baby allowed to die because parents are poor.

spazzhands · 05-03-2005, 03:16 PM

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/news/pri...babyfight.html

A 5 month old baby has been diagnosed with lukemia. But because the parents are not affluent enough the hospital is going to pull the plug.
Terri Schiivo got huge media attention for being beyond recovery and completly brain-dead. But this baby, a baby that can have its condition treated, and has a whole life ahead of it, gets nothing! No media attention, no protests, no Government legislation!
Is this the actions of a "pro life" government? Or has the Bush administration got all the publicity that they needed from the schiivo case!

What are your opinions...

DarthZeth · 05-03-2005, 03:24 PM

Is there someone else out there willing to take care of the baby?

Skyshot · 05-03-2005, 03:54 PM

From what I hear, if a couple who could have children wanted to adopt, they would not be able to, because of the sheer demand from less...able couples. So, I suppose yes, DarthZeth.

Also, babies don't get the attention you'd expect because this happens so often. Believe me we (the pro-lifers) are doing what we can about it.

Napoleon98 · 05-03-2005, 03:58 PM

Sadly this is how a lot of stuff works in this country... One person, for no explainable reason, gets tons of media attention and (if its needed) help, despite the fact that they are actually one in a pool of thousands, possibly millions ofp eople who do the exact same thing/ have the same condition.

And don't completely dismiss them, I'm fairly sure these are the same people whom AOL and someo ther internet based comapny are helping. Apparently they're sending out some email, and they are giving 32 cents (ooohh big spenders) for every 3 people who forward it to 3 more people...I'm however a heartless bastard and promptly deleted it... So i can't see the companies or if its even the same people... but Howard jsut seems familiar.. So they are getting some media help, just not as much as Shiavo.

Mashirosen · 05-03-2005, 04:19 PM

Quote:

I'm fairly sure these are the same people whom AOL and someo ther internet based comapny are helping. Apparently they're sending out some email, and they are giving 32 cents (ooohh big spenders) for every 3 people who forward it to 3 more people...

Wrong kid, but either way, no, they're not.

Krylo · 05-03-2005, 04:32 PM

Where in that article does it say the baby is being taken off because of money issues? It says the child is being allowed to die because she doesn't have a chance in hell of surviving and the hospital/doctors feel that leaving her on life support is doing nothing but prolonging the pain and suffering with no chance of recovery.

The title should be: "Baby Allowed to Die Because Doctors Feel Prolonging Child's Pain With No Hope of Recovery is Fucking Mean."

Napoleon98 · 05-03-2005, 04:56 PM

Mashi- my bad... :/

Krylo- touch�

spazzhands · 05-04-2005, 11:13 AM

krylo - bugger... sorry.

Yeah, that is mean.

But even so. Keeping Schiivo alive was worth about as much (if not less) as this, at least this child may grow up and be intelligent. why was all the attention on Schiivo? Was it because there was no chance of failure? or are there any other reasons?

Bob The Mercenary · 05-04-2005, 11:28 AM

I think part of the reason the Shiavo case was given so much publicity was because of the suspicions surrounding the husband. They were making him out to be a murderer who poisoned his wife to claim an inheritance, all of which was proven false. But, the sheer amount controversy made it a juicy news story.

My dad's a pharmacist and puts up with experiences almost like these daily. He refuses to dispense drugs if you can't pay, no matter how bad the patient might be. But, that's how you run a business. He also does it partly because he can never tell who's an illegal alien with no real coverage or SS#. He's not heartless, it's just the way things are.

h4x.m4g3 · 05-05-2005, 12:33 AM

I'm not sure exactly how the quote goes but its something to the effect of 'When one person dies, its a tragedy, when a 100 die its a stitistic.' Now-a-days something has to wipe out either millions of people (aids, tsunami, HIV and other STDs) or one person to recieve mass media attention and recognition. Shiavo got attention because it was husband vs. everyone else and their was controversy there, people love controversy. Sadly in this world two loving parents doesn't sell, would John Q. had been a good movie, if he didn't take over the hospital at gunpoint?

Not sure, but it wouldn't have sold.

