02-10-2009, 02:22 PM | #11 | |
Napoleon Impersonator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 816
|
I'm not sure where we're supposed to find the sympathy here. Honestly. Surely even the people who are losing this money don't actually think this way. Surely?
I read that article, and I just could not find myself thinking that it was anything other than a satire. Surely it was a sarcastic editorial! No, no, it's entirely serious. All I have to say is, what. the. fuck. If that's how our upper class view the world, maybe our country really is doomed to follow Rome's example. Edit: Quote:
The thing is, I don't think the quality of the teacher should matter at the college level. If a student really wants to learn the subject, they can do so despite a terrible teacher. I did in high school, many times over, and I'm not superhuman by any means. That's not to say that a good teacher is not an advantage; merely that I don't see a bad teacher as much of a hindrance to a good student. And to keep this a bit more on-topic, I don't think that education at certain places should cost the ridiculous premiums it does currently. A good student from a state institution is perfectly capable of performing on the same level as a good student in a private institution. It's like paying $200 for Diesel brand jeans. Ridiculous. The difference between state and private comes when you look at the average students... The people who aren't particularly motivated to learn anyway. They are the ones who pick up more in private schools versus state schools. I see that as a parenting problem more than a problem with state schools; in other words, I think parents should work harder to make their kids better students. Last edited by Marelo; 02-10-2009 at 02:35 PM. |
|
|
|