The Big Big Thread of Religious Discussion

[Archbio]

Inconsistent observations! The idea has been part of my "necessary assumption" since the first time I wrote it. Go ahead, look it up.

I'm pretty sure I took the exact wording from one of your posts.

Of course, Sithdarth would say that we would measure it and find that it's inconsistent, but no dice there. You look at something, see that it appears wrong (one meter where the should be eight, for instance), then you measure. Except when you measure it, it looks to you as if it is one meter. With this idea, observations only have to make sense when you can objectively prove that they don't. No need to even bamboozle the machines!

No, Sithdarth would be right.

Because then there is no distinction between krylo's confusing tangent and what I've been saying the whole time. Go ahead and replace "reality" with "everything which we can sense" in that context.

I don't think that's a good reason. It would be a good reason for me to bow out of this tangent, however, because I'm not really able to local the exact disagreement anymore and Krylo's not the one confusing me.