Mafia: NPF edition

[Inbred Chocobo]

I voted for him because of how he kept reacting to my vote. And twice actually. I got lucky because TheSpacepope was inactive, so restating my vote was something you noticed I did a lot. I figured if the same person tried to get blame on me every time I mentioned that vote, then something has got to be up with that person. Dojin was that person, and so thats where my vote went too.

[Roy_D_Mylote]

What's giving me a bad feeling is dojin hasn't attepmted to defend himself. He may be asleep, I dunno, but he was on last night (it's last night to me, anyway,) and didn't really put up a fight.

[Fenris]

Originally Posted by Roy_D_Mylote

What's giving me a bad feeling is dojin hasn't attepmted to defend himself. He may be asleep, I dunno, but he was on last night (it's last night to me, anyway,) and didn't really put up a fight.

He's actually on right now.

[Roy_D_Mylote]

What if he has some secret role where, if he's lynched, he takes people out with him?

[Fenris]

That would suck.

But it isn't likely. I dunno if GARUD put any of those in this game.

[dojindog]

Originally Posted by Ecurt

Okay, first you say that it's a bad idea to vote for someone who hasn't posted yet. Then you go on to say that there are "better" inactives that we should vote for. Now...how in the world could you possibly know that there are "better" inactives to vote for?

I just had a gut feeling that a vote for SpacePope was a bad idea.

Originally Posted by Ecurt

Next, you then suspect Ogrianes for posting once. Just once. I don't see how that is much better than not posting at all. You didn't even mention what the contents of the post were-leading me to assume that it was indeed just the post count you were looking at.

Yes at that time I was looking at just the post count there I was trying to get people who hadn't posted to post.

Originally Posted by Ecurt

Ah, now we see why you defended TheSpacePope, but it's still an extremely weak reason to defend someone because you like them, and even you admitted that. Even the reason you would give even if you didn't like him seemed weak-especially considering you spend a lot of time saying that people should be aggressive.

See above. I didn't have any strong evidence for not voting SpacePope at the time so I couldn't be aggressive. (Plus I didn't want it to become a big deal like it has now )

Originally Posted by Ecurt

This post in particular bothered me. First off, it was technically their methods that they were talking about, not the persons themselves. It doesn't say much, and what it does can confuse a person unnecessarily.

Well then just change persons to methods and your golden. Sorry if it's confusing it wasn't at the time I was typing it.

Originally Posted by Ecurt

This post bothers me as well, if only because of the comparison with multiple choice tests. You shouldn't just go with your gut instinct if you can't figure out the answer-first, you should eliminate other possibilities, to narrow down what the choices are.

Multiple choice tests are a huge thing in my life recently sometimes it slips through a little bit. I always thought that narrowing down the choices and eliminating the possibilities was something you were automatically supposed to do. One question is gonna be totally wrong one is gonna be mostly right another is gonna be right there with it being right and another one is right on the nose.

Originally Posted by Ecurt

This post...just doesn't make sense. I know what he's trying to say, but the post itself doesn't make sense. It's more method madness, with an emphasis on madness.

I was trying to be funny and make a point at the same time it something rather new to me (on hindsight this probably wasn't the best place to practice it either) but, you got what I was trying to say right?!

Originally Posted by Ecurt

In truth though, you were trying to say a certain playstyle was bad. You even said so in one of your previous posts. Trying to deny that was just as bad as Roy saying he didn't defend Neyo. Then you go and use the time of day as an excuse in case someone forces you to eat your words.

Well it didn't work very well here I'am eating my words . Honestly if that excuse made anyone hesitate to make me eat my words they need to put there brains back in their skulls because that's just ignorant.

Originally Posted by Ecurt

Now these were the two posts that bothered me the most. You just didn't seem to get that innocent people could lose their patience with someone constantly poking at them, and you didn't even stop to consider that someone who has something to hide has already prepared themselves for arguments against their character, and thus may be more restrained than someone who suddenly being accused of something they didn't do.

Those two posts seemed to have botered just about everyone the most. What I'm trying to communicate is that Innocent people have no need to lose their patience after all self-control is what seperates us from animals (people animals). I didn't bother going into the guilty persons side because it wasn't neccesary it's just common sense that a guilty person would have a defense ready.

