02-22-2009, 02:06 PM | #451 |
Why so sad?
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 4
|
If I may chime in, it appears that we killed Zilla with 1 less vote than we needed. Not sure if this has any relevance or not. Just pointing it out.
As for who to lynch, I think I'll Vote: Cephrir. Going by SMB's logic, lynching Tendronai seems to be a bit uncertain. He was reported originally by Colbert, who, if what SMB says is true, is almost certainly paranoid due to his most recent report. The Zilla answer might be media echoing, which would make sense due to the results from Hannity's night 3 investigation. Right now we are most uncertain about O'Rielly's accuracy, so lynching Cephrir will test that. |
02-22-2009, 02:47 PM | #452 | |
Curious
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
Vote:Cephrir Following a media report.
__________________
Sneaking around the forums to read your posts. Last edited by Oron; 02-22-2009 at 02:51 PM. |
|
02-22-2009, 06:25 PM | #453 |
With no _s!
|
Stressball and Oron for Illuminati.
Vote: Tendronai
__________________
:rmage: See, anytime you do anything, the_e is a one in twenty chance that you will c_itically fail. |
02-22-2009, 07:06 PM | #454 |
Why so sad?
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 4
|
I'm not Illuminati. If SMB really is the independent, then Stephen Colbert is also paranoid, as he accused SMB of being Illuminati-aligned on Night 4. Seeing if O'Rielly is accurate, which we still aren't quite certain of, is much more valuable for us as a town.
|
02-22-2009, 07:18 PM | #455 |
Curious
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 208
|
Yeah, I'm voting on what O'Reilly reported a couple days ago to test the validity of his reports, and O'Reilly's usefulness to town. Voting on Zilla did remove the Libertarian party, but that was multiple reports from different reporters. Better to find out which specific members of the media are correct and which ones are echoing, no?
Edit: Listed Zilla under wrong party. Oops.
__________________
Sneaking around the forums to read your posts. |
02-22-2009, 09:19 PM | #456 | |
Hoopy Frood
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
So here's another "only at Cati's word" investigation -- I also got that Relm was a reporter. Sorry that I suck. You can take what you want from that. I will try to be less of a moron in the future. *headdesk* I'll even investigate her again if you guys want me to. Edit: And I forgot -- Vote: Tendronai Since that's two investigations of him being Illuminati, publicized and everything! I'll comment more on SMB's theory later, I'm not sure that I'm following it completely. I will dissect it in a bit.
__________________
- Cati Last edited by Cati; 02-22-2009 at 09:22 PM. |
|
02-22-2009, 11:04 PM | #457 |
Lakitu
|
Hn...
You know what, screw all this. I say we take a third option! Vote: Ecurt Take that bitches! |
02-23-2009, 12:27 AM | #458 |
Who am I again?
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 595
|
Don't waste another investigation on me, I believe your a reporter. Just keep in mind-Just because somebody is one of the reporters doesn't mean that they haven't been culted.
|
02-23-2009, 12:45 AM | #459 |
Curious
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 208
|
Yeah, I was about to say that since Cati has been reported as media, there's a strong chance she'll be culted come next day. We'll have to consider any reports coming from her with care. Identifying her makes her a target.
... We are still throwing around the possibility of media being culted, right? I've missed a bit with other issues taking my time.
__________________
Sneaking around the forums to read your posts. |
02-23-2009, 03:40 AM | #460 |
hm?
|
Personally, I don't think culted Media's that big of a priority to impeach, even if we lynch one, the cult leader will just recruit a new member, making them break even through a day+night. This is assuming a media member can't be a lobbyist as well (or some other similar extra role).
|
|
|