11-01-2011, 10:08 AM | #371 |
Not a Taco
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,313
|
I'll be honest, I don't know what tells you if someone is culty or not. The only game we had a cult in, they were all killed off N1.
The thing is though, I think the cult is scary, since they can get powerful, instead of just leaving the town weakened. And people want to react to that. But I'm holding off on actually voting yet, since you guys have just sort of gone, "Well, he's culty by acting like a culty dude." If there's reason to believe that he's cult, I'd like to know it, but until then, you guys could be "independently" verifying that, "Man, he's a cult dude.", while being the cult yourself. I have no idea about that whole thing though, so I'm not gonna vote based off of it. RO, on the other hand, is lighting up almost as much as Aldurin. The fact that he wanted the town to throw away a lynch is really suspicious.
__________________
I did a lot of posting on here as a teenager, and I was pretty awful. Even after I learned, grew up, and came to be on the right side of a lot of important issues, I was still angry, abrasive, and generally increased the amount of hate in the world, in pretty unacceptable ways. On the off chance that someone is taking a trip down memory lane looking through those old threads, I wanted to devote my signature to say directly to you, I'm sorry. Thank you for letting me be better, NPF. |
11-01-2011, 10:35 AM | #372 | ||||
Fact sphere is the most handsome
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,108
|
Quote:
Quote:
My post nearly immediately afterwards shows my thoughts on what the night flavor text amounts to, ofcourse I could be wrong but I don't believe my analysis of the night flavor text to be in error. Fenris is clearly the SK as a child murderer certainly doesn't fit MO of the Mafia nor in truth of the Vigilante. The next kill we have is Fenris being shot in the back Initially my thoughts were it could be either the Mafia or the Vigilante however the next kill on Bard nixed that thought as the Mafia have in the past performed murders in exactly that manner slicing and hacking the corpse into pieces is an effective scare tactic and was used by the Mafia in real life in the past. Moogles death/suicide at first came as a bit of a shock to me as I didn't see what could have caused it how ever on reflection I realized that if there is a cult and that they could recruit Mafia then the cult would very quickly grow to powerful so instead of recruiting mafia players the cult leader instead kills Mafia players. Now we come to where I start to get some evidence for my thoughts on Geminex being the cult leader. Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Sifright; 11-01-2011 at 10:37 AM. Reason: Kerensky for Bard |
||||
11-01-2011, 10:50 AM | #373 | ||||
War Incarnate
|
Sif, while you raise some interesting points regarding Geminexs posts, there IS a suicide role that simply causes the death of the player at a determined time. I think it was Gem who even posted it here before, but I'll link it again in case it slipped anyone by;
Suicidal Quote:
Quote:
Also thinking from a cult perspective, if Geminex was the cult leader, why would he propose that somebody whose death looks like a possible cult leader death is in fact a suicidal role? Surely if he was cult leader himself he would propose that the cult leader has died, thus making everyone think that the cult is gone and no longer a threat. That's some shaky logic man.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
11-01-2011, 10:53 AM | #374 |
Sent to the cornfield
|
I was comng at Gem as Cult Leader from a differnet angle- his tailing of other high profile players, getting them to take the bullets as it were, while also agreeing with them to prevent htem turnin gon him. Gem was playing beta dog strategy while he seems like an alpha type to me which is why I came at him as cleader- not much to do with day 2 moogle posts (didn't even occur to me till Sif posted).
Two of us came indepedentely on Gem for different reasons, that is reason to be suspicious. But he hasn't posted uyet |
11-01-2011, 10:55 AM | #375 | |
Fact sphere is the most handsome
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,108
|
Quote:
It's not shakey logic because he was trying to skate by with out even showing the existence of the cult I first postulated the existence of the cult AFTER he said it was a suicide role after which He then tried to say it was more likely that the cult leader died doing that. |
|
11-01-2011, 11:13 AM | #376 | ||
War Incarnate
|
Ok yeah, going back and reading it again, I can see your point. He didn't even think of Moogles death as cult related so it looks odd in retrospect. To be fair, the fluff wasn't too revealing either and it did seem to imply Moogle as a suicidal.
