06-28-2007, 10:54 AM | #201 | |
Pure joy
|
Quote:
As for the relevant laws I have no idea, as much as I could tell they did pretty much go "we don't like Scientology and get out" but then I haven't really been following the news. In fact a quick google search tells me over here it's mostly the less serious news who're picking this up in the first place; MTV news and such. Apparently it's not front page material. |
|
06-28-2007, 11:00 AM | #202 | |
Sent to the cornfield
|
Quote:
I found it interesting while looking at various other movie expenditures that they actually have to pay a nice amount of money, as well as put in the credits a thanks to blahblah, whenever they use any building sanctioned as "Official U.S. Government Property". Than somehow my linking to "related" sites got me to pr0n so I stopped looking... cause work computers suck like that... So that's all I got. Now, if the US did refuse him because he was a Scientologist, they'd have to drum up either a different reason, or just flat out refuse. The minute they link it to him being a scientologist than -that- is where it violates the first amendment, as well as seperation of church and state, and a half a dozen other laws made to prevent persecution and oppression. |
|
06-28-2007, 02:57 PM | #203 |
Goomba
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somewhere in the Uk.
Posts: 24
|
This could be what you're looking for about german law and scientology for reference Scientology and germany
They don't class scientology as a religion, and class it as a business, which could be part of the reason, as well as some of the more questionable tactics the scientologists are alleged to use. |
06-28-2007, 05:29 PM | #204 |
Tyrannus Rex
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 616
|
I'm still confused on what exactly this is about. Did the German gov't say he (Cruise) couldn't use any footage from Germany? Or just that he couldn't film his movie on German military bases? Because if its the latter, I'd have to wholeheartedly agree, I wouldn't want any filming done on a base with potentionally sensitive information either.
*Oh and I hit the 'report post' button on the Christianity is a Cult post before I read Meister's post that he was going to allow it, so I guess you can just ignore that.
__________________
"The Second Amendment is about ensuring the rights of the citizen to be armed, despite [not at] the whims of government or State bureaucracy" "Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready." -Theodore Roosevelt: San Francisco CA, May 13, 1903 "We are all citizens, not a one among us is a serf, and we damn well better remember it" Last edited by Sesshoumaru; 06-28-2007 at 05:32 PM. |
06-28-2007, 07:53 PM | #205 |
That Guy
|
Well, to my understanding they're telling the camera crews "No you may not film in this military building (which I think may be more akin to a museum nowadays) because Cruise is a scientologist and we don't want him in our building."
Note that this wouldn't be filming any current military things; its like requesting to film in the White House or Congress, only (I think) a degree or two less sensitive. It is not, however, an active military building with armed soldiers and stuff on-site.
__________________
The world of truth has no certainty. The world of fact has no hope. "Environmental laws were not passed to protect our air and water... they were passed to get votes. Seasonal anti-smut campaigns are not conducted to rid our communities of moral rot... they are conducted to give an aura of saintliness to the office-seekers who demand them." - Frank Zappa, prelude to Joe's Garage Ever wonder THE TRUTH ABOUT BLACK HELICOPTERS? |
06-28-2007, 10:42 PM | #206 | |
for all seasons
|
Inasmuch as this has branched into generally religious discussion I'm gonna go ahead and bump this into Big Big.
Seriously Aerozord that wasn't called for. You outright said you don't care about the thread's topic - which was mostly about freedom of expression issues - and then pulled out that Christian Axe that you just couldn't help but grind. I actually had looked at this thread and said well okay, maybe a freedom-of-speech thread that sort of tangentally concerns religion can be let go and I'll trust people to keep out of full-blown religious religioning, but I guess I was wrong. Anyway since I'm in here: Quote:
__________________
check out my buttspresso
|
|
06-29-2007, 12:19 PM | #207 |
That Guy
|
Well, Jesus never claimed to be God, nor do we believe it was spelled out as such in the Gospels (the Johannine Comma, the only verse in the Gospels spelling out a divine trinity, was added in later). His divinity was established in the Council of Nicene later. For more info, look up Athanasius and Arius, and their conflict.
As far as being cultish, while it may have begun as a cultish sect of Judaism, it soon enough became its own cultish thing, and then grew up into a full religion, pretty soon after Jesus' death. Probably while St. Paul was still writing, even. Pretty much when they figured out that 1) they were pretty big, and 2) the world is NOT about to end, they began to jump into the "religion" bracket and began to turn from an individual-salvation religion into a social religion.
__________________
The world of truth has no certainty. The world of fact has no hope. "Environmental laws were not passed to protect our air and water... they were passed to get votes. Seasonal anti-smut campaigns are not conducted to rid our communities of moral rot... they are conducted to give an aura of saintliness to the office-seekers who demand them." - Frank Zappa, prelude to Joe's Garage Ever wonder THE TRUTH ABOUT BLACK HELICOPTERS? Last edited by Gorefiend; 06-29-2007 at 04:01 PM. |
06-29-2007, 01:14 PM | #208 |
Worth every yenny
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: not my mind that's for sure!
Posts: 1,299
|
The trouble is that people are thinking of different things when they think of a cult. I've always thought that a cult is simply when people have a religious devotion to something that isn't generally thought of as a religion. Sithdarth apparently sees another picture, where this group also has to be dangerous and destructive somehow.
By the former definition, any young faith would be a cult; it involves religious conviction but is not yet established as a "real" religion (I'm not even going to speculate on the standards for this...). The latter does not necessarily apply to every new faith. Although I would say that when the kind of devotion associated with religion faith is given to anything, the results have potential to be dangerous. |
06-29-2007, 05:16 PM | #209 | |
Bob Dole
|
Quote:
"I am." (Mark 14:60-62) "Yes, it is as you say." (Matt. 26: 63-65) "You are right in saying I am." (Luke 22:67-70)
__________________
Bob Dole |
|
06-29-2007, 05:23 PM | #210 |
Data is Turned On
|
That, by itself, doesn't contradict Gorefiend.
__________________
6201 Reasons to Support Electoral Reform. |
|
|