Mafia: NPF edition

[Demonlink2]

Originally Posted by Our holy leader in space

that game has nothing to do with THIS one.

Yeah, but Garud said

Originally Posted by The GO

5. All of the players spend the remaining days discussing whom they think is in the Mafia. They can judge this based on who was killed last, how suspicious their opponents sound, or anything else they want to use as evidence.

Bolded and Italicized for emphasis.

[TheSpacePope]

I know that you can use that as evidence. I am just questioning the validity of the claim. There is no real reason to do that especially when catlover has not made post 2 I believe. And thank you O master mage, that post gave me a better idea on the methedology. I am still waiting for catlover's response.

[P-Sleazy]

Originally Posted by Sithdarth

Yes because we all know that since one person guessed right at some point then all people that have every guessed after that point must have a higher chance of being right. Wait a second...

I never said I was right. I'm just fairly sure of it. And this isn't exactly a guess or a shot in the dark like IC's was in the first mafia. This is somewhat more of an educated guess.

[h4x.m4g3]

B_Reall, I believe your theorem has one fatal flaw in it. Catlover isn't here.

Unless Catlover left explicit instructions to the other mafiettes on who to kill next, then the fact that Silly Kitty died last night should have no bearing on wether or not Catlover is mafia. And even if explicit instructions were left, can we trust that the mafia followed them, unless they were trying to cast supicion upon Catlover and hoping that a townie would take up your point of reasoning.

Ughh this circular reasoning and double logic is making my head hurt. The point is I find your theory illogical.

And just for the record Twiddy and CMP were the other two mafia-members in the last game. They coughed up when the game was in its death throws.

[P-Sleazy]

Originally Posted by h4x.m4g3

B_Reall, I believe your theorem has one fatal flaw in it. Catlover isn't here.

Unless Catlover left explicit instructions to the other mafiettes on who to kill next, then the fact that Silly Kitty died last night should have no bearing on wether or not Catlover is mafia. And even if explicit instructions were left, can we trust that the mafia followed them, unless they were trying to cast supicion upon Catlover and hoping that a townie would take up your point of reasoning.

Ughh this circular reasoning and double logic is making my head hurt. The point is I find your theory illogical.

And just for the record Twiddy and CMP were the other two mafia-members in the last game. They coughed up when the game was in its death throws.

Here he is. Post number 255.

you were saying?

EDIT: oh and to that last part, Fenris already told us that.

[Fenris]

Originally Posted by B_real_shadows

Here he is. Post number 255.

you were saying?

And we haven't seen any action from him since.

You were saying?

[P-Sleazy]

oh I know. I just wanted to show that he did atleast have SOME activity in this thread. Remarkably in time to see the end of the day and get that night role in.

[Fenris]

Originally Posted by B_real_shadows

oh I know. I just wanted to show that he did atleast have SOME activity in this thread. Remarkably in time to see the end of the day and get that night role in.

Not... really...

He posted the day he got internet access back, to check to see if he was still in it. We finished attempting to lynch dojindog that same day. He got back in time for the lynching. It's not like he was hiding on the computer going, "They're about to lynch that guy, I'll pop in to see if anyone notices."

I mean, come on, he had no internet, and I don't see a motivation to lie about it. The night ended on the 29th, yesterday.

Really, it's just him getting back before the day was up. Can't try to kill somebody for coming in the door a bit late.

WAY LONG BACK NINJA'D EDIT:

Originally Posted by B_real

Still doesn't change the fact that he was Mafia does it?

No, but it also doesn't change the fact that you don't have all of your facts straight.

[P-Sleazy]

Originally Posted by FenrisWolf

Not... really...

He posted the day he got internet access back, to check to see if he was still in it. We finished attempting to lynch dojindog that same day. He got back in time for the lynching. It's not like he was hiding on the computer going, "They're about to lynch that guy, I'll pop in to see if anyone notices."

I mean, come on, he had no internet, and I don't see a motivation to lie about it. The night ended on the 29th, yesterday.

Really, it's just him getting back before the day was up. Can't try to kill somebody for coming in the door a bit late.

But it started on the 28th. and AGAIN, we don't know if the Mafia were the last ones who sent in their role.

EDIT: Also, we know not whether he is lying or not in the PUBLIC Announcement Thread. Could be a ploy to keep suspicion off him.

[Fenris]

Originally Posted by B_real_shadows

But it started on the 28th. and AGAIN, we don't know if the Mafia were the last ones who sent in their role.

So stop assuming some such, also I did edit my post above you to target another one of your edits.

Honestly, I bet you never thought you'd face this much opposition from me, did you? I'm the one who's in trouble if you're right, so why would I oppose you?

Because I think you're wrong. You claim it's a long shot, but you also claim to be "almost 100% sure of it being true", as Thundergod Cid pointed out.

And trying to blame it on Mesden earlier, which you never really answered why, makes you look incredibly scummy. Claiming you got caught in a trap that was hers, (but really isn't, it's just your idea that backfired) isn't an answer. Answer all of the post, not just the parts that are convenient.

EDIT:

Originally Posted by B_real

EDIT: Also, we know not whether he is lying or not in the PUBLIC Announcement Thread. Could be a ploy to keep suspicion off him.

Bullshit. I sincerely doubt he would lie in front of the entire forums just to lie here. If he was going to lie here, he would.