11-26-2012, 03:25 PM | #10 | ||||
Erotic Esquire
|
In this topic: historical revisionists
I wasn't the slightest bit snarky when I was made the original post you all responded to, which merely elucidated that Crusader Kings II (a game I like, by the way, and one I'm usually more eager to defend) is saddled with a fair share of issues related to social justice concerns that might caution against its purchase.
Y'all then proceeded to react with: Quote:
Quote:
Instead, y'all proceeded to attempt to prove me wrong and/or lecture me, with a continued flippant tone: Quote:
Quote:
Yes, I'm sure I "did my homework" on that one. And yes, by the time we had gotten that far -- by the time I had already elucidated in three separate posts my line of reasoning -- I finally gave in to temptation and decided to inject some snark because you were already tossing out your zingers at me for daring to suggest that a game I actually LIKE has genuine issues. And no, I shouldn't have to justify every attempt I make to preface recommendations for videogames with a social-justice related disclaimer. This is the kind of attitude and behavior that makes talking about issues like sexism and homophobia utterly impossible here at NPF.
__________________
WARNING: Snek's all up in this thread. Be prepared to read massive walls of text. |
||||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|