My Little Pony: Friendship is Mafia

[rpgdemon]

Originally Posted by Sifright

I also feel the need to point out the difference between voting 100% inactives off who aren't doing anything on the ENTIRE forum and inactives who are active else where on the forum it's quite a large difference.

Yes, it is. One of them was a plan that I didn't support except as a last resort, because it was tantamount to not voting at all. The other was a plan that someone else (Snake?) brought up, and it seemed logical, and I did support it, since we had no other leads, and this wasn't a lead of, "HE'S INACTIVE", so much as, "HE'S DOING SOMETHING AT NIGHT AND LURKING AT DAY."

[rpgdemon]

I'm going to class.

[Sifright]

Originally Posted by rpgdemon

Again, you're aiming to lie and mislead. What was the point of posting Fenris's post? Are you implying that I'm clairvoyant, and should have known that Fenris would have told us, after I posted, that he hadn't replaced inactives yet? What is your angle? If you're town, and you think I'm scum, you're playing absolutely terribly. You don't try to twist facts to make them fit what you want, you base what you want off of facts. I legitimately can't believe you when you say that you're not scum, and every time you try to leverage "Backup", you just make it more obvious.

Who are you even backing up to? People all start bandwagonning on me, and you go, "Okay, well, there's as much can be said about me or him being scummy as can be said! We need to follow other leads!", without addressing the huge list of points that I made against you at all. Then when people start voting off of me, you decide that logic isn't a good way to play this game, and to start putting your spin on what happened.

I was going based off the idea that Fawful had acted at night, and still hadn't said a single thing in the thread, making him highly suspicious. And it seemed as if Fenris had replaced people for inactivity, so the fact that Fawful was still around was suspicious. Fenris posted later saying that Fawful wasn't necessarily active, and then Aldurin happened.

What huge list of points so far your only going to lynch me because "LOL HE SAID KARESH IS FLUTTER SHY DAY 1 AND HES MAFIA BECAUSE HE KEEPS TRYING TO COME UP WITH PLANS THAT COULD ONLY WORK WELL FOR HIM IF HE IS TOWN HUURP." I mean yea my plan day one had the chance to back fire day one if the doctor or PO was lynched but we would be told that and people could then react to said information.

Also I note your saying i'm lying in your post but I didn't lie I directly quoted your actions. I posted the fenris thing to show that lynching people who are completely inactive IE Julford now would be a stupid thing to do and because that proved that going for inactives was a terrible idea.

[Verifiedz]

Originally Posted by Fenris

Vote count!

Nikose 1
Sifright

Sifright 2
rpgdemon
Hawk

rpgdemon 2
Ryanderman
Bard

greed 2
Aldurin
Revolving Ocelot

If you voted and it wasn't counted, it's because you suck at formatting.

Deadline sometime, however many I said last time to lynch!

VOTE:NIKOSE I said that earlier didn't you get it?

[Sifright]

Verifiedz you need to move the vote:nikose to a seperate line

[Verifiedz]

Oh.
UNVOTE:NIKOSE

VOTE:Rpgdemon

[Sifright]

Also RPGdemon is only trying counter a single point in my entire post and then goes look at sifright go kill him for that one point.

[rpgdemon]

Originally Posted by Sifright

Also RPGdemon is only trying counter a single point in my entire post and then goes look at sifright go kill him for that one point.

Yes, because the simple point, and many other of your simple points, have been outright lies trying to get people to vote against me. There's no way that's helpful behavior.

[Sifright]

please go ahead and quote said lies.

[rpgdemon]

Originally Posted by Sifright

Also I note your saying i'm lying in your post but I didn't lie I directly quoted your actions. I posted the fenris thing to show that lynching people who are completely inactive IE Julford now would be a stupid thing to do and because that proved that going for inactives was a terrible idea.

That was an implied lie though, right there. Posting Fenris's thing made no sense, as it wasn't information available when the plan was discussed, and not even initiated by me! And heck, you're even lying by saying it's a player who's completely inactive. There was evidence that Julford was acting at night, and not during the day, and wasn't replaced by Fenris. It was a strong case to be suspicious. Posting the Fenris thing ignores the circumstance and is meant to mislead, as it's completely a red herring. There is NO reason to post it, as it's got no relevance to what was discussed before he mentioned it.

Originally Posted by Sifright

I'm going to ignore this post for now and will write up a concise rebuttal later but I'd like to show every one a plan I have for really hammering the Mafia, if the PO has certain information.

You lied here: You just ignored that post, as you ignore all criticism of yourself, and somehow everyone buys it. You never rebutted Hawk's points. You just went, "LOLOLOL SUICIDE HAH YOU WON'T VOTE FOR ME NOW."

Originally Posted by Sifright

Justification of killing inactives.

Edit: Note Smb was in favour of this tactic and he was scum

A direct and blatant lie about me. I was arguing against SMB, and it's incredibly obvious because he was the next person to respond saying how I was wrong. I already made this point though, which was again ignored by you, because hey, why do we need logic? That keeps us from lynching townies.

Just start reading here to see what I said about it.

http://www.nuklearforums.com/showthr...=40768&page=92

Right there, when there's clear suspicion on you, you just ignore it.

Now, I'm going to leave. I'm not going to check this thread again, until I have my paper written. It may not be until night fall. I may break this promise, but I need to get this paper written, and you're wasting my time.