Nuklear Wright, Power Attorney Case 3: Initial Complex - Page 5

Demonlink2 · 01-15-2008, 08:09 AM

Now Moogle, I have some questions for you. Solely to clear things up before I begin striking down. If I may ask, what blackmail did he have hanging over your head? It seems to me that this blackmail is valuable evidence within this court, so I ask that you submit it as such.

In addition, do you have anything to support your pseudo-alibi concerning the promise of co-GMship? Please maintain to things from this forum, such as a screenshot of a PM, for proof that it could only be my client that was doing this. I ask for material from this forum as it cannot be falsified as easily as text data, such as an AIM conversation or a RaiRO /savechat (These are examples; I'm not making a strike at Newb again). My client denies these claims, and as such I feel that I can only be moved to your cause with decisive evidence. If you are having trouble attaining a screenshot, I'm sure the court will assist you by showing you how to take one. If you have deleted the proof, I'm afraid I cannot accept this claim and will do everything I can to disprove it.

Moogle0119 · 01-15-2008, 09:12 PM

Very well. I knew once I agreed to testify against POS Industries that the secret would be revealed but I am willing to accept this now. During the course of my collaborations with the defendant, he asked me what my most embarassing yet favorite game was. I was hesitant to respond at first, but he offered to tell me first by letting me know that Custer's Revenge was his favorite. As reluctant as I was, I shared with him the knowledge that I secretly loved Ghostbusters. If the court wishes to have this part of my testimony as evidence they can have it, everyone knows now there's no point in trying to hide my shame any longer.

As to your other question as to whether or not I still have the PM I can't say that I do and I would not wish to falsify such an important document such as the PM where POS Industries broke his promise only to recreate what he was said. It was from over two months ago now when those PMs were sent between us and unfortunately I have had to wipe my inbox and sent-box clean since then due to a lack of space and no knowledge I would be called on to use this against POS Industries in the future. I'd like to point out that if even if I had kept the PM for such an extended period of time wouldn't it seem out of place to hold on to it without knowing a trial would be happening?

It seems as though the chat logs I have had with POS Industries on AIM are not legitimate enough to be considered as further proof. My word should be good enough, might I remind Mr. Wright that it is POS Industries whose character is up on trial not my own.

Demonlink2 · 01-16-2008, 07:16 AM

Now, I have one last question before I move on...

When did you discuss this with my client? A specific date, if you please. I am unsure if your AIM conversations recorded one, but I ask that if they did, that you submit them now. I will not acknowledge any text within it past the fact that it was a discussion of the game at hand, but merely request the date.

Moogle0119 · 01-16-2008, 03:19 PM

Very well Mr. Wright. The AIM conversation took place on Saturday November 3, 2007. I find it questionable that my evidence is not being asked to help decide this case, but I suppose Mr. Wright is more interested in playing favorites than finding the truth. I hope justice is brought to POS Industries, he is a fiend much like yourself Mr. Wright.

Demonlink2 · 01-16-2008, 03:39 PM

And that slipup is where the relevence happens and where your testimony shatters.

I direct the court's attention to this hyperlink here.

As you will find by following it, this is my client's game. However, the game was started in May. I think you see where I'm going with this, Witness and Edgeworth.

For the Judge's sake, I'll spell it out. The game started on May 30, 2007. The witness claimed a conversation for an idea on November 3. Therefore,

The witness is clearly lying, and the defense requests he repair what testimony he has left, or that a new witness enter the stands.

((OOC: I love that zoom gif. It helps emphasize.

)

Mirai Gen · 01-16-2008, 07:19 PM

...

Well done Wright.

You've 'slain the dragon' as they say. It took you well over three explanations to find that my witness was talking about a conversation in November. Truly nobody has the skills of attention quite like you.

However, I should like to point something out to you.

If you would recall, when this trial started, the thread linked to was indeed Nuklear Power Forums Avatar Thread 5. However, there is a key difference:

When this court began, the judge linked to a completely separate thread! Wright, in your haste, you forgot to account for one key thing. My witness

was referring to the other NPF Avatars 5 thread, found here!

Your Honor, this objection is meaningless. My witness is not lying; when he spoke of 'before the game started', he was referring to the continuation thread that was opened late November.

