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,470
|
Clash of the Titans was pretty good in 3D, lots of big moving action scenes to show it off with.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 04:05 PM
|
#173 | |||
|
Objectively The Third Worst
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,591
|
Quote:
Quote:
I heard it was an irreparable pile of... stuff.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 04:10 PM
|
#174 |
|
Sent to the cornfield
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: K-space
Posts: 9,758
|
Cave of Forgotten Dreams is the only time I've seen 3D used appropriately
|
|
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 04:16 PM
|
#175 | |||
|
War Incarnate
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Nexus
Posts: 5,379
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 04:18 PM
|
#176 |
|
Fight Me, Nerds
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,470
|
it certainly was not the worst movie I have ever seen, by far.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 06:35 PM
|
#177 |
|
Archer and Armstrong vs. the World
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,164
|
If they can do Thor well, they can do Wonder Woman well (hell they could just steal the same plot structure, just reverse sexes for the characters of Thor, Odin, and Thor's gf, and have Paradise Island instead of Asgard). Actually I think I just wrote that movie in one sentence "Thor, but with Wonder Woman".
__________________
The Valiant Review |
|
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 06:46 PM
|
#178 |
|
That's so PC of you
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a Server-sided Dimension where time is meaningless
Posts: 10,490
|
yeah but you can't have a scene with Wonder woman being hit by a car driven by a man... cause that's sexist.
|
|
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 07:08 PM
|
#179 | |
|
Not a Taco
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,313
|
Quote:
__________________
I did a lot of posting on here as a teenager, and I was pretty awful. Even after I learned, grew up, and came to be on the right side of a lot of important issues, I was still angry, abrasive, and generally increased the amount of hate in the world, in pretty unacceptable ways. On the off chance that someone is taking a trip down memory lane looking through those old threads, I wanted to devote my signature to say directly to you, I'm sorry. Thank you for letting me be better, NPF. |
|
|
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 07:35 PM
|
#180 |
|
Please Be Well
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,715
|
The problem with all of these movies, as Azisien noted, is that they are all post-converted 3D. There is a difference between natively shot 3D footage, where two actual perspectives are recorded, giving objects a natural dimension, and post converted 3D, which basically boils down to mapping the image into layers which you then separate on a z-axis. Post-conversion can be inoffensive, but only when it's done very well. So far, I have not seen a post-converted 3D movie that has met that criteria. (Although I heard Deathly Hallows part 2 was alright--it's telling with regards to the backlash WB experienced after their rush-job of Clash of the Titans that they cancelled the post-conversion on part 1 because it wouldn't be up to snuff in time.)
But yeah, it's basically the fault of the large swath of inferior post-converted films that 3D is so often the middling affair that it is.
__________________
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
