05-05-2010, 06:36 PM | #51 |
Archer and Armstrong vs. the World
|
Wait wait wait wait wait.
We're debating properly hiding spoilers for The Dark Knight? Somebody hasn't seen The Dark Knight? That almost needs its own thread. Clayface is right out of the Nolanverse, but Killer Croc could be done if they went "the cannibal with skin disease" route of the graphic novel Joker. He'd easily be done as a side villain involved in some scenes (kind of like Mr. Zsasz or whatever, certainly not the focus of the movie but he can be in it without much fuss). If they could turn Killer Croc into a full blown and interesting villain I'd be amazed, though. Robin should not be in the movie, unless it's like, right at the end and its implied they will be partners now, since its the end of the trilogy. Like, Dick Grayson can be in it, and maybe he he gets to choose whether or not to kill Tony Zucco and makes the right (Batman) choice to not do it right near the end, but he should never actually be Robin in the movie. EDIT: And a circus should probably not be involved either, because, seriously, a circus? C'mon.
__________________
The Valiant Review Last edited by Magus; 05-05-2010 at 06:54 PM. |
05-05-2010, 07:09 PM | #52 |
Not bad.
|
Depending on how they did it, Deadshot could be a pretty believable villian
|
05-05-2010, 07:47 PM | #53 |
Archer and Armstrong vs. the World
|
Does he have any interesting parallels that could be made with Batman's character/history to advance the movie's theme?
__________________
The Valiant Review |
05-24-2010, 12:28 AM | #54 | |
Super stressed!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 8,081
|
FUCK YES BATMAN MEETS THE NEW RIDDLER (THAT'S SLIGHTLY RUMOR...ISH)
The Trailer
The IMDB Website The Rumor Quote:
Last edited by Seil; 05-24-2010 at 12:41 AM. |
|
05-24-2010, 12:35 AM | #55 |
The revolution will be memed!
|
The riddler seems like pretty natural choice. Hopefully they'll mainly stick with one villain.
__________________
D is for Dirty Commie! |
05-24-2010, 09:04 AM | #56 |
...Really?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: in Theory. Everything works here
Posts: 3,961
|
__________________
I have a Pesterchum its DangerousDoc I am ether fading out of Time, Space, or Reality...Or Simply my Typewriter is running out of ink |
05-24-2010, 12:29 PM | #57 |
Would you deign to supply me food?
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
Posts: 2,004
|
We all know that Neil Patrick Harris would make an awesome Riddler.
Also, he already has Bat-experience. |
05-24-2010, 12:48 PM | #58 |
Archer and Armstrong vs. the World
|
Can anyone explain why the Riddler is "such an obvious choice" despite the comics treating him like a huge joke and his animated version, while having an awesome labyrinth, not really fitting into the Nolanverse, and his most interesting traits like riddles and clues and main motive being co-opted by the Joker in a 2 1/2 hour movie?
There's no new ground here and the old ground doesn't appear to be particularly interesting, either. Throwing Catwoman in there would make more sense at this point to me (I'm not cheering for something so unoriginal but if I had to make a list she'd rate higher than the Riddler). Also fake trailers are interesting but anyone can do that! I can post fake trailers featuring Black Mask and Hush! Even when having both in the same movie would make no sense whatsoever, they're like the same character with different plot devices for what makes them into the supervillain.
__________________
The Valiant Review Last edited by Magus; 05-24-2010 at 12:50 PM. |
05-24-2010, 12:48 PM | #59 | |
Pure joy
|
What's that, an existing and very recent Batman movie thread? WELL I'LL NEVER
Quote:
e: dude Seil not to pick on you but your link to "the rumour" leads to an article that obviously (if badly) makes fun of people who actually take "yeah it'd be fun" as the starting point of a rumour and some might say you could have chosen better. |
|
05-24-2010, 12:56 PM | #60 |
Archer and Armstrong vs. the World
|
They struck me more as people who simply don't have anything to really say about it since there's nothing to actually say other than there is a release date, which is why the article was 60% rhetorical questions and lame attempts at humor based on jokes that are pretty old at this point. Most movie sites are like that, I'm not surprised Cinematical is the same.
__________________
The Valiant Review |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|