06-30-2010, 02:03 AM | #61 |
Stop the hate
|
I think the funny part is the Katarra Speech in that episode was all about how they should fight even when the chips are down because they are Proud Earthbenders, and She gives them hope not just with the rocks, but with he "Proud" thing. I can only imagine that scene was either
1: recreated whole-cloth, but because they were on land it loses all power 2: Was terrible, terrible comedy Katarra: Hey, Earthbender dudes? Earthbender Dudes: Yeah? Katarra: You know we're on land, right? Earthbender Dudes:........ Katarra: |
06-30-2010, 02:08 AM | #62 |
Local Rookie Indie Dev
|
I'm going with number 1.
__________________
|
06-30-2010, 02:11 AM | #63 |
wat
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,177
|
Reviews? It's out? I thought it came out July 1st.
I mean I know its probably leaked and reviewed six months ago because this is 2010, but seriously. :| |
06-30-2010, 02:17 AM | #64 |
Stop the hate
|
Special Reviewer reviews, methinks.
|
06-30-2010, 02:20 AM | #65 |
wat
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,177
|
Ah well, in a way, I'm glad if it blows, because then the post-movie discussions will be one-sided. One-sided in a horrible way, but still.
|
06-30-2010, 03:37 AM | #66 | |||
Niqo Niqo Nii~
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,240
|
Quote:
Quote:
I must have not been paying attention becuase I did not realize that Aang's actor was actually white. It was more like 'oh random: Eskimos are white and Japanese people are Indian now,ok?' Me and Tiff are discussing this and decided that having Japanese playing roles as the Fire Nation would have been probably a lot more controversial. There's not really anything to be reinforced by having that role filled by Indians whereas Japanese as militant oppressors could have probably been... messy, PR wise. It probably wouldn't have been actually racist since the rest of the cast would have likely been picked out of a more racially diverse group as well, but (ironically) would probably be perceived as such. But yeah I mean, you're pretty much right that since the protagonists are now all white it doesn't really make a difference what 'race' fills the role of the fire nation. Like I said, this could have been a great platform for a lot of talented Asian and Asian-American actors and it should have been since 'looking the part' is actually a pretty big deal in movies. I'm hoping that the story is at least as complicated as it was in the show - the conflict wasn't about the fire nation being evil. It was a few evil rulers. The earth kingdom wasn't exactly innocent in every affair either what with the scheming Dai Li, or even Jet. If it isn't than it really will be white people VS other.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Nique; 06-30-2010 at 03:42 AM. |
|||
06-30-2010, 09:22 AM | #67 | ||
Speed-Suit
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bronies are the new Steampunk
Posts: 2,129
|
There's an interview with Aasif Mandvi on AV Club, but aside from the fact that he got the Zhao job by already being friends with Shimmy, this is the only relevant bit of Avatar discussion-
Quote:
I'm crossing my fingers for Bobb'e J. Thompson.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
06-30-2010, 10:07 AM | #68 |
Sent to the cornfield
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,566
|
White people are easier to market. I mean, we all knew that, but I just figured I'd say it.
Just to say it. I think I'll go see it because I have no preconceptions about the Avatar series. It's always best to see the derivative before the source in my opinion, because then when you finally get around to seeing the source it's even better. (Jurassic Park, for example. I read the book first, which really kind of killed the movie a bit. Still, CG dinosaurs!) |
06-30-2010, 10:22 AM | #69 | ||
Speed-Suit
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bronies are the new Steampunk
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
I mean, unless you subscribe to the blues notion that critics hate 'fun' movies because they (the critics) are all, like, stodgy and shit, the reviews I've seen keep coming back to the same basic point that it's an overly talky film with mediocre to bad action. At least A-Team is stupid-fun in its badness, and there are legitimately good movies you could be giving money to instead (Off the top of my head in theaters: Dogtooth, Winter's Bone, Restrepo, shit, just watch Toy Story 3 again). Unless you meant go see it in the cable-run or legitimately legal sense.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
06-30-2010, 10:53 AM | #70 | ||
Blue Psychic, Programmer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Home!
Posts: 8,814
|
Quote:
My argument is that critics often pan mindless fun, and even that's not universal. Case in point, I liked Prince of Persia because while it wasn't all that deep, it was still a fun ride. Some critics recognized its merits, some panned it for being shallow. It was by no means perfect, but I don't regret seeing it. Obviously, if a movie is neither deep nor even a mindless trip, there's good reason to pan it. Some movies are just bad.
__________________
Quote:
Journal | Twitter | FF Wiki (Talk) | Projects | Site |
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|