Supernatural Mafia - Page 25

Roy_D_Mylote · 09-08-2006, 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Newb

Dear Newb: Using a person's every post in the thread is not an argument. Love Roy.

Dear DbS: Agreeing with someone who isn't making an argument, and saying they have an argument, is folly. Voting the same as that person is then bandwagoning. Love Roy.

Bailey · 09-08-2006, 06:25 AM

Alright, not so tired now.

When I'm tired I have a harder time explaining things well, and I figured that saying my argument would come later and then posting it later would be more effective in convincing people than posting a badly structured argument and trying to fix it later.

On day one, Cephrir doesn't actually ever really say anything. Oh, he has a bunch of posts, but go look at one. His reason for voting B_real is apparently that we can't lynch two people. Which we already know, and isn't really a reason.

He also rehashes things that other people say to look like he's saying something once or twice, and he attacked people for talking about the GO.

In short: He's not really contributing anything, just running around trying to throw votes at as many people as possible.

To me, this looks like Serial Killer behavior.

Or he could be a drunk townie, in which case we really don't need him tipping scales anyway.

Arhra · 09-08-2006, 07:51 AM

Actually Cephrir, I meant that being the third person to vote for someone who hasn't really done anytthing yet on the first day with spurious reasons that are a repeat of someone else's reasons looks quite bandwagony to me.

You also claim that bandwagoning is the only argument against you and is quite weak. I will summarise the current arguments:

-Everyone Cephrir has voted for has proven to be town alligned
-Voting for Fenris on the first day looked bandwagony
-As Newb's post listing shows, Cephrir generally seems to be just repeating other peoples' arguments for lynching.
-Cephrir seems very defensive
-His name starts with C, obviously displaying his cult allegience.

Now, all but one of these arguments are reasonable for suspicion, but aren't really enough to implicate someone on their own. Taken as a whole however, it does look much more suspicious.

Bailey · 09-08-2006, 08:00 AM

It was the fifth point that really convinced me though.

Death by Stabbing · 09-08-2006, 09:01 AM

Ok if Newb's mass ammounts of proof aren't good enough for you and my reasoning behind why I voted the same as someone else (which I notice you have done), Roy...how about the fact the he slams people for bandwagoning when he has done it himself (the fithth point that Newb mentioned is an example of this)...If people are looking for a scummy action, again, then I'd say that hypocracy is something we can all vote against.

Love,
DBS

Bailey · 09-08-2006, 09:11 AM

Uhhhhhh, I was talking about Arhra's fifth point, that Cephrir starts with C.

Did you mean the fifth post I linked, in which he unvotes Fenris and votes B_real?

Death by Stabbing · 09-08-2006, 09:19 AM

Yup that's the post I was talking about

Bailey · 09-08-2006, 09:53 AM

Okay, because you said point rather than post.

I was just a little thrown off there.

Major Blood · 09-08-2006, 11:49 AM

If any of you were wondering why i'm not posting, it's because i don't have anything to say. If i did, i would post.

That is all.

Bailey · 09-08-2006, 11:51 AM

MB, you have no idea how suspicious that sounds.

I'm just going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you were drunk when you joined the game and didn't actually want to play or something.

09-08-2006, 07:51 AM	#243
Arhra Ara ara! Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Neo Venezia Posts: 5,013	Actually Cephrir, I meant that being the third person to vote for someone who hasn't really done anytthing yet on the first day with spurious reasons that are a repeat of someone else's reasons looks quite bandwagony to me. You also claim that bandwagoning is the only argument against you and is quite weak. I will summarise the current arguments: -Everyone Cephrir has voted for has proven to be town alligned -Voting for Fenris on the first day looked bandwagony -As Newb's post listing shows, Cephrir generally seems to be just repeating other peoples' arguments for lynching. -Cephrir seems very defensive -His name starts with C, obviously displaying his cult allegience. Now, all but one of these arguments are reasonable for suspicion, but aren't really enough to implicate someone on their own. Taken as a whole however, it does look much more suspicious. __________________ This post is a good source of Ara ara, ufufu.* *These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This post is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.

09-08-2006, 11:49 AM	#249
Major Blood I'm out. Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: I'm not giving my location to a computer! Posts: 1,859	If any of you were wondering why i'm not posting, it's because i don't have anything to say. If i did, i would post. That is all. __________________ I'm outers folks. Mac can have my stuff.