05-03-2005, 03:16 PM	#1
spazzhands spazzhands Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: staines, england Posts: 195	baby allowed to die because parents are poor. http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/news/pri...babyfight.html A 5 month old baby has been diagnosed with lukemia. But because the parents are not affluent enough the hospital is going to pull the plug. Terri Schiivo got huge media attention for being beyond recovery and completly brain-dead. But this baby, a baby that can have its condition treated, and has a whole life ahead of it, gets nothing! No media attention, no protests, no Government legislation! Is this the actions of a "pro life" government? Or has the Bush administration got all the publicity that they needed from the schiivo case! What are your opinions...

05-03-2005, 03:58 PM	#4
Napoleon98 He Who Is Called I Were Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Texas Posts: 252	Sadly this is how a lot of stuff works in this country... One person, for no explainable reason, gets tons of media attention and (if its needed) help, despite the fact that they are actually one in a pool of thousands, possibly millions ofp eople who do the exact same thing/ have the same condition. And don't completely dismiss them, I'm fairly sure these are the same people whom AOL and someo ther internet based comapny are helping. Apparently they're sending out some email, and they are giving 32 cents (ooohh big spenders) for every 3 people who forward it to 3 more people...I'm however a heartless bastard and promptly deleted it... So i can't see the companies or if its even the same people... but Howard jsut seems familiar.. So they are getting some media help, just not as much as Shiavo. __________________ :bmage: That Was Amazing. :thief: Oh, We've Done Better... Plus, Red Mage? You CanNOT Tell Him This, But He's Not Actually A Cross Dresser And He Has No Daddy Issues, I've Just Been Messing With His Head. :bmage: Wow

05-03-2005, 04:32 PM	#6
Krylo The Straightest Shota Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: It's a secret to everybody. Posts: 17,789	Where in that article does it say the baby is being taken off because of money issues? It says the child is being allowed to die because she doesn't have a chance in hell of surviving and the hospital/doctors feel that leaving her on life support is doing nothing but prolonging the pain and suffering with no chance of recovery. The title should be: "Baby Allowed to Die Because Doctors Feel Prolonging Child's Pain With No Hope of Recovery is Fucking Mean." __________________ I am very tired.

05-03-2005, 04:56 PM	#7
Napoleon98 He Who Is Called I Were Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Texas Posts: 252	Mashi- my bad... :/ Krylo- touch� __________________ :bmage: That Was Amazing. :thief: Oh, We've Done Better... Plus, Red Mage? You CanNOT Tell Him This, But He's Not Actually A Cross Dresser And He Has No Daddy Issues, I've Just Been Messing With His Head. :bmage: Wow

05-04-2005, 11:28 AM	#9
Bob The Mercenary Bob Dole Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Bob Dole Posts: 5,606	I think part of the reason the Shiavo case was given so much publicity was because of the suspicions surrounding the husband. They were making him out to be a murderer who poisoned his wife to claim an inheritance, all of which was proven false. But, the sheer amount controversy made it a juicy news story. My dad's a pharmacist and puts up with experiences almost like these daily. He refuses to dispense drugs if you can't pay, no matter how bad the patient might be. But, that's how you run a business. He also does it partly because he can never tell who's an illegal alien with no real coverage or SS#. He's not heartless, it's just the way things are. __________________ Bob Dole

05-04-2005, 11:13 AM	#8
spazzhands spazzhands Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: staines, england Posts: 195	krylo - bugger... sorry. Yeah, that is mean. But even so. Keeping Schiivo alive was worth about as much (if not less) as this, at least this child may grow up and be intelligent. why was all the attention on Schiivo? Was it because there was no chance of failure? or are there any other reasons?

05-05-2005, 12:33 AM	#10
h4x.m4g3 Lakitu Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,152	I'm not sure exactly how the quote goes but its something to the effect of 'When one person dies, its a tragedy, when a 100 die its a stitistic.' Now-a-days something has to wipe out either millions of people (aids, tsunami, HIV and other STDs) or one person to recieve mass media attention and recognition. Shiavo got attention because it was husband vs. everyone else and their was controversy there, people love controversy. Sadly in this world two loving parents doesn't sell, would John Q. had been a good movie, if he didn't take over the hospital at gunpoint? Not sure, but it wouldn't have sold.