Quote:
Originally Posted by Nique
Good vote. Desisive, simple. I like that.
I'm torn between Psycho and Mestizio. And then I have the sneaking suspician that the mafia is barely involved at all, and we're just killing ourselves... But what else can we do?
Psycho and Mest. are my two primary suspects, but if mest. holds her psycho vote, that means that they can't both be mafia. Mestizio shows consistent behavior in voting (once agreeing with PM, and then with me) whereas psycho mantis has not becuase 1)he's innocent or 2)the mafia's strategy had to change to give my previous arguments less credibility.
I think I'm giving psycho too much credit - I don't know that he would think as far ahead as I was suggesting. Mestizio, however, has supported two lynchings heavily, and one innocent lyching of those two, but has remained out of the spotlight, as it were. I think what happened was once I started pointing fingers, she supported me to kind of stroke my ego, and give me the confidence to continue my accusation of PM. Her agreement gave others confidence in my arguments, and before you know it I'm at the head of a well-developed mafia scheme. Its perfect - they go unnoticed as mere 'support' and then all the other towksfolk and mafia jump on the lynch bandwagon to kill an innocent. It's another assumption based theory, but I think this would be a good way to do things if I was in the mafia.
|
But at this point are you giving me to much credit. People are lynched because they have the most evidence put against them. At the beginning PM seemed the most likely, but had a very good rebuttal. And with that rebuttal he seemed to convince half the forum. And now I'm back on PM because it seems he is most likely. So now your putting the spotlight on me for agreeing with the best arguments? I guess I does seem a little scummy at first to be in agreement with both lynchings, but it's not like I hopped on the band wagon just to get rid of someone. I was just the second supporter in both cases because I brought further circumstantial evidence after the main points had been made. The mafia obviously want townspeople gone, but every else wants the mafia gone. In a situation like this it would seem obvious that the first person to start an accusation has the highest chance of being mafia. In this case it was PM and I. Even though I haven't started any accusations yet I have supported the most plausible opinoins. One of which has been wrong. But the same apllies to 9 other people. I'm a very logical person and if it's the most logical answer, I go for it.(did that sound a little mafia-esque? Ohwell.)
And now PM comes with a good rebuttal to his problem like he did last time on Newb. But now I have Nique on my ass and he seems to be running townspeople induced things. I go with the info other people have given me that seems to work. Earlier PM seemed the worst possible person and then Newb and now I am kinda like Newb. Except for the fact that PM didn't target me. Nique did bacause PM, once again came through with a good reason and unvoted somebody. Pm is thinking the right way for a townie at this point so I'm giving him some slack. Even if it means I'm going.
Unvote:Psycho Mantis