|
View Poll Results: Best Character | |||
Link | 17 | 60.71% | |
Heihachi | 5 | 17.86% | |
Spawn | 6 | 21.43% | |
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-16-2004, 08:03 PM | #21 | |
Huzzah!
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
So following this reasoning, Tecmo would only allow Hayabusa on a Tecmo game. That way you'd still have to purschase atleast ONE of their products to ever play him. The only difference in what happenned on the GC version of SC and the PS2 version is that for the PS2 Namco provided one of their mascots, in the GC version it was Nintendo's mascot. It was still only the software company, and the hardware company involved in all the liscensing issues. If you bring in an entirely seperate mascot from yet a third buisness, (Microsoft, McFarlane, Namco on the X-box) it's still not a big thing to work out because that third company still doesn't market anything in direct competition with the other two. So it's just a cool advertising gimmick. However, to expect Tecmo to allow one of their characters to be used in a rival software companies game like Namco (not to mention another fighter which is almost direct competition) IS a little too much to expect. While we see it as a really cool collaboration between two rival companies to bring something neat to fans of fighters, I'm sure they see it as a potential marketing/liscensing nightmare. Companies might like to cater to us to a degree, but first and foremost is money. If either company wants to boost sales of their products they wouldn't turn to each other. It's like Pepsi and Coke running an add compaign together. It's not mind reading something from an alternate reality, it's common buisness sense right here right now. Yes, it technically COULD happen, but I feel pretty safe in saying it simply won't. That's all. |
|
05-16-2004, 08:30 PM | #22 | |||||
for all seasons
|
Quote:
Pepsi and Coke are competing in what is essentially a duopoly. Tecmo and Namco are not mortally opposed, they are two game makers in a market glutted with game makers (even with fighting game makers). Thus anything they can do to stand out from the crowd is a positive. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In any event, this is all moving quite thoroughly off-topic, and I personally am moving on.
__________________
check out my buttspresso
Last edited by Fifthfiend; 05-16-2004 at 08:37 PM. |
|||||
05-16-2004, 09:45 PM | #23 | ||
Huzzah!
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
Since CapcomVSSNK was a product put forth by both companies together, it's a little more 50/50. It's in the title after all, and yes that was a great move on their parts. At least I enjoyed the heck out of it. At any rate this would have something more subtle and not as readily obvious to the public. That's why it could happen, I just don't think it's likely. I think (yes, me thinking and speculating) that in Tecmo's eyes if something like this was brought to them, their wouldn't be enough "recognition" for their part of the contribution. Perhaps they'd worry that with just one character making a guest appearance it would make them appear like a weaker talent, and detract from their image since they only have one character in a game full of the other companie's folks. I personally wouldn't think this and be all for it, but I don't think that Tecmo would be willing to risk it. Speculation again, I know. It is legal, after all. Quote:
|
||
05-16-2004, 10:13 PM | #24 | |
The Glorious Number One
|
Quote:
__________________
"Revenge is a dish best sereved cold. And it is very cold in outer space" --Kahn Last edited by TheSpiritOfVengance; 05-16-2004 at 10:17 PM. |
|
|
|