Stargate SG1 Mafia - Page 37

Moogle0119 · 10-05-2006, 09:19 AM

Cephrir I'm sorry I ignored your comment but I was defending myself against Roy who voted for me because he had defended me (?) and I forgot to address your post earlier. While I'm not the most knowledgable when it comes to the SG1 series, if the ascended beings role makes sense for SK being scum then I agree with it as well. The reason I've been trying to go after IHMN for a while now is because of all of his posts are exactly like the one he posted above. He starts off with a vote against someone, who has already been voted for by others, and leaves a little quip at the end and never seems to address the fact that he's been voted against.

I understand that some people are just lurkers because thats their game style but this is a mafia game. I don't know why people would willingly sign up for this game and then refuse to participate at least somewhat frequently with posting who they think the town should lynch as well as defending themselves whenever they get votes against them. If that's someone's play style that's perfectly fine (they CAN do whatever they want) however it's not usually beneficial to the town to stay quiet and lurk for the entire game. This is my entire "I hate lurkers" thing that everyone keeps addressing. I don't even hate lurkers it's just that if you never post anything then there's no way to judge whether or not you're scummy and prevents us from being able to judge you. It's fine if that's your tactic and all, but if you start getting called out you should at least address it (in my opinion). To each his own though.

Anyway before I got off on that little tangent there, I still think and believe IHMN is particularily scummy for never once addressing the fact he's been voted against and every vote he's made has been a blatant bandwagon vote (as Mesden has pointed out in an earlier post). If there is sufficient evidence that we NEED to vote Silly Kitty then I'll change my vote to her then, but until then I'm keeping my vote on IHMN and keeping a watch on that lurker.

Karrrrrrrrrrrresche · 10-05-2006, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FenrisWolf

Actually, you died overnight.

...when?

Moogle0119 · 10-05-2006, 12:43 PM

grthwllms,

Post #338 on Page 34, quoted...

Quote:

Originally Posted by SithDarth

The next morning while everyone else was processing this new development a lone guard stumbled on the corpse of Grthwllms Lt Col Cameron Mitchell Mason: Tauri Aligned. Some one very angry had torn him apart. In fact some pieces looked to be missing as if they had been used to build something.

Now back to our regularly scheduled inquisition...

Karrrrrrrrrrrresche · 10-05-2006, 12:50 PM

Well CRAP! Good luck townies! And remember the Alamo.

Roy_D_Mylote · 10-05-2006, 04:49 PM

I'll vote with Moogle this time, and when that turns out to be wrong, we'll all know I'm right about being always wrong. Except then.

UNVOTE: MOOGLE and VOTE: IHMN

Cephrir · 10-05-2006, 07:04 PM

I almost just voted for IHMN, but I'm not going to. IHMN voted for SK in what could have been a bandwagon easily. I'm so sure that SK is scum that I don't think IHMN is. I am pretty sure, at least, that they're on opposing sides, or they at least don't know one another's roles. Vote stands. If one turns up town, though, we should lynch the other.

Also, Mesden, your list of living people is missing KP, secretskull, and yourself. (This is not meant as an accusation, so please don't anybody take it that way. I know it sorta sounds like one.)

Edit: And grthwllms is dead, too.

***Fenris*** · 10-05-2006, 07:05 PM

Sith, update the first post, please.

Mesden · 10-05-2006, 09:10 PM

Cephrir: These people are people we know are not scum. As in, I'm the Bodyguard, SecretSkull's alive and KP's...we're not touching his situation due to our limited knowledge.

I was displaying our choices for Lynch.

***Fenris*** · 10-05-2006, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mesden

Cephrir: These people are people we know are not scum. As in, I'm the Bodyguard, SecretSkull's alive and KP's...we're not touching his situation due to our limited knowledge.

I was displaying our choices for Lynch.

And I'm the PO, don't forget. I also appear to be immune to being killed at night.