Duno if the makes Gem culty or not though. If I was the cult leader and I saw somebody die like that, I'd have jumped on the chance to propose that the CL was dead, but then I read Sun Tzu. Appear weak when you are strong, appear strong when you are weak. If everybody thought the cult was dead, then they wouldn't be looking for any cult tells, which if you're the CL buys you the time you need to start winning.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-01-2011, 11:19 AM | #377 | |||||
Fact sphere is the most handsome
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,108
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Well, the issue with that is going "The cult is dead" Is well how the hell do you know that? It would straight up bring suspicion because moogle flavor death doesn't tell you that it just says he committed suicide given that his suicide did nothing else and that I refuse to accept that bookie would give out a role which is "Lawl you get to die night one if you actually play" it's logical to presume there is something going on underneath that hence the cult mafia interaction thoughts I had. |
|||||
11-01-2011, 11:25 AM | #378 | ||
War Incarnate
|
So... what do you think happened with Moogle then? Becuase I only see 2 possibilities; either he was a suicide role, or he was the CL who tried to attack a mafiate and died. You're saying it can't be the former, yet also saying Gem is the CL, so what does that make Moogle?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-01-2011, 11:26 AM | #379 | |
SOM3WH3R3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
|
Okay, this kinda... completely comes out of the left field.
In regards to playstyle, I honestly have to let you guys be the judge of that. I don't think that deviation from my previous bhavior is ground for suspicion, though. By all means, call my behavior into question, but if you say "His behavior now deviates from his behavior in the previous game!", then that isn't an accusation. It's a statement of the obvious. Playstyles change. People adapt to situations. And given that this is my second game, I don't think I have a "standard playstyle" to fall back on. I guess I was a bit more hesitant in this day 1 than in the last, but that's mostly cause my D1 suspicions, with the exception of nikose were pretty wildly off-course. Plus, last game somebody thought I was being overagressive, and I thought I'd try surviving past D2 this time. In regards to smarty... buddying up with the more vocal players? Really? I stayed away from your Snake lych in D1, though I didn't fight it too much, and I've already argued with you a few times during D2. Sure, I ended up agreeing with you sometimes, I genuinely thought your p-sleazy argument was interesting, and I gave in on the moogle argument just so we could make some headway. But that doesn't mean I'm hiding in your shadow. I make up my own mind, I'd be an idiot not to. As for the moogle thing... Seriously? I mean, not to diminish your sleuthing prowess, but I interpreted the data of the nightkill. It told us a player had committed suicide. I assumed that the suicidal player had the suicidal role, given that the situation matched the description of this role pretty exactly. I even posted a link to back up my argument, which you apparently didn't notice. My point is, I'm not making wild, manipulative conjenctures here. I made the logical argument that the guy who commited suicide might have done that because he was suicidal. I don't see how you can consider that culty. And you'll note that once people elaborated on their arguments a bit, I came to agree. Because that's what I try to do, find the most likely explanation for something. The trilby hat didn't fit into the "Suicidal" or the "Cultist" role, so I went along with the explanation that moogle was likely mafia. And given that assumption, the only real reason for mafia I could think of, was as a mechanism to avoid mafia recruitment by the cult. Aaaand I just previewed, and you lot have been posting again. Quote:
As for smarty considering me an alpha, I'm flattered, but sceptical. I've made my own mind up. I drew a few obvious conclusions, a few less obvious ones, which I then argued quite willingly. If you guys made logical points, I gave in, if not, I upheld my argument. If I seem less sure to you, I think the situation in this game is a lot more murky than the last. And, again, most of what you've seen of me is D1, so far, and I think my holding back over there was justified. I get that this is just a hunch for you. I just don't think it's a particularly good hunch. As for Sifright's latest post, again. I was throwing options out there. When you guys made logical counter-arguments, I accepted those. I didn't go "THE CULT IS DEAD NOBODY ARGUE". I first assumed that moogle had been suicidal, which I thought was a reasonable assumption. When the cult-mafia interaction was brought up, I thought that it would make sense for the cultist to die, rather than the deadly mafiate. I suggested both possiblities, yes. But there's a difference between making an argument and trying to force an argument on others. Also, think, when you quote multiple posts, that you could highlight the important bits? |
|
11-01-2011, 11:28 AM | #380 |
SOM3WH3R3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
|
Also, Hawk, the assumption we're going with is that moogle was a mafiate, and that he suicided when the cult tried to recruit him. That's partly what we're basing our suspicions of p-sleazy around.
|
|
|