11-02-2009, 08:30 PM | #51 | ||
ahahah
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,456
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-02-2009, 08:30 PM | #52 | |
There is no Toph, only Melon Lord!
|
Quote:
__________________
I can tell you're lying. |
|
11-02-2009, 08:31 PM | #53 | |
History's Strongest Dilettante
|
Is not.
Quote:
__________________
"There are worlds out there where the sky is burning, and the sea is asleep, and the rivers dream. People made of smoke and cities made of song. Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there's injustice, somewhere else the tea's getting cold. Come on, Ace; we've got work to do!" Awesome art be here. |
|
11-02-2009, 08:32 PM | #54 |
Sent to the cornfield
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,566
|
I'm not saying they deserve this, I'm saying I'm not surprised they suffered the fate they brough ton themselves. No one DESERVES to be brutalized or abused, but people set themselves up for it and then wonder why.
I do not abhor their actions because they were abused, but because they allowed themselves to be abused. Try reading more than what you want out of what I post. @Mesden: well to be fair, money for college offered by a government institution is a bit more substantial of a carrot on a stick than eternal salvation at the hands of space jesus. But yes, I slipped up much the same way these scientologists did, however I maintained my individuality and free will at the cost of my own comfort and success within the institution, whereas they bought it all hook line and sinker and then wondered why their dreams were smashed. Last edited by Funka Genocide; 11-02-2009 at 08:35 PM. |
11-02-2009, 08:34 PM | #55 |
There is no Toph, only Melon Lord!
|
Oh, okay, you just consider them cowards, pussies, and pity their pathetic existences? I'm not sure what definition of abhor you use. It's hypocritical to the nth degree.
I think it's more importantly a supportive group of peers who've been through and understand your hardships. You can say money for college is still better but that's still subjective.
__________________
I can tell you're lying. Last edited by Mesden; 11-02-2009 at 08:36 PM. |
11-02-2009, 08:37 PM | #56 |
Sent to the cornfield
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,566
|
well yeah, but I mean I feel that way about all religions so uh...
what are we talking about again? oh right, the military isn't a religion, it's just an institution akin to indentured servituted. There's very little delusion involved, you get bullets and put them into foreigners. and honestly who would have issue witha support network of peers working together for common goals? Like the boyscouts or something? That's cool, I mean so are "friends" and "family" and "loved ones" you're stretching everything I've said and trying to demonize it, when you should just take it as face value. Having to rely on something real isn't weakness, it's human. Tricking yourself into believing your privvy to the secrets of existence because some old dude said so is weakness of the highest degree. Last edited by Funka Genocide; 11-02-2009 at 08:39 PM. |
11-02-2009, 08:37 PM | #57 | |
SOM3WH3R3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
|
Quote:
All of this is subjective. How they felt. Why they reacted. It's all subjective. Not to mention, that by adhering to the belief that you're superior, you're sacrificing individuality for the feeling of superiority. Not exactly the same, but not so very different. |
|
11-02-2009, 08:39 PM | #58 | ||
ahahah
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,456
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by MasterOfMagic; 11-02-2009 at 08:50 PM. |
||
11-02-2009, 08:47 PM | #59 |
What's going on?
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 1,237
|
I think the two prevailing arguments of thought are superiority of those who're suffering in the cult and how long it takes to get indoctrinated meaning something for justifying their nature.
"I'm not such a weak-minded individual to get suckered into a cult and let that happen to me," at least sounds to me like a I'm-superior comment, whether it is or not, and I think that's where some of the arguing is coming from. Some people condemn feelings of superiority in any sense (because it's not modern, it's not fair, or whatever) and others don't think much about it ("Well, I know I wouldn't get into trouble like that. That's just stupid.") Whether or not these two sides of the argument feel that's what they're saying, it looks like that's how both sides are being presented. If any of this makes sense. >> And then there's this argument that "it doesn't matter how long you've been in the church, you shouldn't allow it to get that far," and "It's a gradual process that everyone can be subjective to." Defining positions on these issues might make discussion less flamey (no offense to anyone) and more... I guess progressive is the word. |
11-02-2009, 08:48 PM | #60 | |
There is no Toph, only Melon Lord!
|
Quote:
Obviously sarcasm, but there's no definitive degree to which something is weakness. You oversimplify the situation of thousands of people and automatically assert that your self cited situation is a much less 'pathetic' (I hate the use of this word, personally) one for no reason other than you say and think so. Anecdotal, subjective, reasonless, and hypocritically unfair to those that you generalize and spite.
__________________
I can tell you're lying. |
|
|
|