I would also like to add that the defense is simply wasting time trying to find irrelevant discrepancies in the testimony. I request that we move on.

***Fenris*** · 01-16-2008, 07:30 PM

Not so fast, Edgeworth. How could Moogle co-run a RP that was already started? Furthermore, how could POS have stolen an idea 6 months prior? I merely submitted the "Unsatisfactory Ending" to the Court Record, not the whole thread. The rest of the thread is provided for context. I hope your other witness has a more convincing case than this one did, for your sake.

At any rate, I believe unless there is more to be said on this topic and it is about time the defense call their first witness to the stand.

Mirai Gen · 01-16-2008, 07:37 PM

Your Honor, my client said "Before the last NPF Avatar game was to be held." He has also testified that he had 'yet to join the Roleplay section of the forums'. I believe he was not aware that there was a previous Nuklear Power Avatar thread before the one that was made November 25th.

***Fenris*** · 01-16-2008, 07:43 PM

While I accept this fact, that does not change my ruling-or my opinion. Your client also testified that the whole thing was his idea, which quite frankly is the part I'm more interested in.

Mirai Gen · 01-16-2008, 07:46 PM

Sigh. Very well, your honor.

(I have to talk to my secretary about which cases she accepts for me...)

01-15-2008, 08:09 AM	#41
Demonlink2 TOON ISAAC Join Date: May 2006 Location: University of Florida Posts: 387	Now Moogle, I have some questions for you. Solely to clear things up before I begin striking down. If I may ask, what blackmail did he have hanging over your head? It seems to me that this blackmail is valuable evidence within this court, so I ask that you submit it as such. In addition, do you have anything to support your pseudo-alibi concerning the promise of co-GMship? Please maintain to things from this forum, such as a screenshot of a PM, for proof that it could only be my client that was doing this. I ask for material from this forum as it cannot be falsified as easily as text data, such as an AIM conversation or a RaiRO /savechat (These are examples; I'm not making a strike at Newb again). My client denies these claims, and as such I feel that I can only be moved to your cause with decisive evidence. If you are having trouble attaining a screenshot, I'm sure the court will assist you by showing you how to take one. If you have deleted the proof, I'm afraid I cannot accept this claim and will do everything I can to disprove it. __________________ Wanna play a game of chance? Turn off your lightswitch, and we'll see if another person in the room turns into Uboa. ҉Apeture science is your trusted friend in the field of science.҉

01-15-2008, 09:12 PM	#42
Moogle0119 The REAL Lord of the Dance Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Narshe Caves Posts: 397	Very well. I knew once I agreed to testify against POS Industries that the secret would be revealed but I am willing to accept this now. During the course of my collaborations with the defendant, he asked me what my most embarassing yet favorite game was. I was hesitant to respond at first, but he offered to tell me first by letting me know that Custer's Revenge was his favorite. As reluctant as I was, I shared with him the knowledge that I secretly loved Ghostbusters. If the court wishes to have this part of my testimony as evidence they can have it, everyone knows now there's no point in trying to hide my shame any longer. As to your other question as to whether or not I still have the PM I can't say that I do and I would not wish to falsify such an important document such as the PM where POS Industries broke his promise only to recreate what he was said. It was from over two months ago now when those PMs were sent between us and unfortunately I have had to wipe my inbox and sent-box clean since then due to a lack of space and no knowledge I would be called on to use this against POS Industries in the future. I'd like to point out that if even if I had kept the PM for such an extended period of time wouldn't it seem out of place to hold on to it without knowing a trial would be happening? It seems as though the chat logs I have had with POS Industries on AIM are not legitimate enough to be considered as further proof. My word should be good enough, might I remind Mr. Wright that it is POS Industries whose character is up on trial not my own. __________________ One day the tides will turn One day the fields will burn One day the seas will churn The fury of our maker's hand What will you do?

