Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrel-Hating Sycophant
Well there are two options really:
Firstly we can lynch someone. This is generally a statisically good strategy and is one of the best way for townies to hit mafia (someone can run the statistics on our numbers if they want).
There is an exception however. If we are going to get clues from killings (which I feel we just might) it pays to not lynch anyone to keep the game going as long as possible to get clues.
I'll wait to see what others say but I think if we wait and see who talks and who doesn't it generally makes for a more fun game if we get rid of the quiet ones. Trying to fly under the radar, pah!
Now that I think about it that statement from LHN is pretty suspicious! Is he new at this or has he played before? I also throw in a POS: LHN
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrel-Hating Sycophant
Vote: LHN
Bookworm is referring to LHN"s first comment that we discussed on the first page. We have no other real criteria yet so we might as well use anything we have rather than taking random shots.
|
actually I'm thinking about this vote more, at first you just gave him a pinky of suspicion yet suddenly after he gets a vote on him you put a second vote on him. Why the change so quickly when no new information had been pointed out? Seems to me you were just waiting for someone else to place a vote before you put one on.
Vote:Barrel-Hating Sycophant until you can give me a good reason you switched from a pinky of suspicion to a vote.
edit: added the first post i am talking about