New theory to revolutionize quantum physics.

[Aldurin]

Fine, it's not a theory. It's a theoretical concept.

Sorry about not putting out evidence. I'm just throwing myself headfirst into a new direction of thought. I still think it is possible to discover new things beyond what our biological design allows us to perceive. I don't have much to start with except an idea, the proverbial apple that hits my head.

Kinda cool that Scientific American did a small article on this idea before. So it won't revolutionize quantum physics at any foreseeable point in the future.

Originally Posted by Geminex

Hey, Earl, d'you write poetry?

No, I would never get bored enough to do that.

I guess why I'm thinking miles outside of the box is my habit with watching the Stargate series. Small leaps in quantum physics seem so normal to me that something as incomprehensible as this theory is essentially a challenge to myself.

I'll start thinking out some logic (and maybe evidence) about this. And I'll rename the thread to something not as unintentionally arrogant.

[Seil]

No, I would never get bored enough to do that.

Poetry is boring? Boring? Boy, you and I need to have words.

I guess why I'm thinking miles outside of the box is my habit with watching the Stargate series. Small leaps in quantum physics seem so normal to me that something as incomprehensible as this theory is essentially a challenge to myself.

Maybe you should make a second account, because just one doesn't really seem like it can contain both you and your ego.

[McTahr]

My issue wasn't with the concept itself. Time's a big thing getting hammered out in the Physics world, in various ways, and new presentations of an aspect of our world we consider old hat aren't automatically bad. It's when they're presented in a manner that doesn't involve science or scientific rigor in the least that it becomes irksome.

I mean, there are teams that even found a distant possibility in their experiments that future events can influence the present/past. Of course, this was through a series of studies, and I never followed up to see if other teams confirmed or denied their results, but it still says a lot about the open-mindedness regarding time when things are specifically handled in a scientific manner.

It's to be said, quite fairly, that humans know jack about time for certain. Even these physicists recently debating these topics, and during the relativity era those considering the thought-children that would become superstring/etc. are met with disdain if they can't at least reasonably present explanations of phenomena, repeatable data, etc.

[Magic_Marker]

Originally Posted by EvilEarl

I guess why I'm thinking miles outside of the box is my habit with watching the Stargate series. Small leaps in quantum physics seem so normal to me that something as incomprehensible as this theory is essentially a challenge to myself.

I'll start thinking out some logic (and maybe evidence) about this. And I'll rename the thread to something not as unintentionally arrogant.

Bwah? You attribute your genius to watching Stargate? Look I like the show but this:



Isn't real. Or at least it doesn't work. The show is really, really bad science. If that is where you are being informed on how the universe works then...

Well you were lied to.

[Osterbaum]

Yeah Stargate is Sci-fi fantasy with a lot of soft science and several miracle exceptions. On another note, a lego Stargate? I wantttttttt!

[Professor Smarmiarty]

To be honest, the time depedent Schrodinger is a piece of shit, time indepedence allthe way.
And guys I got relevant degrees and constantly make small leaps in quantum physics and this shit beyodn my head but I don't think we should be mean cause like this:
Time is merely a depedent rotor for pushing dynamic systems between their various harmonies so that the inherent imbalances in forces are minimised. But this rotary process could concievably be realised because of the interplaced dimensions that register multiple forces thus leaving us to percieve a "time" merely as a sanctimonious resting place of our mind, a dialectic of sorts between opposing forces. This however raises hte work of Lacan and Derrida and whether these dialetical constructs really exist once we envisage them, placing worth in them through our actions and critically through the universe actions. Sort of like the "Big Other" debate and that of the God post ascencion and reified through the holy spirit- their effective existence is as equivalent as the "nothingness" of matter as properly explained by Zizek using the words of Lacan.
QED

[krogothwolf]

Originally Posted by Magic_Marker

Isn't real. Or at least it doesn't work.

Well obviously that's not real and doesn't work, it's only the lego prototype the aliens were building. The real ones lost in the Arctic, or something.

[Seil]

humans know jack about time for certain.

All I know is that time is linear, it always goes forward. Time is a constant, it's always there. It's relative, because depending on what we're doing, it seems to move more quickly than it does. And if your sand meter is empty, you've got to be careful because one rotating spike and your screwed.

EDIT Tahr, just shorten that to "Seil doesn't know anything about time."

[Karrrrrrrrrrrresche]

Originally Posted by Seil

All I know is that time is linear, it always goes forward. Time is a constant, it's always there. It's relative, because depending on what we're doing, it seems to move more quickly than it does. And if your sand meter is empty, you've got to be careful because one rotating spike and your screwed.

EDIT Tahr, just shorten that to "Seil doesn't know anything about time."

[Geminex]

I guess why I'm thinking miles outside of the box is my habit with watching the Stargate series. Small leaps in quantum physics seem so normal to me that something as incomprehensible as this theory is essentially a challenge to myself.

Ok, now can I call him an idiot? Please? Please? Anyone?