11-19-2010, 07:02 PM | #11 | ||
Vigilo - Confido
|
Speed stats for a M1 Abrams:
Quote:
And that's a main battle-tank. I'm certain IFV's are a wee bit faster. The German Puma, for instance, can go up to 70 km/h. (First IFV I found stats for. No doubt faster ones exist.) Anyway, these little cars would be pretty perfect for a city-only role. EDIT: And you'd need some family vehicles, of course, like Krylo pointed out. Assuming the city was made exclusive to these cars. But you'd either need heavy financing to have people being able to afford a city-car and an intercity-car, or the public transport system would need to be greatly improved upon.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
11-19-2010, 07:26 PM | #12 |
for all seasons
|
They'll probably sell a shitton of these in Japan/Europe.
Maybe like, three in the US.
__________________
check out my buttspresso
|
11-19-2010, 09:04 PM | #13 | |
Objectively The Third Worst
|
What the fuck does road quality matter when everyone's driving a tank?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
11-19-2010, 09:11 PM | #14 | |
si vales valeo
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Where US HWY 59 and 80 cross
Posts: 4,470
|
Yeah, I won't be one of those guys.
I had a Ford Aspire, a little shoe of a car. Like me and two of my friends once picked it up and moved it to the road cause some asshole blocked me in. TINY, TINY car. Getting on the freeway in that thing was the scariest thing I have ever done. I don't think I would ever buy one of these.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
11-19-2010, 09:33 PM | #15 |
Friendly Neighborhood Quantum Hobo
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Outside the M-brane look'n in
Posts: 5,403
|
The only reasons cars that small are potentially less safe is because we as Americans are generally a bunch of idiots that can't get our heads around the fact that your family car doesn't need to be what amounts to a small armored personal carrier. Unfortunately for those of us who are not idiots and want to drive a smaller more efficient vehicle in a crash relative mass does matter in that if the other guy has twice the mass it's going to be bad for you.
|
11-19-2010, 09:49 PM | #16 |
wat
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,177
|
We likes our cars like we likes our bodies: fat, inefficient, and overcompensating.
|
11-19-2010, 09:52 PM | #17 | ||
Blue Psychic, Programmer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Home!
Posts: 8,814
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Journal | Twitter | FF Wiki (Talk) | Projects | Site |
||
11-19-2010, 09:58 PM | #18 | |
Friendly Neighborhood Quantum Hobo
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Outside the M-brane look'n in
Posts: 5,403
|
Quote:
|
|
11-19-2010, 10:43 PM | #19 | |
Fight Me, Nerds
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,470
|
Quote:
This is none of those things, and pre-desgined to compensate for the fact that it is smaller with enhanced safety features. I would like to see this applied to a slightly larger, think medium-small sized car, 4 passenger 2-by-2 frame.
__________________
|
|
11-20-2010, 01:51 PM | #20 |
Local Rookie Indie Dev
|
It would make a neat town car. Though that would be about it.
Looks cool as fuck from the side and rear though. I'd buy one.
__________________
Last edited by Kyanbu The Legend; 11-20-2010 at 01:57 PM. |
|
|