Originally Posted by Ecurt

At least I'm glad to know that you won't be mad if it turns out you're innocent after all. You just showed us that we were wrong, and should be more careful.

Exactly!

Originally Posted by Ecurt

More blaming the time of day, more admitting it was a bad defense (pity attempt), and you don't understand that once you're lynched it doesn't matter the reason you were lynched.

For the time of day blaming See Above. What seemed like a good defense an hour ago can seem like a major mistake right now.

Originally Posted by Ecurt

Why did I quote these? Because they amused me, that's why.

Haha they are pretty amusing except for that last one that one is just plain truth.

Originally Posted by Ecurt

There are five mafiates and one cult head. Assuming that all of them voted for the same person, that still means one townie is after you. Also, an insta-lynch would have to be at least more than half of the remaining group, which at this moment is thirteen people, so if you're going to be suspecting people because they happen to be voting the same as a large number of people...well, you're going about it wrong. It's who they vote with that you should be paying attention to, not numbers.

And why go after IC? Why not one of the people who decided to join his side? Really, this seems to be just a weak attempt to try to shift votes away from you anyway you can.

Of course, that's just my 5AM opinion. Yes, that was an attempt on humor right there.

The IC vote is a test and that's all I'm gonna say on that.

I enjoyed that joke Ecurt.

Originally Posted by Roy_D_Mylote

I voted for dojin because he tried to shift suspicion to IC right after he was attacked by someone else. That's what got me thinking about how truly off he seemed to me.

I didn't try and shift suspicion onto IC Roy how exactly did you get that?

Originally Posted by Steel Shadow

That's just petty vengance. It's not helping the game, and your reason is that he voted for you. So did other people. Just 'cuase he went first doesn't make him any more likely to be mafia. It actualy makes it less likely.

I don't quite see where you're getting the petty vengance thing please elaborate.

Damn finally that's done I had to update that several times so I wouldn't have to put that damned Edit: Ninja'd but back on task I'am not a mafiate.

Originally Posted by Inbred Chocobo

I voted for him because of how he kept reacting to my vote. And twice actually. I got lucky because TheSpacepope was inactive, so restating my vote was something you noticed I did a lot. I figured if the same person tried to get blame on me every time I mentioned that vote, then something has got to be up with that person. Dojin was that person, and so thats where my vote went too.

Gah! Where exactly did I post suspicion on you twice I know I voted once but that's not through suspicion of you entirely in fact I'm not convinced enough of your guilt so I think I'm gonna try this on someone else in stead Unvote: Inbred Chocobo and in his stead I will Vote: Roy_D_Mylote

[Roy_D_Mylote]

Originally Posted by dojindog

I didn't try and shift suspicion onto IC Roy how exactly did you get that?

I can read:

Originally Posted by dojindog

Okay Okay wait just a second you voted for someone who hasn't even said anything yet?! Are you even aware of how horribly suspicious that is?!

Right the fuck there is where I got it.

Gah! Where exactly did I post suspicion on you twice I know I voted once but that's not through suspicion of you entirely in fact I'm not convinced enough of your guilt so I think I'm gonna try this on someone else in stead Unvote: Inbred Chocobo and in his stead I will Vote: Roy_D_Mylote

So...what reason do you have to suspect me? One that's already been "resolved" as a miswording, or just you're mad because I seem to have started this little wave of dojin-voting.

[P-Sleazy]

eh, Innocent or guilty, odds are you're gonna die tonight anyways (if not lynched) by vigilante or Serial Killer so I might as well help save their kills in hopes of getting their kills on some mafiates ass.

VOTE: Dojindog

[h4x.m4g3]

Originally Posted by dojindog

Umm Garud I unvoted Sithdarth too hehe

Edit: To Ogianres y'know what's even more suspicious 7 people voting for the same person. Upon thinking on this I'am going to Vote:Inbred Chocobo

I wasn't going to vote for you until that post, I was thinking of re-instating my vote but this was the straw that broke the camel's back as they say. It's suspicous when people vote for someone? Isn't that the town's only job/strength, to vote as a unified body and get the mafia lynched?

And now to make things worse, you seem to be randomly throwing around votes hoping to make someone else look scummy, or dig up old arguements.

Vote: Dojindog

edit: to remove smiley

[P-Sleazy]

don't remove smileys H4x M4g3. They show us love and kindness in a thread filled with so much hate and meanness.:p