03-16-2011, 01:04 AM | #51 | |
History's Strongest Dilettante
|
Quote:
Cheetara and Panthro were, I think, very well rounded characters, and Panthro had dialogue that would be surprisingly good even today. Character designs aside, I don't have a lot of faith that they'll be done nearly so well in the new series, and that'll pretty much kill it for me. But I'll still check it out, 'cause it looks like it at least has a shot at being good.
__________________
"There are worlds out there where the sky is burning, and the sea is asleep, and the rivers dream. People made of smoke and cities made of song. Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there's injustice, somewhere else the tea's getting cold. Come on, Ace; we've got work to do!" Awesome art be here. Last edited by BitVyper; 03-16-2011 at 01:09 AM. |
|
03-16-2011, 01:54 AM | #52 |
synk-ism
|
MUMMRAAA, the EVER POSTING
I challenge all of you to go watch the originals and tell me that's not terrible. Like god-awful campy terrible. Did I watch the fuck out of some Thundercats as a kid? Hell yes. Do I still wear a Thundercats shirt semi-regularly? Most definitely.
But it is an awful show. This "remake" or whatever it ends up being wouldn't have to do much to be better. Fuckin' Ma-mutt.
__________________
Find love.
|
03-16-2011, 01:57 AM | #53 |
Burn.
|
But the campyness was part of it's charm!
__________________
"Only the fool wishes to go into battle to beat someone for the satisfaction of beating someone." -A Thousand Sons Rules. Read them, know them, love them. |
03-16-2011, 02:17 AM | #54 | ||
Blue Psychic, Programmer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Home!
Posts: 8,814
|
Quote:
Or, to put it this way, you can make something "better" that is absolutely terrible because it completely destroys everything good and/or sacred from the original. They could have "better" translated "Kisama!!" as "You son of a bitch!!" rather than "You spoony bard!", but that would have destroyed an iconic line. Thundercats was campy because it was a kids' cartoon. Watch ANY of those and they're campy. But aside from that, it had things that truly were awesome, like some really good characters when you got right down to it. Sure the writing was campy, but the characters really weren't.
__________________
Quote:
Journal | Twitter | FF Wiki (Talk) | Projects | Site |
||
03-16-2011, 02:30 AM | #55 |
synk-ism
|
You seem to think I hate the show.
I get the impression you think I'm holding a children's cartoon to the kind of standards more meant for typical television and/or movie entertainment. Check it -- I get that they're campy and wholesome and easy to follow and all that (it's a shame they didn't seem to be written like many more modern children's cartoons that are easy to enjoy even as an adult). I'm just sayin' it's not a very great show that should be held up on some kind of pedestal that the idea of a remake threatens to collapse or something.
Compare it to other shows you may have watched when growing up, such as the following: G.I. Joe Transformers The Smurfs He-Man (ok wait this one is pretty similarly formulaic) Scooby Doo Rainbow Bright (if you're Fifth) Do they all follow the good-guys-win formula? Sure. Do they often have a throw-away/gag character like Snarf? Sure. Is the acting going to win any awards? Probably not. But Thundercats consistently delivered stale, wooden voice acting and repetitive, rarely varied plots (how many times can Muumm-Ra transform himself before the ancient spirits of evil give up -- oh wait they did, nevermind). I'm pretty sure Lion-o defeated everything in every episode by pointing his sword at it and yelling, "Thunder. Thunder. Thundercasts, hoooooooo!" I may have always known the Joes or Autobots would win, but at least there seemed to be more variation (and before you want to get into a "but here's a breakdown of all the episodes, etc." I am speaking based on memories of the shows, not an empirical analysis, because Jesus Christ); it helped to have a bigger cast perhaps. As a bunch of teenagers/young adults/adults, I'm sure you're capable of looking at the show now and separating your appreciation and fondness of it from an objective look at the show with respect to what a remake may bring to the table. At least it doesn't look like the awful Looney Tunes remake. Also lol'ing at the "reminded of something one of my characters said once". Why not just "something I wrote"? Also also the original Battlestar was campy and hokey, yet the remake sure seems to have been successful; I also don't remember it getting a lot of flak (though I wasn't a fan and wouldn't have been following that news anyway).
__________________
Find love.
Last edited by synkr0nized; 03-16-2011 at 02:47 AM. Reason: missing particle |
03-16-2011, 02:40 AM | #56 |
The Straightest Shota
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: It's a secret to everybody.
Posts: 17,789
|
I was gonna post something like that, Synk, but I didn't feel it was worth it.
Know, however, that I am about 90% behind you. I'm only not 100% behind you because all the old saturday morning cartoons* were similarly terrible compared to even children's cartoons of today. Or of ten years or so ago (Animaniacs and Freakazoid beat the shit out of Thundercats) A lot of people tend to think the opposite but that is sheer nostalgia talking. Even going back and watching a few episodes of GI Joe was physically painful for me as I became embarrassed that I ever liked the show, even as a small child. And Thundercats? Just as bad if not worse. *Exceptions include things like Looney Tunes and Gummie Bears, obviously.
__________________
|
03-16-2011, 02:46 AM | #57 |
synk-ism
|
Look at me, I am still awake for some reason. Oh right I don't sleep.
Probably true, Krylo. I haven't seen most of them in a while, though I have seen Thundercats more recently.
Also, yes, the WB shows are still quite terrific and in a different kind of league, I'd say.
__________________
Find love.
|
03-16-2011, 03:10 AM | #58 | ||
Blue Psychic, Programmer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Home!
Posts: 8,814
|
Quote:
On Thundercats, it was at least on par with the competition at the time. What it lost in wooden dialogue (nobody's arguing with that one) it more than made up for in concept, style, tone, message, and other areas. Heck, I think just the fact that all of the members of the team were individually capable was pretty worthwhile in itself. This is the only show I can think of where a pair of ten-year-olds were capable of whipping out enough tricks to stand on their own two feet until Power Rangers Turbo came out with Justin, which was significantly less awesome (nearly series-ending, actually). I'm not speaking based on childhood memories, either. Or I am, but more recent ones, after I was older and not running around the walls pouring sugar down my throat and kids would have made fun of me if they'd known I was still watching cartoons, much less old ones like that. Speaking objectively, definitely not the best thing ever. But speaking emotionally, a lot of its parts actually meant something, and still COULD mean something in modern society, where instead everything looks boiled down to marketable tropes right down to the character design and the tone has gone decidedly dark and edgy as if it's not the figurative Black Plague of this generation.
__________________
Quote:
Journal | Twitter | FF Wiki (Talk) | Projects | Site |
||
03-16-2011, 04:14 AM | #59 |
The Straightest Shota
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: It's a secret to everybody.
Posts: 17,789
|
Our planet is dead and we're battling the undead for survival! RAINBOWS AND SUNBEAMS!
And the original tone was?
__________________
|
03-16-2011, 05:09 AM | #60 | ||
for all seasons
|
Quote:
Quote:
Especially when I've seen this exact same meme about how The Original Thundercats Was Terrible Go Watch It You'll See pop up, like, everywhere, since the moment things started coming out about this dreadfully unimpressive remake, I mean what is there like, a talking points email bulletin I'm not on, what?
__________________
check out my buttspresso
|
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|