01-28-2008, 04:46 AM | #1 |
Sent to the cornfield
|
Star Wars first time through
So I'm going to introduce my young cousins to Star Wars. I'm going to show them all six (yes the prequels are terrible but good fun for the younger ones) the only question is what order I should show them in.
There's the chronological order, 1-6 or I could show the original trilogy first. I'm leaning towards the latter because it preserves the whole Vader=Luke's father surprise and Vader is such a great villain that he doesn't deserve to be wussed down by Annakin. Of course I'm biased by the order in which I saw them and my dislike for the sequels. Any other opinions on the matter? What is the best way to show the movies for a first time viewer? |
01-28-2008, 06:10 AM | #2 | |
I Wish To Become The Gentleman
|
I see no problem with running 4-6 then 1-3, since it wont hurt to have a story happen, then a story to explain the background. Plot-chronological order is by no means necessary. Mind you, running 1-6 means that (roughly) the movies will just get better as they go on, which isn't an awful thing.
Alternatively, use science and show one 1-6 and one 4-6-1-3 and if possible grab another 98 or so kids for a better sample, then find some kind of way to measure the mean movie enjoyment like a questionairre with ratings going 1-10 or 'strongly disliked' to 'strongly liked' on various aspects of the movie. You might need a control group who just see the movies in a randomly determined order.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
01-28-2008, 08:00 AM | #3 |
The Power is Yet Unknown
|
go 4-6 so that the experience of the originals isn't tarnished by having 1-3. That way there won't be the badly tacked on retconning (see R2 and C3PO) existant on the viewings.
|
01-28-2008, 08:18 AM | #4 |
DA-DA-DA-DAA DAA DAA DA DA-DAAAAAA!
|
When my brother first introduced my nephew to Star Wars he did it 4-6 and then 1-3, and my nephew absolutely loves star wars now, so I don't see any harm in doing it that way. Plus, I kind of think that's the order their meant to be seen in, personally.
Plus, nobody would really care about young Anakin unless they already knew Anakin was going to turn into Darth Vader so that helps with that.
__________________
|
01-28-2008, 08:42 AM | #5 | |
An Animal I Have Become
|
It also depends on how old these cousins are, and whether they are more into 'ZOMG SPECIAL FX!!!" or they actually like good movies with with good stories...
If its the former, they'll probably enjoy 1-3 more. However, everybody knows 4-6 are the far better stories...
__________________
:fighter: "Buds 4-eva!!!" :bmage: "No hugs for you." Quote:
|
|
01-28-2008, 08:47 AM | #6 |
I will crush your economy.
|
The entire draw of the prequel movies was supposed to be watching Anakin turn into Vader. You'd be better off showing them 4-6 first.
__________________
Give me your wallet before I destroy you, mortal. |
01-28-2008, 02:18 PM | #7 | |
So we are clear
|
Too many of the plot twists were ruined by 1-3, not just the Anakin Vader thing, but what about scenes like finding out this short old swamp dwelling hermit is one of the greatest jedi of all time or that Luke and Leia are twins. I suppose 4-6 also ruined some things like who would become the emperor, but it was rather minor plus if they are young they might not pick up on it.
Quote:
__________________
"don't hate me for being a heterosexual white guy disparaging slacktivism, hate me for all those murders I've done." |
|
01-28-2008, 02:32 PM | #8 |
lol i dont even know
|
Original trilogy à œuf. Though I actually prefer the new trilogy to the old (I'M A HATER AND I DESERVE TO DIE), Vader's tragedy has more impact if you watch what he became first and then how did it happen.
Last edited by Regulus Tera; 01-28-2008 at 02:34 PM. |
01-28-2008, 03:40 PM | #9 |
Sent to the cornfield
|
Thanks for the help.
I'lll go with 4-6 first. |
01-28-2008, 04:13 PM | #10 | |
Old Gregg
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|