07-03-2012, 09:18 PM | #11 |
So we are clear
|
The whole unmasking the superhero thing always reminds me of that one scene from DCAU where Luthor is in the Flash's body so he figures this is his chance, takes off the mask, looking into the mirror
"I have absolutely no idea who this is" Peter Parker is a freelance photographer living with his aunt. Not the most famous individual. Sure you could argue he is well known for taking pictures of Spider-Man but you could also argue someone should have put two and two together by now
__________________
"don't hate me for being a heterosexual white guy disparaging slacktivism, hate me for all those murders I've done." |
07-03-2012, 10:29 PM | #12 | |
Archer and Armstrong vs. the World
|
Yeah, that was a good episode, and that's also the way the Comics Curmudgeon went with it:
Quote:
__________________
The Valiant Review |
|
07-03-2012, 11:01 PM | #13 |
So we are clear
|
On a related note, did you know Stan Lee originally didn't want the Green Goblin to be Osborn, originally he wanted the goblin to just be, some guy. Because he felt it was silly that a superhero personally knew or was otherwise connected to all his enemies.
__________________
"don't hate me for being a heterosexual white guy disparaging slacktivism, hate me for all those murders I've done." |
07-03-2012, 11:18 PM | #14 | |
Archer and Armstrong vs. the World
|
Quote:
I don't think any of the creators ever go with their original plans for this stuff, or they end up regretting them. Like Kane and Finger wished that the Joker had killed Bruce's parents instead of just being some guy, but they went with the some guy route. I think they shouldn't bother second-guessing these things--they came up with them 50 years ago, after all, and it all turned out fine in the end. I think I prefer the villains being connected. I think it gives them more personal impetus to bring them to justice. Like even if they are just some guy, they make sure to have them off someone the character cares about to create a personal connection. If they know them personally before they go bad it just adds even more dramatic tension to their eventual battle.
__________________
The Valiant Review Last edited by Magus; 07-03-2012 at 11:20 PM. |
|
07-03-2012, 11:36 PM | #15 |
So we are clear
|
issue was "all his villains" that the Green Goblin was supposed to be the exception to the rule. Otherwise it seems contrived.
And your example of Batman. Works alot better as, some guy. For one it means he better represents the faceless criminal element for him to combat. He isn't getting revenge, he is fighting against crime itself. Plus if it was the joker, defeats joke, to alot of people that would be, motivation resolved. Which you dont want for comics especially Batman.
__________________
"don't hate me for being a heterosexual white guy disparaging slacktivism, hate me for all those murders I've done." |
07-04-2012, 01:17 AM | #16 |
Archer and Armstrong vs. the World
|
Yeah but he can never kill the Joker. So he would never fully get revenge. IF they had went that way. They didn't, they went with Joe Chill who was basically just "some guy" and that works that way, as you say.
That said I like the concept of the Joker just being some guy (but you'll notice they always have him try to kill somebody Bruce likes, such as Gordon, or in the movies his girlfriend), I'm just saying the creators have their second thoughts on the concept, but it turned out just fine. And I think Green Goblin is just fine as a Norman Osborn. Besides, didn't he eventually get his wish in the form of characters like Kingpin/Mysterio/Sandman/Scorpion/Shocker who are only very tangentially related, if at all (can't remember a lot of the origins for some of them)? Or did other people come up with those ones?
__________________
The Valiant Review |
07-05-2012, 03:44 PM | #17 | ||
So we are clear
|
Quote:
Quote:
Kingpin I believe was an expanded universe enemy, he's really Dare Devil's villian. Origin with people like Scorpion and Shocker is they were like brought in or created specifically for Spidey. Though Mysterio and Sandman I think you are correct. Oh and I did some wiki-fu, both were also made by same creators as Spider-Man himself.
__________________
"don't hate me for being a heterosexual white guy disparaging slacktivism, hate me for all those murders I've done." |
||
07-06-2012, 12:33 AM | #18 |
Stop the hate
|
Shocker is very specifically just a random thug. That's pretty much his whole character.
__________________
Drank |
07-06-2012, 02:49 AM | #19 |
Keeper of the new
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: A place without judgment
Posts: 4,506
|
Throughout the seventies and I think eighties Kingpin had quite a grudge match with Spidey. He had the Black Cat made to break Spidey's heart and legs. He was a sumo champion who could at his peak beat up Spider-man with his bare hands. He once had the webslinger institutionalized. I think he was shuffled over to Daredevil as Spidey gained some other villains in the organized crime genre and then Mark Miller set it in stone with his definitive Daredevil origin story.
In Ultimate Spider-man Kingpin was the first villain he faced, and I think they continue to have a pretty unique conflict dynamic - Kingpin as the smug face of corruption and the young idealistic Spidey taking him on using everything from investigative journalism to fat jokes and still losing. Dear Buddha I'm a nerd.
__________________
Hope insistent, trust implicit, love inherent, life immersed |
07-06-2012, 10:02 AM | #20 |
Would you like to save your game?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,638
|
And in the mangaverse, he was a sumo wrestler thing.
|
|
|