10-15-2011, 06:35 PM | #1301 | |
Curious
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
My role is actually the Watcher. Fenris' flavor text indicated that I am the teacher who mentors and watches over her students, such as the Cutie Mark Crusaders. Since the incidents began to occur a few days ago, my concern for the other members of town grew and I would watch out at Night in case anything happened. I can target one player at night to see whoever else targets them. Night 1 - Nikose - Nobody targeted him that night. Didn't know who to scan so early, so I went for a random target. Nothing happened that night. Night 2 - Fawfulcopter - Hawk targeted him. People were starting to consider targeting inactives. I chose between Fawful and Julford, going with Fawful, and I saw Hawk, Rainbow Dash, remove him from the game. Obviously, I wasn't going to post, "Hey, guys! Hawk's the Vig!" without any heavy suspicion placed on him. Then the mafia/SK removed him before he ever needed to roleclaim. Night 3 - Gregness I figured Greg wasn't going to make it through the night with his roleclaim, so I targeted him in hopes of finding scum. I guessed wrong, though, and instead Hawk, Bard, and Ryanderman were targeted. I've been inactive lately because I had exams literally every week and piles of homework on top of that. I checked in every couple of days to read up a bit on what's been going on and whether it was Day or Night for me to submit my role. Aside from that, I've been out. So, I don't know how you figure I'm Nightmare Moon, RO. You could be making that up to get someone you figured to be Town out of the game to help level the balance between Townies and Scum.
__________________
Sneaking around the forums to read your posts. |
|
10-15-2011, 06:42 PM | #1302 |
Lakitu
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,648
|
I don't like your claim Oron, since most of that stuff can be made without a third party supporting or rejecting that claim.
The night actions I feel are very iffy since he could have easily just put two non-targeted members up for listing and then look back at the kill chart and use it to make a night action that returned information. Saying that, I will hold both you and Revolving Ocelot with equal suspicion, since your claim looks weak but then RO's claim is still iffy, even with Sifright's backing. |
10-15-2011, 06:53 PM | #1303 |
Curious
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 208
|
Well, obviously there isn't much to support me with. My support died when Hawk went out overnight, because I was going to add to his claim as Vig if anybody ever voted for him and he had to defend himself.
However, now that I look at it, RO's basically pulled the vote off of greed. It seemed odd to me that he said "You could have said you were Miller," since I don't recall Millers showing up as a Mafia Don. That's pretty high profile. I'm used to them just showing up as Mafiate. But now I think he's just calling me out with that crazy claim to distract everybody else from the bandwagon that was forming, so I really question his alignment.
__________________
Sneaking around the forums to read your posts. |
10-15-2011, 07:39 PM | #1304 |
Douchebag
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Probably somewhere in England.
Posts: 1,897
|
A roleclaim is exactly that - what role you are. So you've just pulled all this out of thin air when you should have said all of this in your first post as part of your actual roleclaim. Just saying "I'm town, hurrrr" is not a roleclaim as that's the default persona anyone posts with.
And you're saying I'm "pulling the vote of Greed" when I SHOWED him to be Mafia as well. No, just no. OTHERWISE I'D HAVE SAID HE WAS TOWN. Hell, I was the person who first started trying to get a vote on him, before and after my Night 2 investigation. He still should be lynched, but I'm thinking going after you first would be a better idea. And don't Millers display as incriminating a status as possible? Displaying as the leader or SK shouldn't be out of the realm of possibility.
__________________
magic sucks |
10-15-2011, 07:58 PM | #1305 | ||
Douchebag
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Probably somewhere in England.
Posts: 1,897
|
Further explanation: I was swapped in on Night 1, so I couldn't really comment on Day 1 actions and such. Sifright was suspicious as hell and had called to be investigated, with the weird assumption that the Cop would immediately out himself to reveal his guilt/innocence. So I took the bait, but didn't act on it. I did defend Sif for every strange moment he had, especially his weird suicide phase. I'd have supported his suicide otherwise.
I decided to do a bit of research on what to do as Cop during Day 2, since I've only played 1/3rd of a Mafia game before. And oh hey, lookie what the Wiki says: Quote:
Wiki also says: Quote:
I figure getting rid of 2 Mafia for 1 Town is a decent compromise. You treat a Cop roleclaim by killing one of his targets, and that'll prove he's right if they turn up guilty. As would being killed by a Night action. If he's not killed, that'll be Mafia trying to pass him off as a fake - which is really not an option now for Mafia, is it? A Cop surviving into endgame is not a risk you can afford. In summary, Oron's been outed as a special role. He turns up Guilty with a lynch, all's good. If he turns up Innocent, you've exposed a Mafiate member posing a Cop.
__________________
magic sucks |
||
10-15-2011, 08:01 PM | #1306 |
Douchebag
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Probably somewhere in England.
Posts: 1,897
|
*As would the Cop being killed by a Night action
__________________
magic sucks |
10-15-2011, 10:01 PM | #1307 |
Never give up. Never give in.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,034
|
Well, looks like someone else decided to shake things up since I did it yesterday.
I'll take some time tomorrow to put up a more detailed analysis. For now, I'd like to put forward a third option. Since IHMN, Oron, and RO all implicate greed it might be wiser to take the easy shot at Greed which would give us time to sort out the roleclaim issue between Oron and RO. Of course, that's the safer route I think. There is something to be said for lynching Oron now since for better or worse we'd end up with more information. Something to stew on tonight.
__________________
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - Robert Heinlein |
10-15-2011, 10:18 PM | #1308 | |
Objectively The Third Worst
|
I still have full confidence in RO and yes, I must agree that a Don is normally the greater threat, sooo
Unvote: Greed Vote: Oron
__________________
Quote:
|
|
10-16-2011, 02:57 AM | #1309 | |
Fact sphere is the most handsome
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,108
|
Quote:
My backing up of Revolving Ocelot technically doesn't mean anything. At least with me he hasn't put anything on to the board that I haven't already said. That said no one is counter claiming as PO and the way to test a PO is to kill one of the targets he lists if we don't have a counter claim. If he is shown to be lying we remove him from the game the next day cycle. |
|
10-16-2011, 05:01 AM | #1310 |
hm?
|
So, I've read up on the events so far. I'd prefer to lynch Oron tonight, in order to check RO's reliability. This way, if Oron turns out scum, it's good and we can use RO as a trusted source (for as long as he survives xP). If he turns out to be a Miller or plain townie, we can set sights on RO afterwards (though we should first take greed then to clean up loose ends, imo).
__________________
Varjojen virta
Kuolemaa kuljettaa Maa on harmaa Sydän poissa taas |
|
|