Supernatural Mafia

[P-Sleazy]

Again, I did not roleclaim. I gave an example. Theres a difference.

It doesn't mean he saw through it, necessarily. He could have beleived it too and merely dismissed it in hopes that the town wouldn't go looking further into it.

I never said thats what they were. I'm merely stating the possibilities.

[Roy_D_Mylote]

Originally Posted by B_real_shadows

It doesn't mean he saw through it, necessarily. He could have beleived it too and merely dismissed it in hopes that the town wouldn't go looking further into it.

You do realize that that is a weak argument? "Well, maybe he didn't." That's what it comes down to. That is a horrible horrible horrible argument.

[P-Sleazy]

Ok, lets look at this way. He did see through it. What would have happened? He would have pointed it out to clarify things for the town. He didn't. He dismissed it, and worse, didn't even mention it. I'm becoming more and more sure of his guilt the more I have to argue it. Even if I have to use flimsy arguements.

It's still better than what you have against me, a misunderstanding of what I said. You jumped straight to the line of "Roleclaim PO Mr. G is the Cult Leader" and didn't even think about what was said JUST before it. "And you know what the ultimate accusation is?" Or the parts before that. "Plus, I stated for you my theory on how the game works. Someone accuses someone and that someone dies unless he makes a reverse accusation against said person or a better accusation against someone else. It works quite well too (the accusing of someone else)."

Edit: Also, if you look to the rules, and every time a roleclaims been done before, the roleclaim is in BOLD. Not regular text.

Double Edit: It doesn't exactly say in the rules that a roleclaim has to be in bold, but still, everytime its been done, its been done in bold.

[Mr.G.Williams]

Originally Posted by B_real_shadows

Someone accuses someone and that someone dies unless he makes a reverse accusation against said person or a better accusation against someone else. It works quite well too (the accusing of someone else)."

You like an eye for an eye style, eh? Well, I am sure you have heard that makes the world go blind. However, this is not true: It only makes folks who go around stabbing eyes go blind. So far you have spent a good bit of time helping your own sodding' eye get stabbed out...

Oh, quick amusing point:

Originally Posted by B_real_shadows

It was to clarify a point in of mine that the most powerful case someone could bring up against someone is to Roleclaim PO.

So to sum up, I'M NOT THE FUGGING PO!

Originally Posted by B_real_shadows

Yea, it was intentionally unclear so I could see how Mr. G would react to it.

Contradictions are crazy fun!

[P-Sleazy]

Illusions are funner:p

Its an illusion of a contradiction, but its not.

Originally Posted by Me

It was to clarify a point in of mine that the most powerful case someone could bring up against someone is to Roleclaim PO.

So to sum up, I'M NOT THE FUGGING PO!

Thats me clearing the air and clearing up the misconception of the idea of me being the PO. And telling you WHY I did it.

Originally Posted by Me

Yea, it was intentionally unclear so I could see how Mr. G would react to it.

The HOW I did it. I made it murky, but clear. Murky for those who don't read posts fully and/or don't think about them, but clear to those who have an understanding of whats going on.

Edit: Really, do we need to go into the Who, What, When, and Where too?

[Roy_D_Mylote]

Originally Posted by B_real_shadows

Ok, lets look at this way. He did see through it. What would have happened? He would have pointed it out to clarify things for the town. He didn't. He dismissed it, and worse, didn't even mention it. I'm becoming more and more sure of his guilt the more I have to argue it. Even if I have to use flimsy arguements.

It's still better than what you have against me, a misunderstanding of what I said. You jumped straight to the line of "Roleclaim PO Mr. G is the Cult Leader" and didn't even think about what was said JUST before it. "And you know what the ultimate accusation is?" Or the parts before that. "Plus, I stated for you my theory on how the game works. Someone accuses someone and that someone dies unless he makes a reverse accusation against said person or a better accusation against someone else. It works quite well too (the accusing of someone else)."

Edit: Also, if you look to the rules, and every time a roleclaims been done before, the roleclaim is in BOLD. Not regular text.

Double Edit: It doesn't exactly say in the rules that a roleclaim has to be in bold, but still, everytime its been done, its been done in bold.

I'm not even going to bother cutting up your quote this time.

Your point is still utterly unconvincing, and makes no gorram sense. It's based entirely on "Well he's smart." Maybe he didn't point it out because he didn't wanna. I dunno. All I'm sayin' is, how do you argue with a roleclaim?

And the bold is just petty semantics you're digging up to cover up the fact that your arguments are awful.

[Ryanderman]

The HOW I did it. I made it murky, but clear. Murky for those who don't read posts fully and/or don't think about them, but clear to those who have an understanding of whats going on.

Now you're insulting every person who's posted in this thread since you made the "non claim." Almost everyone has thought you were actually trying roleclaim.

Plus, you said you made it clear enough for those who thought about the post to see through what you said, but then used the idea the Mr. G saw through what you said as proof that he's scum? When you intentionally made it possible for people to see through it? You really are contradicting yourself.

Vote: B_real_shadows

[P-Sleazy]

nah, its mostly precedent. I'm working off of precedent here.

Also, I'm not arguing he's smart. I'm arguing the possibility of what would have happened if the other were true. Again Roy, I'm only presenting to you the OTHER arguement. The one you seem to be going for. I've presented what happened, and what could have happened had the other been true. And now you're saying their both not true. Now its "hey he's smart!" Which I never said he was (nor did I say he isn't).

Now lets say he is smart. He would have seen through it, and mentioned something about it. Counter argue against me, Call me a fake, do something about it. not really. He went on saying we don't even know if we have a cult. Trying to distract us AWAY from the cult which is very real and very much so present.

This isn't like in Goodfella's where SP told us there was no cult so I started harrassing Fenris about being the cult head. Here, KP left it up to us to figure out whether there is a cult or not. And I'm telling you I know there is one and it should not be ignored.

EDIT: For Ryanderman. Nah, mostly so I could pick out the those of us who do skip through parts of posts, don't think about them, so I could figure out who's who and going to use what and how and such against me. I'm fairly certain of a few people now.

Double Edit: OOooooo Veil of words!

[The Kneumatic Pnight]

Major Blood (1)
Arhra

Mr. G. Williams (2)
B_Real_Shadows
Demonlink2

B_Real_Shadows (7)
Inbred Chocobo
FenrisWolf
Koko
Newb
Cephrir
Roy_D_Mylote
Ryanderman

Ryanderman (2)
Major Blood

Salookanana (1)
Death by Stabbing

Inbred Chocobo (1)
Salookanana

Twelve to lynch, someotherstuffgoeshererambleoff...
And now back to RO!

[Roy_D_Mylote]

I cannot continue this argument any further. There is just no way I can prove any of my points any more than I already had, and all your points, B_real, are weak things.