01-15-2013, 08:19 PM | #11 | |
Sent to the cornfield
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 870
|
Quote:
Scott Pilgrim was "more palatable" because it was afraid to take the satire to its necessary grandiosity. |
|
01-15-2013, 08:53 PM | #12 |
Lakitu
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,648
|
|
01-15-2013, 11:24 PM | #13 | |
The Straightest Shota
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: It's a secret to everybody.
Posts: 17,789
|
Pretty sure the only thing Bay was thinking was 'SHAKE THE CAMERA AND BLOW SHIT UP'
Quote:
__________________
|
|
01-16-2013, 04:23 AM | #14 |
Sent to the cornfield
|
The racism/sexism was 100% intentional I'm pretty sure.
|
01-16-2013, 04:27 AM | #15 | |
Niqo Niqo Nii~
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,240
|
I guess it depends on what you mean by intentional. They do intend to do those things but the intent is also to pretend that those things are not sexist or racist and just good clean American fun.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
01-16-2013, 04:29 AM | #16 |
Sent to the cornfield
|
By intentional I mean "fuck michael bay"
|
01-16-2013, 05:05 AM | #17 |
The Straightest Shota
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: It's a secret to everybody.
Posts: 17,789
|
Well, what I'm going for is you can't really call it a satire when basically everything he's done (that I'm aware of, at least) has been pandering to the very things you're saying he's now satirizing.
Like, if Jonathon Swift was actually a guy who went and braised and roasted children and ate them, and was known for doing so, and then wrote A Modest Proposal, I don't think anyone would be incorrect to think that maybe it was serious.
__________________
|
01-16-2013, 10:03 AM | #18 | ||
Speed-Suit
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bronies are the new Steampunk
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
I say theoretically because I'm not sure Bay could adequately read that sentence, much less embody it.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|