Let's Play Thermonuclear War! - Page 4

Flarecobra · 06-30-2010, 09:45 PM

First chance you get, knock out Europe. They'd be the biggest threat.

Geminex · 07-01-2010, 03:44 AM

Thing about Europe is, we can kill them quite easily, but they can kill us... pretty easily as well. Knocking them out ASAP is fine as long as we can do so without retaliation, but I feel like there's quite a large risk that once we start sending bombers and missiles at them, they'll decide to respond in kind.

As such, I'd actually favor an alliance with them. They'll act as a buffer zone, and it'll make them less likely to nuke us. Though failing that alliance, probably destroying them all would be best.

I was hoping we could ally with Eu

Professor Smarmiarty · 07-01-2010, 03:49 AM

Here is a decision chart:
1. Set n=number of enemies+1 Goto 2
2. Are you playing a deranged clone of yourself? If yes set n=n*2 then goto 3. If no go to 3.
3. Set number of nukes required to destroy everybody on earth to l. Goto 4.
4. Set current number of nukes to m. Goto 5
5. Does n*l=m? If yes first go to 7. If no go to 6.
6. Build nukes. Goto 4.
7. First strike everyone.

Geminex · 07-01-2010, 03:53 AM

Shouldn't it be n*m=l?

Other than that, I approve. Sort of. And I'd be interested to see how you handle a chess game.

Bob The Mercenary · 07-01-2010, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smarty McBarrelpants

Here is a decision chart:
7. First strike everyone.

Professor Smarmiarty · 07-01-2010, 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geminex

Shouldn't it be n*m=l?

Nope. You'll leave yourself open to second strikes.
I play chess extreme styles.

06-30-2010, 09:45 PM	#31
Flarecobra Burn. Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Classified Posts: 11,017	First chance you get, knock out Europe. They'd be the biggest threat. __________________ "Only the fool wishes to go into battle to beat someone for the satisfaction of beating someone." -A Thousand Sons Rules. Read them, know them, love them.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-01-2010, 03:44 AM	#32
Geminex SOM3WH3R3 Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 4,606	Thing about Europe is, we can kill them quite easily, but they can kill us... pretty easily as well. Knocking them out ASAP is fine as long as we can do so without retaliation, but I feel like there's quite a large risk that once we start sending bombers and missiles at them, they'll decide to respond in kind. As such, I'd actually favor an alliance with them. They'll act as a buffer zone, and it'll make them less likely to nuke us. Though failing that alliance, probably destroying them all would be best. I was hoping we could ally with Eu

07-01-2010, 03:49 AM	#33
Professor Smarmiarty Sent to the cornfield Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: K-space Posts: 9,758	Here is a decision chart: 1. Set n=number of enemies+1 Goto 2 2. Are you playing a deranged clone of yourself? If yes set n=n2 then goto 3. If no go to 3. 3. Set number of nukes required to destroy everybody on earth to l. Goto 4. 4. Set current number of nukes to m. Goto 5 5. Does nl=m? If yes first go to 7. If no go to 6. 6. Build nukes. Goto 4. 7. First strike everyone.

07-01-2010, 03:53 AM	#34
Geminex SOM3WH3R3 Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 4,606	Shouldn't it be n*m=l? Other than that, I approve. Sort of. And I'd be interested to see how you handle a chess game.