01-15-2006, 12:37 PM | #301 | |
The Obfuscated One
|
I would simply like to take this chance to remind everyone that if a team wins, everybody on that team wins, including the dead people.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
01-15-2006, 12:47 PM | #302 |
Bitches love the crown
|
Raiden's list of posts. If we are going to lynch him, lets at least make sure we are sure of this.
His first post involved a little rping, which most people were doing for the hell of it, so I believe all rping should be ignored when considering who to lynch. His second was a FoS towards Psycho Mantis. All because of what he was rping. His next was just helping with the second. Next he listed a few people he was suscipcious of. Actually it was people he said that the police officer should check, but its the same thing. Those people are Inbred Chocobo, Pyros, Psycho, and Kikuichimonji. Next he was defending his desicions based on rping. He also stated the fact that people were picked randomly. He also said we can not base who we accuse on what that person has in the sig/avatar. He then defended himself from my vote, in which I changed. Now Newb was killed. Raiden hadn't voted for him, which he may have done to keep people from suspecting him, or did it because he really though that Newb wasn't a mafian. Next post Raiden starts accusing SK, mostly based on how she is acting. He also throws out a little suspicions towards Patrat, due to the fact he joins SK in voting for no reason and the face that Patrat broke the rules by discussing outside the game. Patrat started defending himself against Raiden's suspicions, and Raiden's next post involved keeping this up. Now votes against Psycho Mantis start building up. Soon Raiden comes in and started defending Psycho, and at the end of his posts goes for Patrat. Mostly because Raiden doesn't trust him. Right after Mestizio was lynched, Raiden said he was surprised that we got a mafian. Raiden said that he was trusting SK now, due to the fact she lead the charge against Mestizio. Raiden's next post involved defending himself when he was one vote away from being lynched. He also kept on his assault towards Patrat, still going on about how he broke the rules. His next post was ask Mestizio not to defend him, along with people asking to think before you vote. His next was defending himself from TWG's post, going on about how his accusations towards Psycho was based on what he was rping, which he himself said made no significance. He also attacked TWG's phrase that Psycho had to vote for Raiden. Raiden way of acting seems a little suspicious to me when you look at the big picture. He seems like a dog with a bone with that Patrat breaking the rules, he just won't let it go. It looks like a simple mistake. Raiden seems to have not take any part in any votes that have lynched someone. This says to me that Raiden is trying to hide in the background. If I missed anything, would someone please correct me. |
01-15-2006, 12:50 PM | #303 |
SMARTASS
|
I'm suspicious of Raiden, but I don't really want to lynch him until I have more evidence, PM hasn't completley convinced me of his innocence either, so I'm going to wait with my vote for a few more hours.
__________________
Do geese see god? Everyone is an asshole. Including me. Especially including the double asshole who read this and nodded smugly. |
01-15-2006, 01:21 PM | #304 |
Underachiever
|
I'm going to say Unvote: Raiden.
yeah, teh Don came back from the grave to defend him. but i'm willing to bet that he did that more to disrupt the pursuit of justice, and to get us to lynch another innocent.
__________________
"There was another, who came before you he was a hero and your brother and my son he fought the darkenss, the darkness won" -The Protomen "Unrest in the House of Light" |
01-15-2006, 01:24 PM | #305 |
THE SUPREME COURT DID WHAT?
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arkansas (for now)
Posts: 1,477
|
How can you unvote when you didn't vote in the first place?
And Mestizo is a she. She isn't allowed to post after her lynch. I'm still pissed off about that. ChaztheMonk Last edited by The Wandering God; 01-15-2006 at 01:41 PM. |
01-15-2006, 01:34 PM | #306 |
Underachiever
|
retractions: oh, why did i think you could cast a protective vote? although she may not be allowed to post after being dead she still did so.
accusations: Wandering God. I'm not as certain about this, but i'm standing with my decision. Raiden you fucker, you better not make me regret this.
__________________
"There was another, who came before you he was a hero and your brother and my son he fought the darkenss, the darkness won" -The Protomen "Unrest in the House of Light" |
01-15-2006, 01:41 PM | #307 |
THE SUPREME COURT DID WHAT?
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arkansas (for now)
Posts: 1,477
|
Okay, why are you accusing me? What logic or evidence do you have to go on? What have I done that's suspicious?
The Wandering God |
01-15-2006, 02:01 PM | #308 |
Underachiever
|
well, as i am certain of Raiden's innocence, wouldn't it make sense for me to accuse the person leading the charge against him? you seem to be the most vocal in this, and as there really arn't any other leads to make logical guesses on, you're it for the time being.
__________________
"There was another, who came before you he was a hero and your brother and my son he fought the darkenss, the darkness won" -The Protomen "Unrest in the House of Light" |
01-15-2006, 02:09 PM | #309 | ||
Yar.
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
01-15-2006, 02:13 PM | #310 | ||
THE SUPREME COURT DID WHAT?
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arkansas (for now)
Posts: 1,477
|
How can you be certain? Are you the police officer? Or another mafia member? Those are the only two ways to know for sure.
And let's see what you posted so far: 1st post: Quote:
2nd post: Quote:
The other posts can be seen on this page. So, if you are claiming to be a police officer, you should have been a heck of a lot more active. Also, anyone with common sense would not come out and publicly accuse for no basis. I would hope the officer had a bit more sense. The Wandering God |
||
|
|