Mafia: Basic

[Mesden]

Originally Posted by Silly Kitty

Okay, I have just skimmed through this thing so far. Maple Story is taking up too much of my life, sorry.

Mes, I noticed you got on to B_Real about his voting early but did you get on to anyone else like you did him? If you have, I am sorry. I promise to read this whole thing tonight.

No, since their reasons were the same as his and applied to others as well.

Plus, Catlover is just being inane in my eyes and either B_Real already stated the reason or copied it.

So, since B_Real is leading the charge, I address him first and foremost.

EDIT: To include SK's quote due to Fenris's request. Sorry, I just answer fast and don't bother to quote.

[Fenris]

Originally Posted by Mesden

No, since their reasons were the same as his and applied to others as well.

Who are you talking to? This is merely a request to everybody, but would you try to quote who you're talking to to avoid any confusion?

EDIT: To thank Mesden for acknowledging my request.

[P-Sleazy]

well, this is good, all these people, being very suspicious of me but not quite ready to vote for me. It seems to me that either you're all in cahoots with eachother (all mafiates) or youre extremely weary townies. theres seems to be 5 of you, Mesden, Silly Kitty, CmP, Ogianres, and Sithdarth, who are suspicious. But none of you voted. Seems to me like youre trying to start up a bandwagon vote but dont want to be the one who throws the first stone to get it rolling.

Theres also more than one way to guage peoples reactions. Think on that for a while.

[Silly Kitty]

B_Real, how am I suspicious? What have I done?

Originally Posted by b_real

well, this is good, all these people, being very suspicious of me but not quite ready to vote for me.

I haven't mentioned you once.

[CallmePrismatic]

B_Real, how am I suspicious? What have I done?

I haven't mentioned you once.

Mes, I noticed you got on to B_Real about his voting early but did you get on to anyone else like you did him? If you have, I am sorry. I promise to read this whole thing tonight.

You mentioned his name, so he apparently took that as an accusation or something.

b_real, I think you just overplayed your hand. Of the five people you listed, the ones that knowingly 'accused' you I mean, the general tone was asking you to explain your actions.

But now you think we've backed you into a corner, even though the majority of us were lounging around on the sofa while you sat under the endtable and threw packing peanuts at us. When one of us mentions that the peanut-throwing was a bit odd you suddenly freak out, run to the corner, and start babbling that we're to blame. That is not how an innocent person handles confrontation.

Vote: B_real_shadows. I've made my case, but like I've said, I can be swayed if you change your mentality from gibbering to reasonable.

[P-Sleazy]

honestly CmP, did you even give that last statement of mine in my previous post some thought?

Originally Posted by Me

Theres also more than one way to guage peoples reactions. Think on that for a while.

It may enlighten you to a new perspective of playing this game.

As for Silly Kitty, I took her post as a way of saying she agrees with Mesden.

[Silly Kitty]

No, that was a post to question Mes. You know, because I was asking her a question. The question has nothing more to do with you than saying her argument started with you.

[P-Sleazy]

Ok, then, I remove Silly Kitty from that list, so that makes 4. And CmP, youre off since a mafiate isnt likely (if at all) to take the first vote on someone in a case like this. So now its 3. Mesden, Ogianres, and SithDarth.

[Sithdarth]

Ok, then, I remove Silly Kitty from that list, so that makes 4. And CmP, youre off since a mafiate isnt likely (if at all) to take the first vote on someone in a case like this. So now its 3. Mesden, Ogianres, and SithDarth.

That is unless of course in knowing that you know that he voted to throw you off. But then if he knew you knew that he would attempt to trick you by making the first vote then he wouldn't ect. This type of reasoning never leads anywhere at all. It is completely counter productive and great for causing delay.

Now that being said if this was some crazy Mafiate plot you placed two of the strongest players in it. (One just generally considered strong and the other a very good Mafiate.) Now with either of the two in the group something that seems such common knowledge as "Mafiates don't first vote bandwagons" would be well known by both. Thus, they would advise their fellows not to do that as it would raise suspicion.

Also, I'm not sure exactly where you got this "mafiates never vote first in a bandwagon". Of course if you were a Mafiate you might say that to throw us off your trail. Get enough people believing that and you look innocent because you had the stones to vote. That right there is a pretty decent reason for that to come out of nowhere. That's not to say you shouldn't be wary of me but picking apart your crazy logic I can't make sense of is hardly a reason to place me in a mafiate conspirecy.

[Silly Kitty]

Lists can be dangerous. In Sol Mafia Newb made a list of people he thought were mafia and gave it to the town. He in fact gave a list of one known mafia and a bunch of townies including the vig. By giving a list of people you find suspicious as to be mafia, you could be giving the mafia a list of people to hit.