Unfortunately, I've done some horrible POing this game.

Mesden · 10-05-2006, 09:12 PM

Yes, but I only mentioned the people he did. The reason you're off the list is self explanatory.

10-05-2006, 04:49 PM	#365
Roy_D_Mylote Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: The sky. Posts: 1,030	I'll vote with Moogle this time, and when that turns out to be wrong, we'll all know I'm right about being always wrong. Except then. UNVOTE: MOOGLE and VOTE: IHMN __________________ I hate roleclaims.

10-05-2006, 07:04 PM	#366
Cephrir With no _s! Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: In the wild. Posts: 24	I almost just voted for IHMN, but I'm not going to. IHMN voted for SK in what could have been a bandwagon easily. I'm so sure that SK is scum that I don't think IHMN is. I am pretty sure, at least, that they're on opposing sides, or they at least don't know one another's roles. Vote stands. If one turns up town, though, we should lynch the other. Also, Mesden, your list of living people is missing KP, secretskull, and yourself. (This is not meant as an accusation, so please don't anybody take it that way. I know it sorta sounds like one.) Edit: And grthwllms is dead, too. __________________ :rmage: See, anytime you do anything, the_e is a one in twenty chance that you will c_itically fail. Last edited by Cephrir; 10-05-2006 at 07:34 PM.

10-05-2006, 07:05 PM	#367
*Fenris* Administrator Join Date: May 2005 Location: East Coast Posts: 6,806	Sith, update the first post, please. __________________ "FENRIS IS AN ASSHOLE" - shiney

10-05-2006, 09:10 PM	#368
Mesden There is no Toph, only Melon Lord! Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Inside of a box inside of a smaller box Posts: 4,310	Cephrir: These people are people we know are not scum. As in, I'm the Bodyguard, SecretSkull's alive and KP's...we're not touching his situation due to our limited knowledge. I was displaying our choices for Lynch. __________________ I can tell you're lying.

10-05-2006, 09:12 PM	#370
Mesden There is no Toph, only Melon Lord! Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Inside of a box inside of a smaller box Posts: 4,310	Yes, but I only mentioned the people he did. The reason you're off the list is self explanatory. __________________ I can tell you're lying.

10-05-2006, 09:19 AM	#361
Moogle0119 The REAL Lord of the Dance Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Narshe Caves Posts: 397	Cephrir I'm sorry I ignored your comment but I was defending myself against Roy who voted for me because he had defended me (?) and I forgot to address your post earlier. While I'm not the most knowledgable when it comes to the SG1 series, if the ascended beings role makes sense for SK being scum then I agree with it as well. The reason I've been trying to go after IHMN for a while now is because of all of his posts are exactly like the one he posted above. He starts off with a vote against someone, who has already been voted for by others, and leaves a little quip at the end and never seems to address the fact that he's been voted against. I understand that some people are just lurkers because thats their game style but this is a mafia game. I don't know why people would willingly sign up for this game and then refuse to participate at least somewhat frequently with posting who they think the town should lynch as well as defending themselves whenever they get votes against them. If that's someone's play style that's perfectly fine (they CAN do whatever they want) however it's not usually beneficial to the town to stay quiet and lurk for the entire game. This is my entire "I hate lurkers" thing that everyone keeps addressing. I don't even hate lurkers it's just that if you never post anything then there's no way to judge whether or not you're scummy and prevents us from being able to judge you. It's fine if that's your tactic and all, but if you start getting called out you should at least address it (in my opinion). To each his own though. Anyway before I got off on that little tangent there, I still think and believe IHMN is particularily scummy for never once addressing the fact he's been voted against and every vote he's made has been a blatant bandwagon vote (as Mesden has pointed out in an earlier post). If there is sufficient evidence that we NEED to vote Silly Kitty then I'll change my vote to her then, but until then I'm keeping my vote on IHMN and keeping a watch on that lurker.