01-16-2008, 07:16 AM	#43
Demonlink2 TOON ISAAC Join Date: May 2006 Location: University of Florida Posts: 387	Now, I have one last question before I move on... When did you discuss this with my client? A specific date, if you please. I am unsure if your AIM conversations recorded one, but I ask that if they did, that you submit them now. I will not acknowledge any text within it past the fact that it was a discussion of the game at hand, but merely request the date. __________________ Wanna play a game of chance? Turn off your lightswitch, and we'll see if another person in the room turns into Uboa. ҉Apeture science is your trusted friend in the field of science.҉

01-16-2008, 03:19 PM	#44
Moogle0119 The REAL Lord of the Dance Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Narshe Caves Posts: 397	Very well Mr. Wright. The AIM conversation took place on Saturday November 3, 2007. I find it questionable that my evidence is not being asked to help decide this case, but I suppose Mr. Wright is more interested in playing favorites than finding the truth. I hope justice is brought to POS Industries, he is a fiend much like yourself Mr. Wright. __________________ One day the tides will turn One day the fields will burn One day the seas will churn The fury of our maker's hand What will you do? Last edited by Moogle0119; 01-16-2008 at 07:05 PM.

01-16-2008, 03:39 PM	#45
Demonlink2 TOON ISAAC Join Date: May 2006 Location: University of Florida Posts: 387	And that slipup is where the relevence happens and where your testimony shatters. I direct the court's attention to this hyperlink here. As you will find by following it, this is my client's game. However, the game was started in May. I think you see where I'm going with this, Witness and Edgeworth. For the Judge's sake, I'll spell it out. The game started on May 30, 2007. The witness claimed a conversation for an idea on November 3. Therefore, The witness is clearly lying, and the defense requests he repair what testimony he has left, or that a new witness enter the stands. ((OOC: I love that zoom gif. It helps emphasize. ) __________________ Wanna play a game of chance? Turn off your lightswitch, and we'll see if another person in the room turns into Uboa. ҉Apeture science is your trusted friend in the field of science.҉

01-16-2008, 07:19 PM	#46
Mirai Gen We are Geth. Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 14,032	... Well done Wright. You've 'slain the dragon' as they say. It took you well over three explanations to find that my witness was talking about a conversation in November. Truly nobody has the skills of attention quite like you. However, I should like to point something out to you. If you would recall, when this trial started, the thread linked to was indeed Nuklear Power Forums Avatar Thread 5. However, there is a key difference: When this court began, the judge linked to a completely separate thread! Wright, in your haste, you forgot to account for one key thing. My witness was referring to the other NPF Avatars 5 thread, found here! Your Honor, this objection is meaningless. My witness is not lying; when he spoke of 'before the game started', he was referring to the continuation thread that was opened late November. I would also like to add that the defense is simply wasting time trying to find irrelevant discrepancies in the testimony. I request that we move on. __________________ Last edited by Mirai Gen; 01-17-2008 at 02:44 AM.

01-16-2008, 07:30 PM	#47
*Fenris* Administrator Join Date: May 2005 Location: East Coast Posts: 6,806	Not so fast, Edgeworth. How could Moogle co-run a RP that was already started? Furthermore, how could POS have stolen an idea 6 months prior? I merely submitted the "Unsatisfactory Ending" to the Court Record, not the whole thread. The rest of the thread is provided for context. I hope your other witness has a more convincing case than this one did, for your sake. At any rate, I believe unless there is more to be said on this topic and it is about time the defense call their first witness to the stand. __________________ "FENRIS IS AN ASSHOLE" - shiney Last edited by Fenris; 01-16-2008 at 07:32 PM.

01-16-2008, 07:37 PM	#48
Mirai Gen We are Geth. Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 14,032	Your Honor, my client said "Before the last NPF Avatar game was to be held." He has also testified that he had 'yet to join the Roleplay section of the forums'. I believe he was not aware that there was a previous Nuklear Power Avatar thread before the one that was made November 25th. __________________ Last edited by Mirai Gen; 01-17-2008 at 02:43 AM.

01-16-2008, 07:43 PM	#49
*Fenris* Administrator Join Date: May 2005 Location: East Coast Posts: 6,806	While I accept this fact, that does not change my ruling-or my opinion. Your client also testified that the whole thing was his idea, which quite frankly is the part I'm more interested in. __________________ "FENRIS IS AN ASSHOLE" - shiney

01-16-2008, 07:46 PM	#50
Mirai Gen We are Geth. Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 14,032	Sigh. Very well, your honor. (I have to talk to my secretary about which cases she accepts for me...) __________________ Last edited by Mirai Gen; 01-17-2008 at 02:43 AM.