Mafia: NPF edition

[dojindog]

While B_real came up with a good defense I think I should still rebuttal

Originally Posted by h4x.m4g3

He accuses Roy of being suspicious because he's just tagging along, when all he really did for the rest of the thread was follow Mes around with her arguement with Sith. (While I don't think either of you are mafia yet, just players with opposing viewpoints. I must say it was a nice way to gather information on other players.).

I accused Roy of being suspicious because he was stating the same facts just after they were alread mentioned which is slightly spammy (in my eyes) and yes I tail'd Mesden around for a while I know I shouldn't do that but Mesden's ideas seemed really easy to follow at 1:00 in the morning.

Originally Posted by h4x.m4g3

So presenting evidence and re-itterating facts is bad? Am I just reading this wrong? Isn't that what a lawyer (And in this game everyone is a prosecution and a defense lawyer) does? Restate evidence that supports their veiw while denouncing their opponent's evidence? How does evidence make things confusing?

Evidence doesn't make things confusing but hithishiishianisexamplehi sure as heck is (in my opinion) this is what Roy was doing except not on near as annoying scale. (if you can't read that try taking out the hi's)

Originally Posted by h4x.m4g3

I don't see this whole vote quickly or the mafia's gonna get you thing. Perhaps I'm just leaning more on Sith's thought style but you don't need to vote just to vote. You need to vote when there is a reson to vote.

I said earlier that I didn't mean for you not to put any thought into your vote. What I'm trying to get across here is vote when you first feel like it is right to vote.

Originally Posted by h4x.m4g3

Why do you hate to take sides with Mesden. Personal vendetta, fear she's scummy? Also Mesden was doing the same thing as Sith here, wording her phrases so she appeared good and Sith bad. It seems Mes just did a better job convincing him.

B_real was right on target with her assumption on why I hate to side with Mesden and, as I said earlier I sided with Mes because at 1:00 in the morning her ideals were easy to follow I know it's a really bad defense and I hate to use it but it's the truth.

Originally Posted by h4x.m4g3

To clarify, I don't see how deducing and reasoning over time can be bad. Does that mean I think we should wait forever, no.

This is exactly what I'm trying to say!

Originally Posted by h4x.m4g3

This line of thinking is completely wrong. Innocent men are sent to prison because they look guilty, because people want them to be guilty, etc. If someone (lets say a police officer) was threatening your life (death penalty, as in this game) because he thought you did something, even if you knew you didn't. You would get frustrated, upset, and fearful. After all you're an INNOCENT man going to be put to DEATH for someone elses crime, and there is nothing you can do to stop it.

I could understand that point of view if he was actually being voted for on our words (Mesden's really) but I wouldn't be worried about an authority figure trying to throw me in jail if he had no evidence (people voting for me).

Rebuttal'd enough for you?