| |
|
12-27-2006, 01:18 AM
|
#11 | ||
|
We are Geth.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 14,032
|
Quote:
It was just too tempting to toss that reference to Snakes on a Plane in. Quote:
__________________
 |
||
|
|
12-27-2006, 01:19 AM
|
#12 |
|
The Straightest Shota
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: It's a secret to everybody.
Posts: 17,789
|
That's lame.
Totally looked like him, though, right? Or am I just going crazy?
__________________
|
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 01:33 AM
|
#13 |
|
Sent to the cornfield
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California
Posts: 568
|
New age wearwolfs? Now they need a new age frankstien......
|
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 02:33 AM
|
#14 | |
|
Argus Agony
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Gotta go fishing!
Posts: 10,483
|
Quote:
 I mean, I guess you could make a move about him, but I wouldn't be that interested... As for the movie in question: Out of everything, I was most displeased that they decided to just get a bunch of regular ol' wolves instead of making some damn werewolf-looking werewolves! These are monsters, not a bunch of guys that turn into doggies! I mean, yeah, a pack of wolves can rip you to shreds, but that's just standard wolf scary. Werewolves are a whole other matter, and should be treated as such. My point is that they should be a bunch of guys in crappy werewolf costumes running around in the woods for two hours.
__________________
Either you're dead or my watch has stopped. Last edited by POS Industries; 12-27-2006 at 02:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 02:36 AM
|
#15 | |
|
Sent to the cornfield
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: L.A. Sprawl
Posts: 589
|
Quote:
Seriously though, it's unfortunate, because I also would see it if it were Norton. I mean, does it get much sexier? Ever? Ed Norton as Neo-Nazi = Sexsplosion. About crappy movies in general though: I don't understand what Hollywood is thinking. They complain about poor revenue, then they release shitty movies, every last one of which is a fucking adaptation (and, let's be honest -- adaptations are hard to do right. So, really not the best kernel for a movie, generally). ... What's so mystifying about the loss of revenue, again? I mean, really, you're telling me that thousands of people who do nothing but try to gauge the average American's likes and dislikes and fantasies can't figure out that crappy movies won't make as much money? Really? No, I guess it couldn't be the low quality of their products -- it has to be piracy. Damn those internets! And those hoodlum youths! Why must they always raise hell in such a rowdy, and/or unorthodox manner? Harumph, I say! Last edited by Tydeus; 12-27-2006 at 02:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 03:57 AM
|
#16 |
|
We are Geth.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 14,032
|
You just answered your own question, Tyde.
EDIT: Yeah, it did look like him second time I watched the trailer.
__________________
|
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 10:28 AM
|
#17 | |
|
That's so PC of you
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a Server-sided Dimension where time is meaningless
Posts: 10,490
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 06:52 PM
|
#18 | |
|
Argus Agony
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Gotta go fishing!
Posts: 10,483
|
Quote:
__________________
Either you're dead or my watch has stopped. |
|
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 07:52 PM
|
#19 | |
|
I do the numbers.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 5,260
|
You know that guy that said, "Hey, we should name the Revolution the Wii."
I think we just found his new job. I think we need more titles like "Snakes on a Plane." We need titles that are a synopsis of the movie. "Blood and Chocolate." What does that tell you? Nothing. It should more properly be named "Conflicted Werewolf" Or even better "Conflicted Werewolf in heat."
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 08:46 PM
|
#20 | |
|
for all seasons
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,409
|
Quote:
I mean why on earth would they go and make a shitty werewolf movie, and leave out any of the actual reasons anyone would ever go and see a shitty werewolf movie?
__________________
check out my buttspresso
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
