06-09-2004, 02:30 PM | #11 | |
The revolution will be memed!
|
Quote:
__________________
D is for Dirty Commie! |
|
06-09-2004, 03:02 PM | #12 |
Air Pirate
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ivalice
Posts: 16
|
hmm, same here. It depends how well its implemented, and whether or not it can be shown to have any impact on internet crime.
__________________
Would you dance with the Devil or fly with Angels? |
06-10-2004, 09:30 AM | #13 |
The Dread Pirate
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Where the wild things are
Posts: 1,310
|
I have a question that is vaguely on topic:
Say a cyber-cop tries to catch a pedophile. If he pretends to be a underage girl, sets up a meeting and entices the criminal to come, isn't that entrapment? Or am I wrong...
__________________
Man, n. An animal so lost in rapturous contemplation of what he thinks he is as to overlook what he indubitably ought to be. His chief occupation is the extermination of other animals and his own species, which, however, multiplies with such insistent rapidity as to infest the whole habitable earth and Canada. -Ambrose Bierce's Devil's Dictionary |
06-10-2004, 09:57 AM | #14 |
Ninja Death God
|
i believe that could be considered entrapment, and because of that, its not how its done. cops have been catching people like in private meetings set up in chat rooms for years. they've been posing as prostitutes to catch guys for decades. they know how to not entrap the would be criminal.
__________________
"Falsehood is worse than hate, and that must be; if she whom I love, should ever love me" |
06-10-2004, 12:14 PM | #15 | |
You -got- my postcard?!
|
Quote:
If the officers merely provide circumstances that would -allow- the person to commit a crime, it is not entrapment. If the person actually makes the effort to meet the agent, then it cannot be considered entrapment because the person obviously was not baited to do something against their will. Here; I'm not good at summaries. Here's a better definition. Last edited by Croteam6; 06-10-2004 at 12:17 PM. |
|
06-10-2004, 12:34 PM | #16 |
wishes he was bob dylan
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 85
|
under what law would it be done because remember as we all know thanks to that absolutely shit film of zeta-jones and connery entrapment is perfectly ok in the uk
__________________
theres beauty in everything its up to you to look hard enough cellar door |
06-10-2004, 12:39 PM | #17 |
The revolution will be memed!
|
Its ok here atleast.
__________________
D is for Dirty Commie! |
06-11-2004, 12:21 AM | #18 |
Lakitu
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,152
|
Monitor this *gives the government the digital finger* ok I just needed to get that out of my system
for the thing about entrapment, I believe in order to catch the suspect lawfully, the pedaphile would have to be the one to suggest meeting somplace i.e. the cop can't say "Wanna come over and have some fun ; )" . I think monitoring for Pedaphiles and the like is a good ideal, don't get me wrong, but I just don't like the ideal of being watched...hehehe....no I haven't done anything wrong...or planned to... yet |
06-11-2004, 10:34 AM | #19 |
Troopa
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 53
|
Children need to be protected from predators, few would argue that. But there is quite a bit of hysteria over child abuse that is enabling the government(s) to do things we wouldn't stand for otherwise and we may regret later. The same is true of terrorism. I think the government (US anyway) already monitors chat rooms, message boards, and sites at will. The "Wild West" days of the internet are ending.
I also hate the assumption that only people with something to hide are against it. |
06-11-2004, 10:47 AM | #20 | |
The revolution will be memed!
|
Quote:
__________________
D is for Dirty Commie! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|