07-05-2010, 11:58 PM | #271 |
Boo Buddy
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 400
|
According to Shamallama, "Ong" is correct. Something tells me he's wrong. He does, however, have this weird ability to make his bullshit appear to be logical, at first glance.
__________________
Great site, especially for RPers: http://degosroleplaying.aceboard.com/ (As you can see, the key to advertisement is subtlety.) |
07-06-2010, 12:06 AM | #272 |
So we are clear
|
could reason that it was the original intended pronounciation, but when the creators ok the pronounciation of the only audio version of a work, then it should be considered the official and proper one. Unless they have since said otherwise, the original stands
__________________
"don't hate me for being a heterosexual white guy disparaging slacktivism, hate me for all those murders I've done." |
07-06-2010, 12:22 AM | #273 |
LP maker
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 130
|
Well from what I heard a linguist said to to say "Ong" because it'd be easier. Or to summarize we're stupid make it easier to pronounce.
__________________
Welcome to my insanity! http://www.nuklearforums.com/showthread.php?t=38278 |
07-06-2010, 12:28 AM | #274 |
Stop the hate
|
|
07-06-2010, 04:05 AM | #275 |
Boo Buddy
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 400
|
Yeah, I figured if the pronunciation was wrong, the show would have all sorts of pissed off Weeaboos bitching about it. To quote myself, because I'm just the kind of narcissistic asshole who would do that, "No, Shamallama, being Asian does not make you an expert."
I'm not shitting you. He actually said he knew "because he's Asian."
__________________
Great site, especially for RPers: http://degosroleplaying.aceboard.com/ (As you can see, the key to advertisement is subtlety.) |
07-06-2010, 04:49 AM | #276 | |
Fight Me, Nerds
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,470
|
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Marc v4.0; 07-06-2010 at 04:52 AM. |
|
07-06-2010, 05:58 AM | #277 |
Wat
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Amongst the dead
Posts: 2,716
|
But that's just it.
I didn't expect much at all. It was a genuinely bad movie. Its redeeming qualities were effects and sets. The dialogue was average, the acting was poor, and the characters were barely past empty-shell status. I don't see what there is to enjoy, and that's without comparisons to the series. Like... you're entitled to your opinion and all but my expectations were in no way inflated. |
07-06-2010, 09:43 AM | #278 |
Sent to the cornfield
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,566
|
It should have been watchable to someone who didn't know what an Avatar was. It should have been a standalone product, interesting enough to attract an audience, not some derivative nonsense only interested in milking a pre-established audience.
Take an example of another bad movie, X-Men. Yeah, it was pretty craptastic, but at the same time it had the balls to move in its own direction. If you didn't know what an X-Man was you'd still be able to watch the movie and be all like "damn this needs more Wolverine." When you watch Avatar as a subject matter neophyte, it just leaves you bewildered and upset. It doesn't have a lot of internal consistency, its just visual cliffs notes of a supposedly great source material. That's a terrible way to write a movie. |
07-06-2010, 09:56 AM | #279 | |
Trash Goblin
|
Quote:
|
|
07-06-2010, 10:47 AM | #280 | |
Speed-Suit
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bronies are the new Steampunk
Posts: 2,129
|
It's made 70.5 fucking million dollars.
I hate you.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|